Curry's current honors are 3 crowns, 2MVP, 1 scoring king, 1 stealing king, and 6 best teams. Throughout NBA history, the point guards who can approach his honor are: oscar robertson, stockton, Thomas, Nash and Paul. Can these men surpass him?
Let's grade all the honors, the championship 10, the year when the championship won FMVP20 is 15, the MVP is 20, and the FMVP is 10; 3 points for the best team (3 points for the first time, 2 points for the second time and 1 point for the third time) and 2 points for the best defensive team (2 points for the first defense and 1 point for the second defense); The scoring king scored 4 points, the assisting king scored 2.5 points, the stealing king scored 3 points, the rebounding king scored 2 points, and the blocking king 1 point (explain why the rebounding king scored low? Because some data experts have concluded that the price-performance ratio of blocked shots is very low, it is better to successfully defend the opponent once. After blocking, opponents often get offensive rebounds and launch a second attack; The rebounding king, the opponent gave up a lot of rebounds in the backcourt, and no one argued with you. Why can the steal king be second only to the scoring king? Because stealing is the most cost-effective data on the defensive end, it not only prevents the opponent from scoring once, but also may cause his own offensive score. The value of theft is magnified in the current high-level statistics. ), the best rookie, the fastest progress, the sixth place scored 2 points each, AMVP and all-star starter 1 point, all-star substitute 0.5 point.
I think this "grading standard" should not be a big problem, right? Perhaps the only controversy lies in the championship, because many people don't win the championship as the main force, but these people don't have this situation anyway, and they can all be counted as 5 points. So if you agree with this standard, then:
Curry's score is: 30 (champion) +40(MVP)+4 (scoring champion) +3 (stealing champion)+10 (best team) +6 (all-star) = 93 points.
Paul is: 10 (assists king)+18 (steals king)+19 (best lineup)+16 (best defensive lineup) +2 (best rookie)+1(amvp)+
Nash is: 40(MVP)+ 12.5 (assists king)+15 (best team) +5 (all-stars) = 72.5 points;
Thomas is: 25 (championship)+15(FMVP)+2.5 (assist king)+13 (best team)+1.5 (all-star) +2(AMVP)= 69 points;
Stockton is: 22.5 (assists) +6 (steals) +2 1 (best team) +5 (best defensive team)+1(AMVP)+7 (all-stars) = 62.5 points;
Oscar robertson is: 10 (championship) +20(MVP)+ 15 (assist king) +3 1 (best team)+1 (all-star) +3(AMVP)= 90 points.
It can be seen that only Robertson can reach 90 paragraphs, and others don't even have 80 paragraphs …
Why is Thomas' score so low? I think he is seriously overrated. ...
Of course, this is just a comparison of pure honor. In fact, when we look at the historical status of players, we pay special attention to legend and influence. Among these people, the influence library can overwhelm them a lot. The three-point model he pioneered can be said to have led a new basketball era. I have said many times, maybe when someone compiles a mirror of basketball history 50 years later, Jordan and James will be brushed aside, at most, praising their sensational effect at the same time.
What is the influence of Thomas? Except that Jordan was overwhelmed in that year, he had no outstanding influence in the history of basketball development;
What influence does Robertson have? Before Shao Wei was born, his comprehensiveness really made people feel incredible, which made many point guards try to develop in his direction, but the ability to lead the trend only existed in individual players, such as Magic and Shao Wei, because they ate too much physical talent;
Stockton may be the player who has the greatest influence on basketball development and point guard positioning except Curry, but the traditional point guard is not the most scientific and reasonable type at present, because the current basketball shows us that when there is a clear functional positioning on the court, it is often easier to be targeted by opponents. On the contrary, a new era dual-energy defender like Curry is more viable in modern basketball.
The same is true of Paul and Nash, even if they are influential, they also have their own limitations.
Legend has it that Curry may be behind stockton and Robertson (I personally think he is behind them, not absolutely), but in terms of pure honor and influence, Curry has firmly overwhelmed several others. Can a legend be turned upside down? If so, can Ross rank in the top ten point guards? What about the youngest MVP? Besides, Curry is not without legend. How many three-point records does he currently hold? It is very likely that after 100 years, the top three shooters in history still have their place! And the record of unanimous MVP has not been broken so far.
The last comparison may be the data. Curry can't compare with stockton, Robertson and Paul at present, and even can't surpass them after retirement, but Nash and Thomas can definitely surpass them, so only oscar robertson can approach him among the people listed above, and Nash and Thomas can't surpass him anyway; Paul only has data to surpass; Only stockton's data can surpass the legendary draw; The big o is just a legend and a draw, and the data exceeds.
So in any case, at present, Curry's achievements have ranked among the top three in history, and the only thing that can pose a threat is the big O.
Up to now, Curry may only be regarded as the top three in history, but by the time he retired, Curry had been able to raise his honor score to 100. At that time, he was worse than big O 10, and I think other legends, influences and total data have no comparative significance. He is the second stable point guard in history.
But if you want to be the first point guard in history, there should be no hope …