A man met a woman through Momo. After the two met and had sex, the woman called the police and claimed that she was assaulted by the man. Later, the man was found guilty of rape by the court of first instance, but the court of second instance found him not guilty. Asking a netizen to have sex

The man Feng added the woman Li as a friend on Momo. After chatting, Feng wanted to ask Li to meet, but Li never agreed. Later, Feng found that Li was near his home, so he contacted Li to meet. After Li agreed, he quickly took a taxi to Feng's community. After picking up Li, the two returned to Feng's home together. After greetings, the two sat on the sofa chatting and watching the horror movie that Li wanted to watch. Afterwards, the two had sex on the sofa.

Li took the elevator and left Feng’s home. In the elevator, Li wiped his eyes and face with paper towels. After that, Li started to accuse Feng of raping him on Momo, and asked Feng to choose a solution, either calling the police, giving him 20,000 yuan, or asking Li's husband to find Feng. The woman regretted asking for 20,000 yuan

Feng said that Li asked for too much money, and Li did not say he did not agree when they had sex. After the argument failed, Li chose to call the police. Although Feng and his defender always argued that he was innocent during the first trial, the court of first instance still found that Feng had forced sex with Li against his will, and found that Feng was guilty of rape. The verdict of the second instance was changed to not guilty

From the statements of the two people, Feng did not use violence or coercion against Li, nor did he use coercive means to make Li dare not, be unable to resist, or not know how to resist. According to the chat records, Li met Feng voluntarily and went even though he knew Feng was at home. Although the chat records afterwards reflected that Li was unwilling to have a relationship with Feng, this did not mean that Li was unwilling at the time.

Furthermore, although Li always said that he was unwilling, he did not elaborate on his obvious resistance. Li did not struggle and call for help. Feng also said that Li was very cooperative. Based on this situation, it is difficult to determine whether it violated Li's will. Based on this, the court of second instance believed that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Feng was guilty of rape and ruled that Feng was not guilty.