Well, let me talk about LZ's view objectively. There is no doubt that PS2 is recognized as the best-selling host, with poor picture, low resolution and uneven teeth. Indeed, it's not good now. After all, it is the product of 12. How about ps3? Don't ask about the picture quality. It is obviously unreasonable to compare the mainframe of the last era with the WII of this era, but compared with the PS3, the WII has an age gap in image quality. Of course, function is not everything. WII and PS2 are both winners of their respective host wars. Classics are beyond doubt. As for lz's god of war biochemical blood and so on, it is entirely his own hobby. If so, wouldn't it be terrible to watch a chainsaw cry? Now Mario, Pocket, Zelda, which 3A masterpiece has no bloody elements? Besides, LZ is so annoying Sony, why buy a PS2 to play so many games? I don't want to have a war of words with LZ here. Perhaps these games have brought a lot of unhappiness to LZ. As for bloody games, it can only be said that different people have different opinions. By the way, isn't Resident Evil 4 and Dark Chronicles also available on WII? The bloody hero is absent, and the most restrictive crazy machine.

As for WII, the fun games are, of course, Kobe of the Stars and Sword of Zelda, Mario Galaxy 1.2 (absolute masterpieces). And Mario and Sonik Olympic Games, Mario Racing. In fact, things like Monster Hunter 3 are also very good, but they are not recommended.

Actually, I'm curious Why doesn't LZ talk about Microsoft and Apple? To tell the truth, I am tired of online games, so I am nothing? I don't have this qualification, which only means that I am bored. As for LZ, your evaluation of Sony is extreme. If I were you, I would smash the PS2. LZ didn't have to choose me at all. I just explained it objectively.