?

introduce

Evolution, a false belief! Evolution, an ignorant self-confidence! Evolution, a misguided belief!

1859, Darwin proposed the theory of evolution. He believes that life was not created by God, but evolved from simple to complex in a long time. Strictly speaking, the theory of evolution is only a hypothesis, and then Darwin hoped to find conclusive evidence in the future, but so far he has not found any evidence that can stand the test, but the theory of evolution is very different from the facts, and the conclusion cannot be repeated. Later scholars evolved into a kind of? Inheritance of scientific beliefs. It is also because of faith that it was introduced into truth, academia and the public, and soon formed a popular view, a new hypothesis, parroting, which has always been regarded as truth. But rigorous scholars know that many people who accept it have not put a hypothetical truth on it, and the truth must be strictly reasoned and irrefutable evidence, which is the lack of evolution.

? The author has been interested in the study of evolution for many years, which is a strong feeling to safeguard his dignity. But in the face of more and more facts and rigorous thinking, I saw the mistakes of evolution. Here, I hope to make the evolution problem and some little-known facts public in simple language. It is necessary to change the situation that evolutionists have replaced the public and even knowledge in other fields for more than 0/00 years-in the face of facts and rigorous reasoning, the opportunity for rational thinking is left to everyone.

Naked mask

1880, many complicated stone tools were unearthed at the foot of Mount Taibo in California, USA. The identification confirmed that it was a relic of 550 thousand years ago, which completely broke the theory of evolution in the human evolution system. However, this amazing discovery was soon inexplicably "forgotten". Generally speaking, when attacked, it is always unwilling to doubt its beliefs, even if it should doubt or don't want to ignore the facts it faces.

1966, a batch of iron anchors unearthed in TAG Heuer, Mexico, were ordered to be identified by American geologist Dr. MacIntyre. She used two methods of the Iron Anchor era, and the result was the same: 250,000 years ago. This violates the theory of evolution and the result is unacceptable to the scientific community. It is willing to accept the pressure of a European scholar to become a person of the times. Professor MacIntyre has a certain reputation in the world, but he gradually lost the opportunity to work in related fields.

The late archaeologist Amanta suffered a similar fate. He found that in the volcanic lava city of Puri, Mexico, a broken iron anchor was identified among prehistoric animals with jaws, and a weapon dating back to 260,000 years was found. Some publications published this unusual article, but it quickly attracted criticism from authoritative sources. They didn't do any investigation, and Amata was killed in his career.

There are many such stories. If the total number of people is defending the past, experience can be used to deny the facts. There are not a small number of people who have authoritative opinions in the public mind. Scientific experts believe that if it becomes a preconceived thinking framework, it is difficult for the public to understand the actual situation and can only unconditionally accept authoritative views-science has become a belief here.

With the passage of time, the theory of time evolution has exposed more and more problems. Because some evolutionists began to be made public, evolutionism raised questions cautiously, which naturally attracted criticism without exception. However, facts are facts after all, and theoretical confusion has always attracted the pursuit of truth.

Second, the explosion of the three major evidences of evolution

There are three classical evidences of evolution: comparative anatomy, paleontology and embryonic development, but in recent years, they have disintegrated one by one.

Comparative anatomy, exposing evolutionary logic errors-circular argument.

? On the contrary, scientific theory proves that the logic of this theory cannot be established, but there is no deep callback for the logical errors of human evolution, and there is no evidence at all because of the deep callback. For example, comparative anatomy is used to prove the theory of evolution, saying that "if people are apes, they have many similar characteristics, and many people are similar to apes." To understand human logic is to know that this circular argument is meaningless. This specious "proof" runs through all the evidence, evolution. Others, people blindly accept.

? On the basis of logic, the unrepeatable embryonic development law can't stand scrutiny in theory, but it is actually an observation error.

In the19th century, German haeckel repeated this legal theory, that is, the evolution of species is carried out during the embryonic development and reproduction of higher organisms. In fact, the law itself is a hypothesis of repetition, which has become an important evidence of evolution: if evolution exists, embryonic development and repetition "are very similar to the repetition in the process of evolution, which is not only a meaningless tautology, but also covers the most crucial point: whoever does not understand what" repetition and evolution "are, insists that this is a causal relationship.

In fact, the hypothesis of "biological reappearance" is still underdeveloped, and the emergence of genetics and molecular biology, especially the in-depth study of this gene, has lost its theoretical basis. Since the last gene has mutated into a new gene, how can we reproduce the characteristics of the past? When repeating the law itself, paleontologist Gould also pointed out the fatal flaw of the theory, which is * * * knowledge.

