1. Introduction to film review writing (1) First introduction to film reviews Middle school students like to watch movies and TV shows, and after watching, they also like to talk about the content of the film, or write some articles about their opinions on the film. However, it is often easy to write film reviews as reflections after watching the movie. In fact, both There is a big difference between them. Post-viewing feelings - focusing on "feeling", the expression is mainly lyrical and narrative, and the content is mostly about the inspiration of the film to the audience, the audience's thoughts after watching the film, etc. Film review - the emphasis is on "review". After discovering the theme, you should evaluate whether the theme is successful or not, whether the environment the theme relies on is real, whether the character creation is consistent with real life, and whether the use of film language is successful, etc. Expand evaluation and discussion. The prerequisite for writing good film and television reviews is to watch carefully. Film and television reviews are different from book reviews. Books can be read over and over again, but movies are fleeting. Therefore, when watching a movie, you cannot be careless, but you must pay full attention, look in all directions, listen to all directions, and pay attention to the pictures, music, dialogue, and sound. In terms of performance and other aspects, you must be aware of the subtleties and capture the shining things in time. In this way, you will be able to use it freely when writing. (2) Film Criticism Examination Guidance Exam Content: The film and television works here may be movies or TV series, or TV essays, or feature films or documentaries, or variety shows, etc. After the candidates observe them, they will write an essay on the spot. An analytical article. Purpose of the exam: Mainly to test the candidates’ ability to understand, appreciate, and theoretically analyze film and television works, as well as their writing ability. As a film and television director, much of it comes from the perception, appreciation and reference of excellent film and television works. Therefore, the analysis of film and television works is the first step in the entrance examination for film and television directors. Exam-taking guidance: In this examination subject, the type of film and television works may be feature films, documentaries, comprehensive art films, etc. Regardless of the type of film and television works provided, the analysis must always be conducted from the perspective of artistic analysis and cannot be a retelling of the content or a general after-viewing impression. Candidates must combine various elements of film and television works such as images, sound, music, commentary, hosting, etc. to make an artistic analysis of their theme content, structural framework, production style, etc. We do not seek to be comprehensive, but seek to be focused and profound, have a unique perspective, and strive to write our own unique feelings and express our own individual ideas. (3) Common film and television review styles include: monograph, review, mixed feelings, ideological review, art review, final review, professional review, popular review, impressionistic review, etc. Monograph-style film and television reviews are based on discussion and are highly theoretical. There is a related special topic that elaborates, analyzes and demonstrates a certain aspect of the review object or a more prominent issue with a certain tendency. Among the writing elements it contains, argument, as a mode of operation, is its most important component. It generally must conduct a more thorough study and give a theoretical answer on the important characteristics, properties, tendencies, problems of the review object itself or the reviewer's personal thinking caused by it. Therefore, considerable theoretical color is its inherent requirement, and the simple "evaluation" of the object is not particularly important. Moreover, it generally does not necessarily require a "comprehensive" inspection of the object. Commentary-style film and television reviews are mainly about ratings and have a single object. They generally make special comments on a film and television work or an important aspect of it. Task: Pay focused aesthetic attention to a given object and make a basic evaluation (lead a clear value judgment from a concise analysis). Three Don’ts: 1. Too many extensions; 2. Too much theoretical development; Too much detailed expansion of established understandings and opinions. Miscellaneous-feeling film and television reviews start with criticism and focus on development. They usually express their thoughts, life, art, experiences, feelings and opinions by borrowing topics, connecting examples, drawing inferences and free reference. Three nos: not paying attention to theoretical discussion, not focusing on the evaluation of the object, and not focusing mainly on the aesthetic examination of the writing object. First grasp: Seize a certain feature, a certain tendency, a certain phenomenon in the ideological content or artistic form of film and television works, make a more systematic and casual connection, comment on related or similar phenomena, focus on expressing personal feelings "Other" views. (4) Preparation for writing a film review 1. Life experience. Put yourself in the shoes of the film as one of the key roles. 2. The need for horizontal expression in words, to be able to express your thoughts and express your own thoughts. 3. Film common sense is to conceive of the article. The basis of 4. Comprehension ability is the guarantee for analyzing the film