You can take a look at the trial measures for teacher recruitment interviews:

First, the lecturer should be modest. There are many awesome people who come to our school to give lectures (such as masters, vice principals and, I heard, principals). Some people may have been used to being arrogant in their own territory before, so they can't hide arrogance in their bones. Most of these awesome people will degenerate. I think in life, people who are too awesome will not be liked by everyone. Being awesome in front of strangers can only make people feel disgusted or bored. Some people with some skills are unhappy at home, often because of arrogance. Go outside. I can't eat if I don't change my old temper.

The vice principal in charge of teaching asked him how long it would take to prepare lessons. He read the text and said that one hour was enough. Well, it will be really excellent, of course, there is nothing to say. But the fact is basically impossible, especially for people who teach Chinese. Our headmaster teaches Chinese and is not satisfied with all our Chinese teachers. Under the leadership of such a demanding principal, the Chinese teacher is not idle. It is extremely difficult for these Chinese teachers to find fault with you. No one is perfect, and the class is not finished. You want to come up with a perfect class in an hour. Are you a fairy?

There are also some performances: no self-introduction before class, which is the basic requirement of the school, and the vice principal will explain it before class. You'd better turn off your cell phone in class and never answer the phone. If you forget to turn off your phone, you'd better turn it off in time when others are on the phone, so as not to let others call again to disturb the class. This is all based on consciousness. Busy leaders are easy to get carried away. Strolling in other people's territory without saying hello to anyone. Don't pay attention to appearance and dress, thinking that talented people don't cut their hair or trim their edges.

Second, the classroom should be focused, which is the basic requirement. But in the real class, it is also a common problem to be reluctant to lose that share. Try to talk for no more than 30 minutes. If you want to talk about everything, you can only scratch the surface. Teachers who teach in technical secondary schools have more serious problems in this respect. There is a teacher who has a hard time in class. It is futile to write on the blackboard only from the author's introduction and article level. What era is it now? It is still the era of manual copying. It's still a classroom in the 1980s. All irrigation, all plagiarism. Even if you exert yourself, you can neither highlight the key points nor show your own specialties, killing two birds with one stone.

Third, tell me your deep understanding of the article. It should be noted that to be good at inspiring and inducing students, we must pay attention to the audience, thinking that the following are college students who come to listen to the lecture. Last year, a university teacher tried to talk about "Venus of Milos" and talked about aesthetics with 40 points. After the lecture, the headmaster said there was no need to evaluate the class. Master or doctor should pay special attention to this tendency when trying to give lectures. Because they are too knowledgeable, they tend to ignore the reality of middle school students, do not engage in inspiration and induction, and talk in a fog. Such people are not suitable for middle school teaching, and schools certainly don't want them. To correct this problem, you must have some teaching experience in middle school. Therefore, a master who has never stood on the podium of a middle school may not succeed if he wants to enter a good middle school, unless others use it otherwise.

Fourth, don't talk too much about article study. Some teachers have done some research on article learning. Therefore, when analyzing the text, they pay great attention to the anatomy of the article form, such as rhetoric, writing techniques, article characteristics, cohesion, description classification, classification and application of expression techniques, and article appreciation methods. These things are not forbidden, but they should not be the focus of the class. The teacher who said that preparing lessons only took one hour made this mistake. He has a good foundation and is good at writing articles. Results The whole class dissected the structure and layout of words and sentences according to his knowledge of article study. Break it into pieces. That sounds reasonable. At the end of the class, everyone thought that his understanding and analysis of the ideological content of the article was not in place, and he only dissected it from the technical level.

Five, to sum up (for others' reference, but also for your own reference when preparing for the open class), try to do the following aspects in the lecture:

1. Keep your head down and be modest. No matter you are a leader or an ordinary teacher, you should pay attention to your words and deeds. A cow will capsize.

2, the lecture should be passionate, if the intonation is insufficient, at least the voice should be loud. Mandarin is a little more standard.

3. The speed of speaking and writing should not be too slow. Too slow, people will doubt your efficiency. Not too bad.

4, to use computers, to keep up with the pace of the times, the network era, teachers who do not use computers in class will be eliminated.