The following is the copy I saw from the title: 35. I think that "outstanding people and people make history together". This view is as follows: a. Recognize the role of outstanding figures in social development and the correct view that people create history. B deny the wrong view that the contribution of outstanding figures to social development is subordinate to the role of the people. C. admit the correct view of historical synergy theory, that is, all individuals play a certain role. D. the proposition of denying wrong views analyzes the prominent position and contribution of outstanding figures in historical development. Regarding the historical role of outstanding figures, we should see that the important role of outstanding figures in historical development is secondary, subordinate to and subordinate to the people. The strength of the excellent comes from the people. Without the support of the people, no outstanding person can succeed. The direction and degree of the historical role of outstanding figures, as well as all their merits and demerits, depend on whether they conform to the historical laws and the interests and requirements of the people. History is created by people, and people are the main body of history. The mode of production is the decisive force for the existence and development of society, so the people, as the main body of the mode of production, are the creators of history. Outstanding figures cannot replace the people and become the creators of history. Outstanding people are representatives of the people. Fundamentally speaking, the role of outstanding people embodies the role of the people. Historical materialism advocates that people create history, and opposes the views of "heroes create history" and "heroes and people jointly create history". This "co-creation theory" seems comprehensive, but it has not got rid of the essence of idealistic historical view. Therefore, the correct answer to this question is option B.