How to use one sentence to defeat those who do not stick to trivial details to achieve big things
Since ancient times, details determine success or failure. If you can't do small things well, how can you achieve big things! To the latter sentence, do not stick to trivial matters.
The sentence behind "to achieve great things without sticking to trivial matters" is "to make friends widely without asking about right and wrong", which comes from "Book of the Later Han Dynasty".
"The Book of the Later Han" is a biographical history book that records the history of the Eastern Han Dynasty. The book is divided into Ten Chronicles, Eighty Biographies and Eight Chronicles (continued by Sima Biao), recording the 195-year history from the rise of Wang Mang to Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty.
The author of this chronicle and biographies is Fan Ye, who lived in the Liu and Song Dynasties in the Southern Dynasty. This book combines seven historical materials of the Later Han Dynasty that were circulated at that time, and refers to the "Records of the Later Han Dynasty" written by Yuan Juji. It is concise, detailed, and has a vivid narrative. , so it replaced the previous histories of the Later Han Dynasty.
During the Northern Song Dynasty, someone combined the eight chapters and 30 volumes of "The Continuation of the Book of Han" by Sima Biao of the Jin Dynasty with it to form the current "Book of the Later Han".
Fan Ye (398 AD - 445 AD), courtesy name Weizong, was born in Shunyang (now east of Xichuan, Henan) in the Southern Song Dynasty. From the official position to General Zuowei, Prince Zhan Shi.
In the ninth year of Yuanjia (432), Emperor Wen of the Song Dynasty, Fan Ye "moved to the left to be the prefect of Xuancheng and failed, so he deleted all the books of the Later Han Dynasty and made them one family's work" and began to write the "Book of the Later Han Dynasty". , was executed for treason in the 22nd year of Yuanjia (445), and the Ten Chronicles and Eighty Biographies were written. The ten ambitions originally planned were not completed in time.
The eight chapters and thirty volumes in the current "Book of the Later Han" were extracted and added by Liang Liu Zhao of the Southern Dynasty from Sima Biao's "The Book of the Later Han".
Fan Ye was born in a famous gentry family. The great ancestor Fan Di was the governor of Yongzhou in the Western Jin Dynasty and became the general of Zuo. His great-grandfather Fan Wang entered the Eastern Jin Dynasty and was promoted to General of Anbei of Jin Dynasty, Governor of Xu Yanzhou, and Marquis of Wuxing County. His grandfather Fan Ning served as the prefect of Linhuai and the prefect of Yuzhang successively. An example of failure of those who achieve great things regardless of trivial matters
Xiang Yu committed suicide in defeat.
Those who achieve great things do not stick to trivial matters. They should not be so discouraged that they kill themselves. They should work hard and make a comeback.
"I still miss Xiang Yu and refuse to cross the Yangtze River." Although Li Qingzhao admired Xiang Yu's bravery, he still felt pity for him. If Xiang Yu didn't stick to trivial matters, then he might not have completely lost.
***, how do you explain the concept of "one country, two systems" for those who do not stick to trivial matters?
This sentence can easily cause misunderstandings by people who "do not stick to trivial matters"
It should be Refers to:
Doing big things should ignore small red tape, but in some people’s mouth, it has become an excuse for doing big things without doing small things.
Haha, we must treat and quote it correctly. This sentence, as the ancients said, is very reasonable: he who achieves great things does not stick to trivial matters. How do you understand this sentence?
It means someone who can accomplish great things. In terms of small etiquette, it is more chic.
That is, he may use all means to succeed, and he will do whatever it takes to achieve his goal. Debate: Those who achieve great things do not stick to trivial matters. We support those who achieve great things without adhering to trivial details. I want to find an example of those who do not adhere to trivial details. I am anxious to death. I will debate the day after tomorrow.
"A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." "(Details, details)
"Opportunity favors only those who are prepared.
"(Does preparation have to be preparation for small sections? This is for us to prepare for the whole area and has nothing to do with small sections)
"If you are not careful, you will lose everything." (Details, details)
"If you don't worry about the small things, you will become a big trouble; if you don't take care of the small things, you will lose the great virtues." (It's still the details. If we pay attention to the details in everything, will opportunities slip away because of being obsessive about the details? )
"A thousand-mile embankment is destroyed by an ant nest" (Is an ant nest a small section? And is it related to the success of a major event?)
"The universe is so big, considering how small it is" (this It means that big things are composed of small things, and small things are not small details)
Zhang Liang was able to pass on "Tai Gong's Art of War" because he picked up shoes for the old man Huangshi, and became one of the "Three Heroes of the Early Han Dynasty" (Zhang Liang was awarded Is it a big deal if you master the Art of War? )
"When you are at the top, you can see all the mountains and small ones. " (The opposite side says that a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.)