Now, many scholars have proved that repetition is an observation error. German, erich Blechschmidt's book "the origin of human life" in his book, detailed data show that the fetus is a person's structure. For example, it used to be thought that the early fetus looked like a fish's "branchial cleft", but the actual fetus's face was wrinkled and its structure was complete, so it was hard to say it was a "branchial cleft". Where is the fetus? About 9 mm, if the body at the lower end of the protuberance is a tail, in fact, the tail without structural characteristics is a hollow neural tube. The rapid development and small resistance are temporary and will soon calm down. This is an important function, but there are no residual organs at all.

? Rare deformities: hairy children and children with long tails, evolution is the characteristic of human ancestors; According to this reasoning, there are many brainless children. Are human ancestors brainless? Congenital limb deformities and long fingers and toes are also common, so did the human body evolve from various deformities? I think that the discovery of jumping out of evolution is only an atavism with deformity or defect, which is not only a reflection of gene distortion, but also an unreasonable connection with human ancestors.

? Paleontology, at present, has not found conclusive evidence-if evolution exists, it must be a transitional type between species in the process of evolution, otherwise evolution is fallacy.

Logically speaking, transitional fossils will become one of the three major evidences of evolution. In fact, in this regard, whether there is conclusive evidence available, Darwin and others doubt that clear evidence will be found in the 20th century, and the evidence is "speculation"-this is very serious. What is this? Up to now, countless unearthed paleontological fossils are evidence that can withstand scrutiny and identification under any circumstances.

From apes to humans, finding a transitional species "apes" has long been included in the "top ten unsolved problems" of science. The human ancestors announced several times were quickly denied. For example, in 1892, the ape-man transitional fossil "Jiabo, a 40-foot separation composed of ape-man skull and human leg bones, was denied by academic circles". It was not until 1984 that Jiabo was discovered by the newly discovered ape fossil "Lucy", instead of. Later, after identification, Lucy was also denied by scholars. Scientists have determined that Lucy is an extinct ape and human. The appearance of "six archaeopteryx fossils" has caused a sensation in the world and is a model of transitional species between birds and reptiles. Afterwards, it was found that five people, one resolutely refused any appraisal. The original "discoverer" admitted that one of the reasons for the fraud was that he believed in evolution too much and created the most powerful evidence. Archaeopteryx and Lucy's textbooks have not been corrected, and the public will not know the truth.

If evolution exists, what are the transition types? Fossils should be easy to find, why not? We follow Darwin's explanation that the fossil record is incomplete. Deep thinking: the formation of fossils is universal and random, why did you miss the transitional type? The author of this book, The Trial of philip johnson, concludes: "Fossils show us some kind of organism that suddenly appeared without any trace of its evolution ... These creatures seem to be very basic? No matter how the climate and environment change, the world has not changed even after millions of years. Darwin's theory holds that these conditions should lead to great changes in this species. "

? According to the geological and historical facts, paleontologists Stephen Jay Gould Gould and eldridge put forward the "punctuated equilibrium" hypothesis to explain the possibility of transitional fossils, but did not explain why transitional types did not exist at all. The evolutionary mechanism of this hypothesis is absolutely impossible from the genetic point of view.

Third, modern evolution, fatal mistake.

If this theory is correct, we can confirm complementarity and proven truth in different aspects from different angles. The proof of relativity, that genes are DNA molecules, that's all. When it comes to evolution, it is the opposite: the fundamental opposition between various theories, the biggest difference is uniqueness.

? The example cited by Gould vividly reveals the reason: "In DGBrinton's 1890, the research points out that blacks are inferior because they retain the characteristics of teenagers, while the research of L. Bolk's 1926 claims that blacks are inferior because their development exceeds the characteristics of white youth." Why do contradictory arguments support the same view? Because they found the basis of a false belief, instead of drawing scientific conclusions based on facts. Exposure here is also an evolutionary problem.

Generally speaking, if a theory is fundamentally contradictory and contradicts some proven theorems, scientific rigor is untenable. After several fatal questions, it is enough to deny the theory of evolution:

Probability calculation shows that the possibility of biological evolution is absolutely impossible. It is inconceivable for Darwin to explain the evolution of evolutionary modernity theory from the genetic level. Genes cannot be fundamentally changed, and it is meaningless to change everything. In other words, it must evolve according to genetic evolution. Modern evolutionism explains the fundamental reason of evolution with the hypothesis of random mutation of genes. It is worth mentioning that in the general mathematical formulas and models of applied biology, evolutionists have never put forward a formula to calculate the possibility of gene mutation mechanism to realize evolution, because any reasonable formula will deny evolution.

