NBA players are gifted, but there are always a few people with historical talents who have made themselves famous in NBA history. For example, Durant, who has "the height of power forward can surpass that of guard", and Curry, who has "brought NBA into the era of small ball". Because they are in the same era and have been teammates, their historical status will often be compared, and various media also rank them in the top 30 in NBA history. Recently, experts from American media Fadeaway World listed five reasons why Curry's historical position is higher than Durant's. Let's see:

1, Curry can make teammates better.

Before Durant joined the Warriors, Curry's teammates included Barnes, Bogut and Clark. At that time, the Warriors' reserve lineup was already one of the best in the league. Even Clay Thompson, to a great extent, is because of Curry, because Curry can attract more defense and give Thompson more open shooting opportunities.

Durant always has some teammates who can play well without him, such as Shao Wei and Harden of Thunder, Curry and Thompson of Warriors, Owen and Harden of Nets. Durant is a great player, but he may need to work with experienced players. He can't help those players become better.

Curry is one of the best shooters in NBA history.

Let's compare the career shooting percentage of Curry and Durant. Durant's career shooting percentage is 49.3%, which is higher than Curry's 47.6%, but Curry has surpassed Durant in both three-point shooting percentage and free throw shooting percentage. Curry's career shooting percentage is much higher than Durant's 38.2%, and Curry's career shooting percentage is 90.7%, which is better than Durant's 88.2%, so make this comparison.

3. Curry has more MVPs than Durant's 1.

Curry won the MVP and the championship on 20 15, but Curry was even crazier on 20 16. He was unanimously elected as the MVP of the 20 16 season with a shooting percentage of 50+40+90 and an average of 30. 1 minute. Durant scored 28. 1 point with a shooting percentage of 50+40+90 in the same season of 20 13. Unfortunately, he lost his MVP, but Durant will make up for his regret and be elected as the MVP next season, which is Durant's only MVP. Although Durant has more scoring champions than Curry, it is obvious that MVP is more important than scoring champions.

Curry's three championships are more than Durant's two.

Although Durant has two championships, Curry has three. We must know that the value of a championship is enormous, and how many historical superstars have a low historical position because they have no championship for life. And Curry also has a better record in the finals. Curry entered the finals five times and won three times, while Durant entered the finals four times and won two times. If the Nets can win this season, Durant will be better than Curry, because Durant currently has two FMVP, and Curry doesn't.

Curry didn't join a super team.

Before Durant joined the Warriors, the Warriors had always been a super team with 73 wins in a single season, won the championship and had a complete system. Thunder entered the finals as early as 20 12, but did not win the championship. And in 20 16, the thunder 3- 1 leading warrior was finally reversed by the Warriors, and then Durant joined the Warriors. Warriors under Curry's leadership, the Warriors could not enter the playoffs before, but Curry took the Warriors to the championship step by step. He didn't win the championship because he joined a super team like Durant.

Who do you think has a higher historical position, Curry or Durant? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.