Musical fountains are works of art.

Article 4 (8) of the "Regulations for the Implementation of the Copyright Law" stipulates: "Art works refer to paintings, calligraphy, sculptures, etc., which are plane or aesthetically significant objects composed of lines, colors or other methods. The three-dimensional plastic art work.

The presentation of the jet effect of the musical fountain involved is the result of careful design by the designer with the help of sound, light, and other technological factors, showing an artistic beauty that belongs to "literature, art, and science." "Intellectual achievements in the field" category.

Through the unique choice, selection and arrangement of the fountain water shape, lighting and color changes and the emotional combination of music, the designer presents gorgeous colors and music when the music is loud. The high spray of water shows soft light spots and gentle swings when the music is soothing. The softness and high pitch echo each other, allowing the viewer to feel an expression that is completely different from the simple fountain spray effect. , with remarkable originality.

Through the construction layout and point correlation of corresponding fountain equipment and control systems such as water type, lighting, laser, projection, sound, and monitoring, the designer controls the musical fountain system. It can be programmed and controlled by corresponding software to completely reproduce the same spray effect, meeting the "replicability" requirements of the work.

Neither dynamic nor static form, nor the duration of the work, are intentionally excluded as components of the art work. Under the circumstances, it was determined that the presentation of the jet effect of the musical fountain involved in the case fell within the scope of protection of works of art and did not violate the rules of legal interpretation.