Built a fake museum at a cost of 6.7 million? Chongqing University: Check it carefully.
10 10 14, an article entitled "Chongqing university spent 6.7 million to build a fake museum? Jiang Shang, the author, questioned the authenticity of the exhibit in the Chongqing University Museum-the author described the blue color of this three-color maid as "bluer than a ballpoint pen" ▼ This exhibit was rated as "advancing the electroplating process and the history of artificial gem for more than two thousand years" ▼ Seeing this unconventional car, the author smiled and said that "the manufacturer has made a reasonable transformation of the carriage structure" ▼ 0 1 It is reported that. Among the more than 400 exhibits on display, more than 300 bronzes, pottery and jade articles were donated by Wu Yingqi, a famous collector and professor of Chongqing University. Under that article, some readers, on behalf of Chongqing University and Professor Wu, "cried injustice" and thought that the author did not have the qualification for appraisal, which was irresponsible "nonsense"; Some readers also feel regret and anger, saying that the eyes of the masses are discerning, and this move by Chongqing University is really misleading; There are also audiences who have also been to the exhibition to join the ridicule army. After the news spread, the reading volume of the topic # Chongqing University Museum Accused of Some Collections as Fakes # has exceeded 1 1 by the date of publication, and more than 2,000 people participated in the discussion. According to the image of a frequent visitor to a museum, some netizens have carefully analyzed the problem and given some suggestions for solving it-@ 么么么么: Imitation is not a problem, just indicate it, but to engage in a pile of rubbish without common sense is to insult tourists and their careers. : www.jingjingjing.com The things on display in the history museum must be of historical value. Doesn't mean that museums can't use fakes. It is understandable that some museums will display replicas for reasons such as protecting authenticity. The effect of visiting this replica is the same as that of visiting the original, and you can clearly understand the characteristics of handicrafts in various dynasties. The key now is whether you have anything on display in those dynasties. This doesn't even have the most basic value @ chengying 1860: it was a good thing that universities built museums and alumni donated collections. Now it's so ugly. Apart from bureaucratic factors, the fundamental reason is our lack of respect for history and culture. Second, since it has been identified, there should be file verification. If it is irresponsible to issue an appraisal opinion, it should be exposed and the cultural relics department should deal with these experts. Third, if the expert appraisal is inconsistent with the exhibition, please ask the public security to investigate whether the cultural relics and exhibits have been replaced. If there is fraud, it should be investigated according to law. Some netizens also took the opportunity to "skinned" it-@ 丫丫丫丫丫丫丫: Please ask Teacher Wang Gang to help look after the treasure. If it's a fake, hit it with a hammer. I saw this painting in that museum. I think if Qin Shihuang were still alive, he might say: You upgraded my car @SankRooDonoo: Museum: We didn't expect experts to visit @ Fat man who likes astronomy: It's too fake for Panjiayuan to do it. Some netizens said that they were distressed by the students who carefully watched the exhibition-@ igorupsala: This school is also fall in price, and it is not afraid to teach bad children. It hurts a little to see those little girls who are watching the exhibition carefully in the online news. Even the CCTV anchor commented that we want to see authentic cultural relics. It can't be fake, and it can't be fake. The museum has been closed since it went online. The school said that it would immediately set up a special working group to check the situation with a serious and responsible attitude, and the results would be announced to the public in time. For the interview of the thesis, the school interviewed the staff and authoritative experts in the industry. They all think that as far as the published exhibits are concerned, these cultural relics are really outrageous and absurd, and even the level of the "national treasure gang" is not comparable. According to the personal data of Professor Wu Yingqi, the donor in this event, he has visited major museums in China and published books on how to distinguish ancient paintings from ancient porcelain. According to Hualong. When Chongqing University was planning to build a museum, Professor Wu told reporters that all the cultural relics he donated had been appraised by relevant experts. In addition, before the opening of the museum, the relevant person in charge of the school said in an interview with Chongqing Daily that one of the necessary conditions for building a double-class university is that the school should have a museum. In the future, the school will also build a new museum site of more than 20,000 square meters, and put some exhibits reflecting the school's teaching and scientific research achievements. In this regard, some netizens said: building a museum in colleges and universities is certainly conducive to humanistic education and general education for students, but if the quality of the collection is ignored just for rating, it will violate the original intention of building a museum and become qualitative. Now the news broke out, whether the relevant experts are unreliable or other reasons still need to wait for the verification results of the school before drawing a conclusion. However, this kind of museum farce is not a case, nor is it the first time. In 2009, the "National Treasure Gang" staged an embarrassing farce in the Great Hall of the People. Dozens of China folk collectors donated the so-called "66 cultural relics with a total value of hundreds of millions of RMB" to the Wenchuan County People's Government, many of which were considered as heinous fakes; 20 14 Jibaozhai Museum in Jizhou, Hebei Province claims to have collected more than 40,000 heavyweight cultural relics, but its exhibits have been called "destroying three views" by netizens in terms of artistic aesthetics and historical research, and Ma Boyong also said that it is very "shocking"; In 20 15, Zhejiang Normal University received 17 1 piece of porcelain donated by Li Shudi, a retired teacher of our school, and established a ceramic art museum for this purpose, but most of them were considered as fakes, and some collectors commented that it was "outrageous and outrageous"; 20 16 Beijing Normal University accepted 6000 pieces of ceramics donated by alumnus Qiu Jiduan. On this basis, Beijing Normal University established China Institute of Ancient Ceramics and Ancient Civilization in China and Qiu Jiduan China Ancient ceramics museum, and Qiu Jiduan was also appointed as the first curator. Some insiders questioned that the6,000 pieces were "fakes". Cultural institutions such as museums and art galleries, as recipients, should do a good job in screening and identifying gifts when receiving donations from the people to ensure that their quality and source are not only responsible for themselves, but also for the audience and society. Facing the question of public opinion, the positive response of Chongqing University at least did not disappoint the enthusiastic people who love and care about cultural undertakings. Although the donation of colleges and universities to build museums has repeatedly caused controversy, and experts have repeatedly suggested strict examination and approval, if the relevant cultural institutions cannot treat them with rigorous attitude and awe, and the legal system is not perfect enough, then this scandal is likely to reappear. I hope other colleges and universities interested in building museums can take this as a warning and keep their eyes open when receiving gifts and collecting cultural relics. May the future literary and historical circles get better and better. Note: Some pictures and texts come from the following articles and news reports: Chongqing Daily, Chongqing University Museum opened, and more than 400 exhibits were exhibited. In the article, Chongqing University built a fake museum? Cultural relics expert: If the fake is ridiculous, then identify it first. Jiang, the official account of WeChat WeChat, said that Chongqing University spent 6.7 million yuan to build a fake museum? Unless otherwise specified, the pictures are all from the Internet.