In study, work and even life, everyone must have been exposed to composition. Composition is a transition from internal speech to external speech, that is, from a compressed and concise language that one can understand to a developed and standardized grammatical structure that others can understand. Still at a loss for composition? The following is the 10 debate composition I collected for you. Welcome to reading. I hope you will like them.
Debate essay 1 Confucius said, "Make friends and keep your word." Honesty and trustworthiness are the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, and honesty is the criterion of being a man. But in life, so-called "white lies" often appear. In order to express your opinions, Class 7 (8) held a debate contest. Please watch the live broadcast now-
"Please start to explain your point of view ..."
"We believe that honesty is the first essence of being a man, and honesty is needed everywhere in life. Everyone has heard the story of "the wolf is coming". Although it is a white lie, it is still a lie! " This pre-emptive exposition comes from Xu Can, the "No.1 seed" in the square.
My opponent is really a master. After careful consideration, our "third seed" Tao Jing was not to be outdone, and immediately retorted: "Although telling lies is not good, white lies are indispensable in life, so I think our views are absolutely ok!"
The opponent's debater reacted quickly and blurted out at an alarming rate: "A lie just can't be told. Although it is well-intentioned, it is still a lie in essence and does not conform to the traditional virtues of our country. " Ruan, the "second strength debater", is eloquent and pointed at us with persuasive language.
"I very (very) disagree with each other. I believe that honesty is a traditional virtue, but it does not rule out white lies, because behind such lies is kindness and beauty, which is a mediator in life. " Jumped up from his chair and gnashed his teeth to reject the other person's point of view. I was a little excited because I thought I was the first debater of the other side. ...
The words in the rebuttal were fierce, and the students spoke freely and expressed their opinions. ...
In a short time, the students who passed the "advertising time" began to rub their hands again, and the box appeared again: "Do you think honesty is more important than white lies? What will the world be like with white lies? " The debater for the affirmative raised this question again.
"With white lies, the world will be better!" The funny king and the second seed-Li Yongye must have answered the question. (The audience burst into laughter and applause avalanche. )
After the last debate, the two sides concluded the debate by summing up.
The debate between the two sides is over here. Both sides insist on their own views, so that we can become honest and friendly teenagers!
My parents are our first teachers and we will always rely on them, and my family is the harbor where we live and the place where we can go back at any time. Family affairs can best express the warmth in the family. I still remember the debate.
"Since everyone has nothing to do, let's have a family debate!" Dad made a good suggestion. "well, let's have a' who is more tired in the family, father, mother or child?' All right. "The younger brother said," I'll judge. "
This debate is divided into three parties, the positive one is tired for the father, and the player has a father; The Chinese side is tired of the mother, and the players have mothers; I'm tired across the street, son. I'm on the team.
The debate officially began. The first one to argue was Zheng Fang's father. Dad said, "Dad has to go to work every day from Monday to Friday, and I want to show you around during the holidays. In the evening, he has to check whether your homework has been finished, and sometimes he has to work overtime. Can you not be tired? " My brother's judge said, "I'm really tired. Please invite the next China to represent my mother. " Mother stood up, looked at each of us and said, "In the morning, I get up at 6 o'clock every day to make breakfast for you;" Wake you all up at 7 o'clock; After you go to school, I will wash the dishes; I go to work at 8 o'clock; I'll cook for you before I come back from work at 5: 30. At dinner, you still hate this and that. After supper, I washed the dishes again. You went to bed. I have to clean up. None of you came to help. Tell me, is mom the most tired in this family? "The younger brother said," Mom is more tired than Dad. We invited the sister of the other debater to participate in the debate. " I took a bitter look at my parents and said, "You are tired, and I am more tired than you. Listen to the teacher at school in the morning and go home with a schoolbag at noon. After dinner at home, I want to sleep at noon. You want me to recite words, ancient poems and formulas. It is normal to go back to school in the afternoon and do homework after school. However, it is very tiring to make noise when doing homework! "The younger brother concluded:" It seems that everyone is very tired. We should help other family members to relieve stress. "The debate ended successfully.
After this debate, every member of the family helps each other, family conflicts are reduced, and everyone is very happy every day. This is really a family matter of endless benefit!
Debate Competition Composition 3 Debate Competition is a big stage for talking in life, on which we can make ourselves more confident, improve our eloquence, increase our knowledge and make more friends. Debate is not only a collision of thoughts, but also a confrontation of hearts. As long as you bring your arguments, the big stage of life is yours.
