The first is that forced drinkers, such as those who deliberately drink or stimulate drinking, should bear corresponding legal responsibilities for any consequences of being advised to drink.
The second is the person who persuades the drinker to drink even though he knows that he can't drink or is unwell. This kind of person should bear legal responsibility for the consequences of the other person's illness caused by drinking and drunk driving.
The third kind is people who drive away with * * * after drinking wine. In this case, if there is a traffic accident, the drinker should not only bear the responsibility for his own drinker, but also bear the corresponding responsibility for the other party who suffered the accident.
Fourth, people who fail to safely escort drunks after drinking. If the drinker has lost or is about to lose his ability to control himself, he is unconscious and unable to control his behavior, and the drinker fails to send him to the hospital or send him home safely, then the drinker who has an accident must bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
The fifth type is people who know that they are drunk and still instigate drivers to drive after drinking. Such people not only have to bear civil liability for the consequences of traffic accidents, but also may be investigated for criminal responsibility if they knowingly instigate drivers to drive when they are drunk.
Sixth, the organizers of the wine bureau should bear the obligation of moderate drinking and safe escort after drinking, otherwise they should bear corresponding legal responsibilities after the accident.
Wine is a good wine, and a banquet is a good banquet, but drinking is risky, so be cautious in persuading wine. This article just reminds everyone that drinking alcohol should be moderate and appropriate to avoid being sued.