Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Today in History - How to Criticize Historical Nihilism
How to Criticize Historical Nihilism
How to criticize historical nihilism is as follows:

1. Historical nihilism is a view that history has no objectivity and regularity, that is, there are no objective facts and real events in history.

2. Historical nihilists often refuse to accept the objectivity and authenticity of historical events, thinking that historical events are only personal subjective imagination and fiction, or that history is determined by some mysterious force.

3. Historical nihilism not only denies the objectivity of historical events, but also denies the value and significance of historical experience. It believes that history is only the accumulation of accidental events, and there is no inevitability and regularity.

4. Historical nihilism tends to attribute historical events to some mysterious force or unknowable factor, ignoring the social, political and economic factors behind historical events, thus denying the authenticity and objectivity of history.

5. Historical nihilism tends to attribute historical events to some unknowable factors, ignoring the social, political and economic factors behind historical events, thus denying the value and significance of historical experience.

Introduction to nihilism:

It refers to the philosophical significance that the existence of the world, especially human beings, has no meaning, no purpose, no understandable truth and no most essential value. It is not so much an openly expressed position as a tit-for-tat view.

Many commentators think that Dada, deconstruction and punk are nihilism, and nihilism is also defined as the characteristics of some times. For example, Baudrillard called postmodernism an era of nihilism. Nihilists are called nihilists.

Nihilism is sometimes regarded as a belief that truth does not exist. This belief is difficult to prove in the most extreme form. Because some people think that it contains a self-contradictory lie: if the truth does not exist and it is true, the "truth does not exist" itself is not true, thus proving their mistakes. A more complicated explanation is that truth may exist, but it can't be touched in reality.