Current location - Music Encyclopedia - NetEase Cloud Music - What do you think are the problems with the adaptation of "Braving the Wind and Waves" to "Lighting the Stars"?
What do you think are the problems with the adaptation of "Braving the Wind and Waves" to "Lighting the Stars"?

In the program, the original lyrics of "The sky is dirty now" were changed to "The sky is sunny now." "Stars can no longer be seen in the civilized sky" was changed to "Stars are always visible in the civilized sky".

It is also very common to change the lyrics of the original songs in TV programs. For example, when Aska Yang covered the online song I Want, he changed a few lyrics.

The original version of Gai Junyan was "I want the moon in the sky and frost on the ground, a snow-white girl and a dark bed", and Aska Yang changed it to "I want the moon in the sky and frost on the ground, a study with light transmission and a teenager's madness".

At that time, the revision of this edition of Aska Yang gained a lot of praise.

Zheng Zhihua himself immediately responded positively, expressing "shock, anger and regret". The author's feelings about this matter are the same as those of Zheng Zhihua, and there is one more feeling, that is, nausea. This incident shows us once again the serious problems in our literary and art circles.

Why do you say again? Because such things are too common in our mainland literary and art circles. Some time ago, Faye Wong reinterpreted her previous song "On Earth" and rectified the lyrics.

change "there may not be a beautiful sky after a storm, but there will be a rainbow after a sunny day" to "there must be a beautiful sky after a storm, and there will always be a rainbow after a sunny day." Why are you doing this? After the storm, there is not necessarily a beautiful sky. Why change it?

in a word, they have a purpose, everything is praise and everything is praise. In the world they think, only stars and rainbows can appear.

is it really not disgusting? Is this kind of literature and art normal? Literature and art should express people's true feelings and create artistically on the basis of reality. Not flattery. Even literary and art workers with backbone and conscience should create works that are conducive to the improvement of the whole society.

how to make it develop better, of course, is to point out its problems directly or sideways. If a person is ill, you don't seriously study how he got sick, what symptoms he has, how sick he is and how he can be cured. Ignore these things, but cover them up, even tell lies, and praise him for his health. I thought it was stupid.

I really can't understand why only truth, goodness and beauty can appear in literary and artistic works, even if it is made up by fiction, it should appear openly. So fond of being flattered? Can't accept a little criticism, so fragile and so timid!

There is a "sunny day", but is it always sunny, sunny everywhere, and there is no haze at all? Ask yourselves, is this normal? In their sky, beautiful stars are everywhere!

this phenomenon has been going on for a long time, which is very abnormal. Great country, and this petty behavior is too inconsistent. Literature and art are created by people, and its audience is all people. Any literature and art comes from the creator's heart and emotion, and he expresses what he feels. Whether it is music, painting, film and television, writing, it is the same.

Do some people think that it is right not to let these literary and art workers express themselves, or let them just tell lies, which is beneficial to their management? Maybe, maybe for the time being. But don't forget, no one likes falsehood, human beings are gradually moving towards wisdom, and no one likes to be deceived and fooled.