Three views are inconsistent, mental torture; The three views are consistent, and Qi Xin works together. You will start to think, are we from two different worlds? Maybe we are not suitable at all. In fact, in the final analysis, it is a matter of disagreement. Because he won't respect your hobbies, you can't appreciate his happiness and he can't appreciate your pain.
In fact, many people can't really understand the so-called three views. In many people's understanding, the three views are different: for example, you like to enjoy the use of money to the fullest, while the other party has a planned and rational view of money.
Or, for example, if you like all kinds of food with heavy taste, barbecue, kebabs and mala Tang are indispensable, while he pays attention to the nutritional collocation of various healthy foods, vegetables and fruits in protein. For another example, you like those long-legged Oba in Korean dramas, but he likes all kinds of secondary comics.
This is the so-called difference between the three views. In my opinion, these are actually just differences in aesthetics and living habits. What is the real difference between the three views? The real difference between the three views is that you said you were going to a roadside stall, and he said what you were eating those junk foods for? It's unsanitary and unhealthy.
You said you wanted to travel, but he said why? Lying at home is uncomfortable and free. You have saved money for a long time to buy a long-awaited bag. He said it was just a bag. Why do you have to buy it so expensive? It is better to buy more dishes and add a meal.
You laughed, as if laughing at him and yourself. I saw a joke on the Internet, which was very good. What is the difference between the three views? I said, the sea is beautiful. You said, it's a pity that many people drowned.
In fact, the real agreement of the three views is actually to respect each other's three views. I think it must be very smooth with Sanguan, but now I find that everything is not boring. Now I feel that in the process of communication, both people will make concessions while considering each other. Or equal communication without bias.
For example, when discussing a problem, the other party will not say, I don't want to convince you because of you blabla, but you are wrong. I won't say anything, because you are right about everything. Both of them actually hinder the most essential communication. As long as two people can communicate equally, others will influence each other.