In the current law, spoofing does not constitute copyright infringement, although it can? A spoof? Works belong to the category of alternative literary criticism, but their legal nature cannot be exactly the same as that of ordinary literary criticism. A spoof? Whether the works are copyrighted needs to be discussed. ? A spoof? Our online behavior is based on ready-made film works, and the copyright of these materials really belongs to others. If these? A spoof? The material of the work is the original audio and video files, so it can be considered as a new work. Even if this kind of film and television works have no artistic value, at least their legal ownership will not be problematic, and they will not infringe the copyright of others. Theoretically, there is no hard and fast rule about whether a work is original, but it depends on whether the work is completed independently.

In recent years, with the continuous development of network culture, network spoof? The phenomenon is all the rage, all kinds? A spoof? Works emerge one after another. ? A spoof? With its exaggerated and humorous style, the works often make people laugh, and are deeply loved and welcomed by netizens. ? Internet spoof? Definition and characteristics of? Internet spoof? In fact, it is a new network culture, which can achieve funny, ironic, commentary and other effects. Using video editing, image processing, recording synthesis, action imitation and other technical means. ? For what? Internet spoof? There are different opinions about whether the work infringes the copyright of the original. Some people think? A spoof? A work does not infringe the copyright of the original, because it is an innovation of the original and constitutes a reasonable use of copyright. Some people think? A spoof? A work is an act of copyright infringement, because the original work is modified and used without the consent of the original copyright owner.

If copyright or copyright-related rights are infringed, the infringer shall compensate according to the actual losses of the obligee; If the actual loss is difficult to calculate, it may be compensated according to the illegal income of the infringer. The amount of compensation shall also include the reasonable expenses paid by the obligee to stop the infringement. If the actual loss of the obligee or the illegal income of the infringer cannot be determined, the people's court shall award compensation of less than 500,000 yuan according to the circumstances of the infringement.