I know them both. It seems that fewer people are interested in Shanghai J60 152, and fewer people ask about this watch. Personally, I think there is something wrong with this watch. The ears of this watch are different from ordinary ones. They are very small. But the problem is that this watch is very thick, and this ear is even thicker. There are also problems with the design of the dial. If the date is displayed in a small window, most of the other small dials are used for timing. This watch looks like a password watch. In this way, it is neither fish nor fowl to adjust the weekly calendar nor the monthly calendar by pressing the up and down buttons-it can also be seen on other watches. It seems that Shanghai sports have this bad habit. Also, since there are 24 hours at 6 o'clock in the outer circle, why put the sun, moon and stars in the inner circle? The Swiss movement is full of moon phases. Such details illustrate the technical gap with foreign movements. The strangest thing is that the outer ring of the dial actually has a scale for measuring speed, but the watch has no timing function. This should be said to be a relatively low-level mistake. It is entirely because the stopwatch dial is equipped with a multi-calendar movement.

As for the seagull M 186SP, it is a classic model. Not much to say. The design and connotation are good, and the price is very cheap. It is also a star product in domestic watches.

In a word, I think seagull M 186SP is good. But if the table is only measured by good or bad, it is still more difficult. Maybe it's better to use it well or not. All I can do is show my attitude. If you really like Shanghai J60 152-S, you can buy it. After all, it is also a style-a bit like mashup.

That's it. I hope it helps you.