Speaking of Emperor Taizong, everyone is familiar with it. After he succeeded to the throne, he actively listened to the opinions of the wise ministers, studied hard to govern the world, practiced economy, and made the people recuperate. It created the rule of Zhenguan and laid the foundation for the prosperity of the Tang Dynasty. But this eternal monarch has his disgraceful side of tampering with history. Today, the evil Bian Xiao will tell you the dark side of Emperor Taizong.
In Zi Tong Zhi Jian, Sima Guang clearly pointed out that the part about the change of Xuanwu Gate in Tang Taizong's memoir was not credible. As we all know, historians will record what the emperor said and did in court. In the record, the emperor himself could not understand it, let alone change it. Li Shimin not only saw it. You said you read it. If you think he is not satisfied after reading it, it is deleted! ! ! Change it! Change it! ! ! So some of the history of the early Tang Dynasty was tampered with by Li Shimin.
Through the change of Xuanwu Gate, Li Shimin killed Prince Li Chengjian and his younger brother Li Yuanji and forced his father to give him the throne. In order to show that he killed his brother pre-emptively, in self-defense, and that the succession to the throne was justified, he greatly vilified his father and brother. Exaggerated his contribution to the establishment of the Li and Tang Dynasties, portrayed his younger brother as a lewd and sinister villain, and portrayed his father as a fatuous and unscrupulous generation. The worst records in history books are about Li and Li Yuanji's adultery with his father's concubine and with the harem. However, after Li Shimin secretly played his father, his father did not overreact. It is true that Li Li has made more contributions, but Li is by no means a mediocre person. If Li Zhen's is as miserable as described in the history books, will such a loser be a prince?
Although Li Shimin tampered with history and sat on the throne in a disgraceful way, after he succeeded to the throne, he hired talents, modestly advised farmers and mulberry workers to live and work in peace and stability. I really appreciate it． No one is perfect, although, in the eyes of his family, he is not a good brother and son. However, in the eyes of the people, he is definitely a good emperor.
Some evidence of tampering with history
The volume of Zi and Jian 197 records an important event of Bingzi year after year. At the beginning, it was said that Fang, who supervised the revision of National History, said: What historians recorded in their previous lives is not convincing. Why? Yes, history is beautiful, it does not hide evil. If people are opinionated, they will be angry, so they dare not offer.
Above: I am a heart, different from previous lives. The emperor wants to look at the history of the country and know that the evil of the day before yesterday is a hindsight, so the public can write and smell it once.
At the suggestion of doctor Zhu Zi, he said: Your majesty's virtue lies in the bow, which is understandable. As historians say, righteousness returns to the best. It is useless for your majesty to look at his daily life alone. If this method is passed on to his descendants, he is afraid that if he is mysterious or unwise and does not excuse his mistakes, historians will be punished. In this way, I hope it will go smoothly and stay away from harm. What do you believe? So the last generation didn't look at it, and it was built for this reason.
Not from above. In the event, Xu was deleted as a great-grandfather, recorded today; After a long time, after writing, it is on it. I have read the story of June 4th in a book, which is very vague. Let's talk about it: Duke Zhou was in charge of customs, Cai Yi 'an was in charge of Zhou, and entrusted friends to save Lu. What I do is just like my ears. Why should historians be so shy? That is, I ordered to cut off the floating word and write it straight.
The Zhenguan small theater began.
In 643, Kao Fang: A Ling, a former historian, recorded those things. Why didn't the emperor understand them at that time?
Subtext:
Square text contains latitude and longitude. How can you not know the meaning of Taizong? You can kill your brother and force your father to abdicate, which is not much different from that of Emperor Yang Di, so he replied: Because it is impossible for historians to make up all the good things and hide all the ugly things. The sons of heaven will be angry when they see it. They dare not go to school.
Subtext: Taizong immediately changed to a retired veteran cadre at or above the bureau level: I am different from those before, hehehe! I want to know what mistakes I made, so as to take a warning. You can show it to me after you write it.
Subtext:
At this time, the admonition officer Zhu Zishe said: Your Majesty, you are a great mentor, a great leader, a great helmsman, and what historians say will not be bad. You actually read it after reading it, but this thing is hard to say. I'm just worried about your bad things. No. When your excellent genes arrive, a Xiong Haizi will come out from generation to generation. He will learn from you, but he doesn't have your virtue. It will be the historians who are unlucky then. The disaster was so profound that the former emperors didn't even look at it.
The emperor insisted, but Fang was helpless. Xu and others deleted the daily life record of Taizong and changed it to April in Guangxi, which was presented to the emperor. Seeing that he couldn't talk, the emperor was mysterious and gave instructions to the veteran cadres: "Oh, I did what I had to do. Just say it. There is no need to be shy. " "
In short, it is certain that Emperor Taizong has read his memoirs, and it is not the original. Fang and Xu had revised it before he read it. It is no longer credible. In addition, all the descriptions of Li in the Tang Dynasty are not as good at fighting as they are. It's basically a rich old man with a big fool. If it weren't for the great leader of feudalism and General Li Shimin, and the never-setting sun of the people of the Tang Dynasty, the world would not have defeated Smecta. There is a common logical anomaly in history books. They are brave and foolhardy, they are indecisive, they are greedy for money and lustful, but they are always invincible except the last one.