To tell the truth, I have never participated in a debate before. Actually, I didn't run this school, but the people in our department were too busy to postpone it, so I started the first debate in my life. However, I'm not ready to play. I made a substitute. I think I will help them check the information. I thought they'd be fine. But faith is beautiful, but reality is cruel. Every time we tried to find her in the fourth debate, she was not there and the news didn't come back. We haven't seen anyone from the preliminary round to the final round. Sometimes we even feel that we have met a pig teammate. Yes, I have been in charge of four debates. I have been waiting nervously for the start of the preliminary round, but there is a ridiculous result. My opponent's people didn't come. We won this time, which is embarrassing. After the debate, there was really no glory to lose, so I entered the semi-finals in a daze. It's a pity that the lottery met another team in our department, but they spoke highly of it before, saying it was the best team in the debate. Since then, I've given up on myself, thinking it's okay to lose to my own department anyway. Anyway, no matter what the result is, there will be people from our department in the finals, so I am relatively less nervous and have no idea of winning at all. However, the result is always unconventional. We actually won, others were reading the manuscript, and I actually dropped it. I'm a little surprised. I always feel that I am not fully prepared. And we also watched the teams that entered the finals. Everything was mediocre. We all thought that we had beaten the strongest team, so we were sure to win the finals. I was completely relaxed. However, the ending is always strikingly similar. We lost. This is the only disappointment since the debate, but it is quite gratifying to be in the final.
I learned a lot in this debate. Arguing with others is not as difficult as I thought. It is also important that no matter who your opponent is, you should be in the best condition and be fully prepared. Don't give up early because your opponent is strong, and don't take it lightly because your opponent is weak, because the result is often unreasonable.
Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." Why do I feel that this ladder is good or bad?
The teacher said, "On Teacher's Day, we held a lecture entitled" Is it beneficial to open books? " Many students chose affirmation. If no one is against it, then the debate can't be held. I'm struggling. I have to prepare both materials.
That afternoon, I was lying in bed reading Pinocchio. I saw the second chapter of the book: the puppet ran out of the house alone, its father chased after it, and the police stopped the puppet. Dad criticized the puppet after catching up with him, but passers-by still pointed at dad, and finally dad was sent to prison. Without his father's care, the puppet was so hungry that he had to beg for something to eat, but people often played tricks on him and threw cold water on him. Hungry and cold, he fell asleep by the fire and his leg was burned. Dad came back, and when he saw the scene in front of him, tears could not help falling. I made his feet again, and they stuck together completely ... from this story, I learned to listen to my parents and not follow my temper. I find "opening books is beneficial".
But I think sometimes it's no use opening books. I am fascinated by detective stories. When I sleep at night, I feel a cool breeze blowing from my back. I feel so scared that I dare not sleep. I really want to sleep between my parents. If I don't read that detective novel, I won't be afraid. Also, in the process of reading, we learned a lot of knowledge outside the text, but a lot of bad information also came in, for example, someone read the book and learned the crimes of the bad guys in the book; Some people are addicted to stories, unwilling to make progress and don't want to learn.
Our class debate puzzled me, but for the sake of the class, I finally chose the point of view: "opening books may not be beneficial!" " "I don't know if my dim view can win. Oh! Tangled!
Today, Teacher Lin told us that there would be a debate today. The students cheered and were full of confidence. It seems that the war of words is about to begin.
The debate has begun, and our theme is "Is it beneficial to open books?" We are divided into two groups, one is the square group, and the staff are: Zhao Bofan, Lu Jianchi, Lin Xuancheng and Guo. One group is the other, and the personnel are Zhu Xiaochan, Min Fei, Lin Zhichao, Zhu Jiaqi and Yu Ting. Then I am naturally a judge and an audience!
First, the argument is stated positively, and then the argument is denied negatively. A few minutes later, the debate officially began.
First of all, Guo, on his side, talked about the beneficial truth of opening books. On the other hand, Min Fei, the opponent, is unwilling to show disapproval. "It's no use opening a book, because …" In this way, the debate became more and more fierce, and sometimes the other side was speechless. Slowly, it is time for the climax of the debate. Lin Zhichao and Lin Xuancheng are fighting with each other, just like fierce competition. They can't tell the outcome at all. Suddenly, opponent Yu Ting refuted a point: "A good book can't be written, just like a bad guy can't carve a bad guy on his face." Yu Ting said that, and immediately burst into warm applause. He speaks so well. ...
