Some people say that history is reality. In other words, what happened in history is still happening now, but the form has changed, and many things in reality have historical shadows. There are many such examples. For example, our current reform has happened many times in history. Nowadays, the disputes and wars among countries in the world are similar to those in China's Warring States Period, the Three Kingdoms Period and the Imperial Age in Europe and West Asia. Tragedy and comedy of joys and sorrows in history are not repeated scenes. Therefore, if you want to learn history well, don't separate history from reality, understand history with reality, and take care of reality with history, then you will learn fun, and then you will have a deeper understanding of history and reality, as if opening a new world. What I want to say about history is that the key lies in peacetime, and it is useless to cram for the Buddha's feet temporarily. Especially for the students who take the small comprehensive test or the big comprehensive test, the usual foundation is the key to winning or losing. I have suffered such losses myself. Wei Xie, who teaches me history, is a very serious and good teacher. His class seems to have a kind of magic, which can attract you tightly. The long river of history seems to be close to us at once under his explanation. More importantly, he can always guide us to think about the relationship and essence behind them through complicated historical phenomena. This is the most important way to learn history. Under his guidance, I successfully studied history in my freshman year. Maybe I was carried away by the victory. Senior two began to be lazy and no longer paid attention to mastering the basic knowledge in time. I just memorized it temporarily before the exam. I didn't realize how stupid I was until I reviewed in the third semester of senior three. Because of my solid basic knowledge, I can recall all the contents effortlessly. And even if you read the text of Grade Two for several times, you may still forget it. Only then did I know why the teacher always asked us to "focus on the foundation and peace". The study of history in high school is completely different from that in junior high school, and rote learning can't solve the problem. What high school history needs more is understanding. It is best to review once a week and once a month. When reviewing, the key is to read books repeatedly and improve in repetition. Books are the most fundamental. It is unrealistic to talk without books. When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event, whether there is any internal connection between them, and what historical truth can be explained. Historical events can also be compared horizontally and vertically. For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean? It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence. Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions. I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical. If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately and solve any problems we encounter. This is a problem that should be paid attention to when reading. Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident. I believe you will soon find that the more you read, the more interesting you will be. Secondly, it is of course very important to do the questions. The process of doing the problem is actually a process of review and reflection. Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself. This is usually a test of your analysis of an event. This requires the use of the set of kung fu accumulated during reading, and there are also some skills. For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects of productivity determining production relations and economic base determining superstructure. As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct. In my opinion, the questions of "direct" and "indirect" are actually very simple. When you answer "direct", you can make your thinking simpler. You will be what you thought at first, and you don't have to turn any corners at all. Everything except "direct" can be safely classified as "indirect". As for the question and answer, you need your thinking and analytical skills. Don't expect the questions on the test paper to be what you have seen before, let alone bother to recite a certain question. As long as you master the method, the questions and answers are easy to solve. The first is analysis. Try to think about this problem from more angles by recalling the teacher's introduction when he talked about this part. Don't worry about thinking too much, as long as you think it makes sense, it may be right. What's more, the current exam has repeatedly stressed that "students should be encouraged to play freely, be brave in innovation and have their own opinions", so you should think as much as possible. The second is expression. It is best to elaborate one by one and write one or two lines at a time. The key is to write down the main points, because when marking papers, the main points are also distributed, and too much is written. It takes several times to finish a key point, which will not only take the lead, but also make the teacher deduct points because he can't find the key point and waste a lot of time, so that he can't finish the paper. Another skill in dividing articles is to decide how many articles to divide according to a given score. Generally, one point is two to three points. If a question is eight points, it is likely that it has four points. This method can effectively reduce the possibility of missing answers. Even if you really can't think of anything else to answer, try to fill in the calculated figures. At the same time, pay attention to the sequence number. If big dots and small dots are marked with different serial numbers, they will be clear and logical, and it is not easy to lose points. Finally, the handwriting must be neat. Think about it, a teacher has to correct so many papers in such a short time. If the handwriting is scrawled, which marking teacher will give you a high score in a good mood? Finally, it is also helpful to communicate with teachers and classmates more. No matter how careful a person is, there will be negligence. By exchanging notes with classmates and discussing exercises with teachers, there are often many unexpected gains. You can also read magazines like History Learning, learn things that are not in textbooks, and improve the depth and breadth of thinking, which is very helpful to solve problems. Try to spend one or two hours in history class every