Many scholars have proved that the wrong modernization theory has evolved, and Bessie's Darwin's Black Box evolved possibility from the denial of possibility in a complex life.

A loose formula puts forward the mutation rate here to calculate the probability of new species: p = (m c l b? S) and &

Generally speaking, it means that individuals of a species mutate (maybe only10&; &-3), compatibility of mutant genes with different levels of products of other genes (roughly estimated as10&; &-2), and in the competition of individual survival, the opportunity of reproduction (10&; &-1), mutation (in this case, it is estimated that 10 has good vertical evolution significance &; &-3), and the mutant genes in the population? Don't lose it, stabilize it, expand it, and once it is lost, it will be heavier (loose estimate10&; &-2), because the formation of a new species requires a series of new genes to appear, it is assumed to be 10 (the index N = 10, and there is absolutely no such small genetic difference in actual species), and then the probability of evolving a new species is: p = (-1-2&&; & amp& amp 10。 & amp-3× 10× 10× 10 & amp； & amp-3× 10 & amp； & amp-2)& amp； & amp 10 = 10。 & amp- 1 10。

According to the annual breeding 10 generation, it takes a lot of time to evolve the number of individuals in 1000 population, and it also takes10&; & kloc-0/06. From the current scientific point of view, the total number of all elementary particles in the universe is only10&; & amp70. The age of the universe is only 20 billion (2×10&&; 10 years), the evolution time of new species is one billion times the age of the universe, so evolution is impossible.

Numerous practices have proved that change and new species are two different things. Darwin promoted the evolution of biological species in a species. Dogs can develop many kinds, so monkeys have evolved into adults. This kind of hype itself is very doubtful. The actual result of this conjecture denies Darwin. Breeding experts know that the range of activities of a species is limited. The final breed is not sterile, but becomes the original father.

On the whole, the speed of mutation is getting slower and slower, fewer and fewer people mutate, and natural ability is surviving, so the speed of evolution should be slower and slower; Darwinism holds that in geological history, from a vertical perspective, new organisms appear faster and faster, showing an obvious trend of accelerated evolution.

The Evolution Timetable covers a large number of negative examples, and fossils show the history of frequent disasters. The timetable of biological evolution proves that the mistakes made by evolution in fossil records are very limited, and many birds cheat Archaeopteryx. With more and more fossils unearthed in the future, a large number of examples denied the theory of evolution, but they suppressed it because these findings were incomprehensible. All paleontological discoveries are arranged in chronological order, and the results are enough to deny evolution. Archaeologists Kramer and Thomson (RichardThompson of Michael A. Cremo) listed 500 conclusive examples of the opposite theory of evolution, which are the remains of human civilization tens of thousands, tens of millions, tens of thousands or even hundreds of millions of years ago.

The archaeologist Y. Druet discovered a rock layer with different types of metal pipes in a limestone layer in France, which is 65 million years old. Dinosaur footprint fossils found in the rock strata of human footprint fossils 12 along the lakeside of Dezhou. Fossils of human fingers and hammers were found in the same stratum, and the handle of the hammer has turned into coal, which shows its ancient times. The hammer contains 96.6% iron, 0.74% sulfur and 2.6% chlorine, which is an alloy that can't be made out with full marks at present. Can be traced back to 280 million years ago, hundreds of exquisite metal balls, 2 billion years ago, the large nuclear reactor, its structure is better than today's art, many scholars speculate that the reactor was maintained 20 thousand years ago, the ancient temple was obviously built by aliens on the earth, reflecting the knowledge beyond modern astronomy and metallurgical technology; The discovery of iron weapons 2.5 billion years ago shows that human civilization is not very developed. The famous American science magazine 98(282 1453 1459) published a series of archaeological discoveries:10.5 million years ago, 23,000 years ago, mammoth ivory carving hundreds of millions of years ago, and horses. We know that it only took about 5,000 years for our human civilization to develop from ignorance to today's glory. Do ancient historical sites wrongly represent civilizations in different periods? And the list goes on.