Time flies, the class is over in a blink of an eye, and our debate is over. Finally, we judged the "best debater" and "best popularity award". Do you want to know? Then I will tell you! The best debaters-Lin Xuancheng and Lin Zhichao. "Best Popularity Award"-Yu Ting. The point is, of course, who won? I voted for it, but the opponent won. I think this debate is very successful, and we should hold more such debates in the future.
Debate essay 6 "Argumentation comes first, eloquence and sophistry are based on emotion, and all arguments depend on works;" On the balance of the world, the devil talks about fallacy and relativity, not the hero's winning or losing ... "With the opening remarks of the host Cai Xiong, the debate officially began.
The four people in the square, Sylar, Xiong Jie, Qing Zhipeng and Zeng Chen, truly embody the scientific characteristics of 1 1 class. But I don't seem to see an eloquent hand in this battle. Sylar usually mirth, occasionally cross-dressing the female role. Our little Zhen Chen is not easy. He sat in the audience for a long time last year. Finally, I argued with Zhang Zimin in the questioning session, and the scene was quite intense. Today, he finally took the lead. Well, fat and thin, not tired from work, I still look forward to their performance.
Let's look at the opposite side again: Fan Tianyu, Wang J, Happy Liu, Zeng Qingzhen, who is calm and calm, and my deskmate Xia. The strength of this team is still quite strong. Fan Tianyu's mouth alone can argue with others.
A positive argument, Xiong Jie's statement. When he made his statement, his pronunciation was clear, his intonation was cadence, and he quoted classics, which showed the rigorous logical thinking of science students.
The opposing party argued that Brother J may have forgotten to drink "Pulse" before the game, and he has been out of state and wants to laugh. To this end, he was so annoyed that he couldn't help but abuse himself and slapped himself several times.
Liu, the opponent's second argument, chickened out. He actually made a slip of the tongue and admitted that the advantages of idolatry outweigh the disadvantages. What a strength pit teammate! It seems that there are many positive plans, and it is not easy to put an undercover. Founder Erbianqing always seizes the opportunity to seize the braid of happiness and bombard it indiscriminately.
In the qualitative debate, the two sides also showed their magical powers and did not give in to each other. Of course, Xia Tian, our opponent's four arguments, can't stand it any longer. It truly embodies the spirit of "women don't let men" and fights alone with the four Confucianism.
Haha, women are always the best debaters. Regrettably, it's time for the opposing side to speak, leaving only the active side to play a one-man show. This is beyond my expectation. "Unity is strength, Mount Tai is the top", and the fruit is good.
Next is the most wonderful audience question session.
You said there was nothing wrong with Fan Tianyu's mention, but he mentioned Yi Bo and Sean Shaw. You know my two roommates, that's iron powder in iron powder.
I was the first to stand up and question crazily for a while, and the momentum was really chilling. Finally, Brother J said weakly, I just want to be Heikun. Brother j seldom gives up.
One round of bombing is not enough. Zhang Qinyu has another round. I see Fan Tianyu's resurgent expression, and I guess he is probably doubting life.
I will join such a lively scene. "Persimmons should be picked soft first." I asked Liu: Do you have an idol? I wanted to wait for him to tell his idol, and then give him a blast. Who wants him to say that his idol is Kun? I was so angry that I caught his dishonesty and attacked him severely.
The audience on the other side also stood up. Wang Lu asked Founder Xiong Jie, which is well-founded and positive. I almost defected.
Finally, the two sides summarized their respective four arguments, with xu teacher commenting, and the debate officially ended.
The debate was as successful as last year's competition. We should treat idols rationally and worship those worthy of worship.
I forgot to thank two little assistants and Li.
Debate Composition 7 Today, we held a wonderful debate in Changjiang Class 2.
With the order of Teacher Apple, our Chen Kexin stood up and said, "Playing games can broaden our horizons!" " "... the opposition was silent. Suddenly, Li Jiahui raised his right hand: "Playing games will affect your eyesight!" I said sternly, "As long as you don't play with your mobile phone for a long time, your eyesight will not be affected, and you can learn a lot by learning software. Ying Da, an opponent, said cheerfully, "It's dangerous to play mobile phones on the road. "Our Ding Binbin was suddenly mentioned by the teacher, but he said calmly," Do you have to play on the road? "Mobile phones can help primary school students solve many problems!" Opponent Li Jiahui stood up again and said anxiously, "Mobile phones have radiation, which will affect the physical and mental health of primary school students." I went all out to say, "Mobile phones have little radiation, and everything in the world has radiation. Mobile phones can also be used to learn software such as CDs! " "
This time, I won the title of debate king, and I also know that mobile phones are a double-edged sword. Some people use it to stab themselves, while others use it to learn knowledge.