day in the next semester of senior three. Because history has a feature that is easily forgotten. What you remember today is likely to be forgotten the next day. Therefore, reviewing history should pay more attention to planning. In addition to keeping up with the teacher's review progress, we should also have our own plans, set a timetable for ourselves, review what content at what time, pay attention to science and rationality, and ensure that it can be completed on time. Can be done on two lines at the same time. One is the teacher's and the other is your own. For example, when the teacher is reviewing the world history, you can also look at the history of China while mastering the world history. Not only did I remember more contents, but it was also conducive to the comparison between China and foreign countries, which gave me a general grasp of the three-year history knowledge of senior high school, and the effect was several times better than that of reviewing world history alone. In addition, special review is also very important. It can help you master historical clues, study some historical laws and other things in depth, and increase the depth and breadth of your thinking. In fact, history is a very interesting subject, so don't worry about not learning well. As long as you are willing to work hard and master the methods, history will become very simple. How to learn history well Author: Unknown article Source: Click on this site: 38 1 Update time: July 2, 2005 Many students think that history is the most suitable course for rote learning. As long as you spend some time reciting before the exam, your grades will still be good, and even you will get good grades in the exam. If you really think so, you are all wet. It is not easy to learn history well, especially in the face of the high demand for ability in the comprehensive examination paper of liberal arts. So how can we learn history well? I will discuss it with you. I think the first thing is to be interested. Only when you are interested in history will you take the initiative to study history. Don't hold the psychology that I won't study until I take the history exam. Interest is a very subtle thing. With interest, you can quickly remember knowledge points, understand and comprehend the historical laws behind historical phenomena, and analyze historical problems with ease. On the other hand, it is tantamount to suffering in the blast furnace of Taishang Laojun, but it cannot be refined. Then how can students who are not interested in it be trained like this? First of all, you should try to put your mind right and don't always contradict. If so, God can't save you. Then, think about the historical dramas you have seen before. Students with good history can even ask a history teacher to talk about this historical drama from a historical perspective, and you will find many interesting things that you didn't know before. The most important thing is that you can find that history is not boring, but interesting. Finally, if you listen to more history classes, you will find that the history teacher in our school is not bad. Although I can't guarantee that you will fall in love with history, at least I believe that you are interested in history classes. Of course, if you have interest, you can only get twice the result with half the effort without good learning methods. Many students think that the key to learning history is rote learning, which is wrong. What high school history needs more is understanding. Understanding based on textbooks. So what is important is how to build a historical structure that is easy for you to understand. In fact, this is also very simple. When reading the contents of each section, we should think about what happened before and after a historical event, whether there is any internal connection between them, and what historical truth can be explained. Historical events can also be compared horizontally and vertically. For example, what are the similarities and differences between two coups or two policies? Why are there such similarities and differences? What does it mean? It is also very simple to analyze similarities and differences, which is nothing more than thinking from several fixed plates such as background, nature and influence. Some books say that history should be studied in three dimensions. I think the so-called "three-dimensional" is probably the connection between horizontal and vertical. If we often think like this, we can analyze the essence of different historical phenomena more accurately and solve any problems we encounter. This is a problem that should be paid attention to when reading. Books are more than just reading. It's no use remembering some times, places and events. The most important thing is to learn to think and study with historical thinking and explore what is behind the incident. I believe you will soon find that the more you read, the more interesting you will be. Because we have to face the exam after all, we will never shy away from the question of exam skills in the process of talking about learning history well. Nowadays, there are few historical questions that simply test knowledge itself. This is usually a test of your analysis of an event. This requires the use of the set of kung fu accumulated during reading, and there are also some skills. For example, when doing multiple-choice questions, we often encounter some problems such as "root" and "essence", which are usually analyzed from the aspects of productivity determining production relations and economic base determining superstructure. As long as there are options about these aspects, they are generally correct. As for the question and answer, you need your thinking and analytical skills. The first is analysis. Try to think about this problem from more angles by recalling the teacher's introduction when he talked about this part. Don't worry about thinking too much, as long as you think it makes sense, it may be right. What's more, the current exam has repeatedly stressed that "students should be encouraged to play freely, be brave in innovation and have their own opinions", so you should think as much as possible. The most taboo is to think that you can't write anything. Finally, when answering questions, the handwriting must be clear. Answer clearly and logically. Don't be wordy about every point, but be sure to give the main points in general. Every point should be marked with a serial number so that it can be clear. I can only think so much about this topic for the time being. I hope everyone will walk well on the road of history study. ,