Facts tell people that human civilization follows such a law: "So birth-development-extinction". Within the framework of evolution, you will find that the fossils of evolution are actually open. Fossils can't be formed generally. All living things are rotting and weathering, and they must be buried deep underground. Under strong pressure, they will gradually become fossils. Only a catastrophe is imminent? In order to provide such conditions, these fossils have become the witness of disaster. The study of fossil formation only tells people that developed species suddenly appear in a large area in a short time? Development and prosperity, to great destruction, residual and emerging species, and so on.

There are many direct evidences of periodic disasters on the earth. The remains of thousands of frozen mammals were found under the pressure of Siberian permafrost. Some are intact, some are torn to pieces, and the trunks are twisted together. The food in their stomachs was tested and it was found that Ranunculus ternatus was not digested in time. The facts of life tell people that no matter how gentle the heart is, it is also a grassland, and in a very short time, a devastating disaster has occurred. Hapgood: In a very short time, the pressure brought by thousands of miles of plate movement reached Siberia today. Of course, it is also an important cause of other disasters. The map of the world drawn by feinawus(Oronteus fina EUS) discovered by Professor Hapgood in 1532 according to historical data shows that under the Antarctic ice sheet, it is stacked together in the modern Antarctic ice sheet, and it has a strikingly similar appearance. Constantinople (Constantinople) also found that in 15 13, pryor, (A. PiriReis),? The maps of Africa, South America and Antarctica along the coast of Gonzalez, combined with historical data, can judge longitude more than half more accurately than humans, as early as 250 years at sea. Obviously, this is on the ruins of a human civilization. In addition, Antarctica is not included in this period of civilization.

Fourth, what do humans have? forget the past

At this point, is it necessary to maintain the belief of evolution? In fact, scientists admit that evolution is a kind of belief, and they can't prove whether there is a new theory. We can only use it to oppose the ruins that it may confuse. Many such examples are counterproductive. Many scientists have struggled for decades to develop their theories. We studied more ethereal things, such as Newton and Einstein's theory of evolution, and finally woke up and found the answer in religion. New Zealand geneticist Michael Denton wrote in Crisis Theory: Evolution. This book says frankly: "Darwin's theory of evolution is the biggest lie of the 20th century".

? India produced a great spiritual master in the later period. In his introduction, St. Prabhupada wrote: "Bhagavad-gita", which originally meant "mortals have four defects: (1) are bound to make mistakes; (2) The illusion of frequent confusion? (3) there is a tendency to cheat; (4) the limitations of sensory incompleteness. These four defects that can't fully convey ubiquitous knowledge are the best portrayal of the evolution of theory and its followers.

The whole biological evolution theory is not only misleading, but also misleading in many fields of psychology, ethics and philosophy, misleading the development of human civilization. The potential harmful influence of human civilization is shocking: it is bound by the good and evil of religion and morality, the spirit of deception and corruption, and it adopts various means to tell people the survival law of the jungle and the survival of the fittest in competition; People believe that anti-traditional and anti-trend distortions may have more evolutionary and better results. People believe that people are descendants of animals and human nature comes from animals. Further development, western psychology: human desire is the most important nature, even the best natural evolution, which removes the restrictions from scientific material and moral corruption and is full of all aspects of social propaganda. Every such corrupt factor permeates the modern society of ordinary people, which contributes to the potential of people's moral decline. The indulgence of the curved evolutionary side develops around you. In the fierce competition and concern for survival, it has become more and more selfish, and immoral behaviors and crimes have intensified. When selfish desires are not satisfied. People have lost their understanding and trust and their sense of security in society. The short-lived enjoyment and glory can't be redeemed: moral decline, psychological distortion, lust expansion, polarization, endless competition of abnormal clusters, abnormal social development, resource depletion, environmental pollution and fierce war. Losing moral constraints is the desire to control development, which leads to irretrievable things. Today, I am afraid of evolutionary superstitions that must be stripped away.

We should face the theory of evolution under the cover of real history. Countless splendid civilizations have disappeared, and only a few remain in our memory, only remembering the legend of Plato's era: the Atlantis civilization developed under the sea. It can be seen that the latest prehistoric human civilization, the Egyptian pyramids, Tiavanaku in Bolivia and the ancient city of Sacsayhuaman (Sacsayhuaman) castle in Rusa, Peru, may be outstanding representatives. These huge stones can better embody astronomy, architecture and metallurgical technology than modern civilization. They have left distant legends, legends and amazing consistency all over the world. Why do they want to destroy civilization? Today's people have forgotten the enlightenment of the ancients, and even relying on the theory of evolution itself, the ancients were ignorant.

The giant statue on Easter Island gazes at the east silently, so people don't forget to carve tears on the statue.