Debate composition 8 "I declare that the opposing side has won the debate!" " I raised my hand against it and said loudly. Opposing debaters embraced and cheered; The debater in favor was eclipsed and dejected.
This is a small debate. The debaters are all children in grade three, but the seriousness of the debate is not diminished. The theme of the debate is "Can we play too many games?" Those in favor say "No" and those against say "It doesn't matter". I am the host.
The debate officially kicked off. The positive statement is a little girl with a ghost horse spirit. She stood up confidently and said, "I think playing too many games will reduce your grades." For example, the former monitor of our class was the first in the class, and his character and study were excellent. Because of too many games, I didn't want to study, not only did my grades drop quickly, but I also lost my position as the monitor. "In favor of the debater applause.
Next, it's the opponent's turn to debate. He is an energetic little boy. He jumped up from his chair with a bang and couldn't wait to say, "here comes my old grandson!" My point is that excessive games will not affect learning. " The debater could not restrain his excitement and began to object. The pros and cons quarreled. I quickly stopped him: "Don't get excited, the attack and defense time hasn't started yet."
After the debaters have stated their views, they will come to the most exciting offensive and defensive links. At first, the debaters were seriously refuting each other. When the game became fierce, the debaters began to blush with anxiety. Some of them are prone on the table, some are standing on chairs, and some even point to the other debater and say, "I want to refute that chick!" " "
The debate is coming to an end, but they suddenly digress and start to discuss whether playing games will make their eyes smaller. The opponent argued with wide eyes and made a gesture, "Look! My eyes are so big! Playing games has made my eyes bigger! " The argument against it is a bit like Ronghao Li's. Facing the positive accusation, he said with grievance: "I was born with such small eyes!" " Looking at these lovely children, I am really in distress situation.
Although the debater is still a child, his views are still a little immature. However, the debate was wonderful, and sweet laughter continued.
It's a pity that I didn't participate in this debate, so I shared my views with you. I think it is wrong to play too many games, and it is also lacking not to play games. Playing games in moderation is a kind of relaxation and entertainment. As the debater said, in order to play games, you should wear a blue-ray mobile phone and do eye exercises four times a day to protect your eyes. Playing games in moderation can make you happy and have more motivation to learn.
I look forward to the next time, and I can argue so freely!
I once watched the debater Kan Kan talked about in the debate, using quoted language to make the other side speechless. I have always admired it, but because of stage fright, my heart is willing but my strength is weak. Now, I'm trying for the first time. Maybe a little nervous, maybe a little stuttering, maybe a little hasty, but I know that this is my first step to success. No one has ever been able to reach heaven in one step.
Similarly, this debate also let me find the "ten years' hard work" behind the debater's scenes. It takes more practice to exchange arguments online, improve each other's manuscripts and explain this point calmly. Every paragraph and every word should be carefully examined and critically examined. Through our communication, I deeply feel the importance of teamwork. Sometimes, you need a teammate to check, sometimes you need a practice to understand, and sometimes you need a team to communicate. Teammates will always be your strong backing.
Debate is also a game to test manners and patience. Stay calm, don't laugh, don't be sarcastic, and respect each other's debaters to win more support. When refuting the other party, the real victory is to use rigorous and appropriate wording to make the other party speechless. If you just stay in the anger of unsuccessful, it will only make the game full of rage.
Debate essay 10 This morning, my mother and I had a debate. The theme is "How about making cakes often". Pro: It's good to make cakes. Counterparty: making cakes is not good.
First of all, Zhengfang made a speech: "Making cakes can improve one's artistic level and serve others, so that everyone can taste healthy and green food without additives. The food safety outside is worrying. "
Then I stated my opinion: "The other debater is right, but making cakes all day will damage people's cervical vertebrae, and the noise of making cakes will disturb others' rest." "Making cakes often will make people forget to eat and sleep, and eventually ruin their health. In this way, the most cakes serve others and hurt themselves. I want to ask the other debater, what's your answer? "
My mother stood up and replied emotionally, "The cervical vertebra is not injured by making cakes, such as playing with mobile phones and computers ..." "The question answered by another debater is beside the point." "Making cakes in my spare time can not only do what I like, but also increase my income. Why not? "
"But as far as I know, other debaters often don't cook dinner or eat lunch because they make cakes. And other debaters generally don't play mobile phones? "
In the end, my mother and I tied.
;