Yu committed suicide after being defeated.
Those who achieve great things do not stick to trivial matters. They should not be so discouraged and commit suicide. They should try their luck and make a comeback.
"I still miss Xiang Yu and refuse to cross Jiangdong." Although Li Qingzhao admired Xiang Yu's bravery, he still felt sorry for him. If Xiang Yu had not followed the rules, he might not have completely lost.
Take a look and give points if you are satisfied... Those who achieve great things do not stick to small details. Weaknesses in debates
The ancients said: "Those who achieve great things do not stick to small details." "This sentence makes sense, but people today often distort their understanding of this sentence. The so-called "inconsistency" here refers to those "small details" that have no meaning with "making big things", and those with "making big things" The closely related "little details" must be grasped. If a movie is good, you need to pay attention to details. If a person wants to be successful, he needs to pay attention to details. If a company wants to develop, someone may need to pay attention to details. Of course, life must be macroscopic. The vision is conceived, but the more value and meaning of life lies in the ordinary and trivial matters of life. It is these details that make life full of flesh and blood, and make life rich and colorful. . Otherwise, life must be blank or boring. It is actually a wrong idea to think that small things can be ignored and details will not affect the overall situation. If you only desire greatness and pursue greatness, greatness will disappear; be willing to be ordinary and serious. Do every detail well, but greatness will come unexpectedly. This is the charm of details, and it is the surprise that comes naturally. Although the details are small, they often determine success or failure. Can achieve greatness. "There are no bankrupt industries, only bankrupt companies." This sentence truly reflects the huge impact of details on corporate competition. It can be seen that those who achieve great things still have to "stick to the details" and pay attention to the "little details". Screen, identify, and be selective about "big things". If you want to achieve big things, you should not stick to small details. Answers to the analysis questions
Many big things depend on the person. Money is what makes big things happen. Those who don’t stick to trivial matters are urgently needed. Thank you very much.
The best answer for the affirmative: This is my opening argument as the opponent’s first argument. The first thing I want to remind my fellow debaters is “Those who make big things happen are also important.” The phrase "stick to trivial matters" uses the rhetoric of imitating words, which means that he puts new medicine in old bottles and tells us the rules for dealing with people in today's society. How could the opponent's fellow debater ignore the 2,000 years of development history of human society and settle for it? What about such a lame explanation? We believe that "Ji" means emphasis, and "Ye" means focusing on small details when it comes to big things, not every detail. The other debater took great pains to explain the difference between small details and details. It's a pity that there are some things that your eyes can't see through. It's also a woodblock. How do we know that one of them is a matter of life and death? Because it has been tested in practice and the lessons of blood have allowed us to elevate one of the previously equal sections to a higher level of detail. In other words, the details are precisely the underlying details, which are definitely different from the transformation in the other party.
If the opposing debater is prepared to serve as a lesson for those who come after you, and to use his or her own tragic failure to witness the spirit of sacrifice that new details bring about, then there is no need to stick to trivial matters! However, the classic theory of modern society - the 100-1=0 business management theory tells us: Those who achieve great things also stick to small details. There are three reasons: 1) From the perspective of the main characteristics of those who achieve great things, the competition in today's society is unimaginably fierce, but there are too many people with the qualities to achieve great things, and there is only one opportunity, so the qualities reflected in this section are The role of decision. How did Archibald, the successor to Rockefeller, the famous president of Mobil Oil, rise to the top in one fell swoop? Because wherever he goes on business trips, he always adds "4 dollars per barrel" to the end of his name registration. It was his sense of responsibility in small details that impressed Rockefeller. 2) From a realistic perspective, although human energy is limited, the spirit of materialist dialectics tells us that details play a decisive role. Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, will activate its management system for a customer's product inquiry and call back within 5 minutes. So it can be chained globally. McDonald's spent five years doing market research before entering the Chinese market, so it could settle in China. 3) Analysis from the theoretical level: Materialist dialectics tells us that primary and secondary contradictions can influence each other, communicate with each other, and transform into each other under certain conditions. If you only focus on one point and fail to compare with the rest, you will fall into a metaphysical fallacy. To sum up, we all agree that those who achieve great things should stick to small details!
Opposite: Please pay attention to the other debater! When we say restraint, we mean "strictness". This means that when we say that big things are done without sticking to small details, it does not mean that we do not want small details, but it means that we are not limited by small details and go beyond small details!
Positive: Please tell me how the other party, you friends, know what kind of details must be adhered to and what kind of details should not be adhered to. Isn’t it because of your informality that it cannot be ignored? Consequences?
Opponent: Please pay attention to the opposing debater. What we are discussing is whether to stick to trivial matters. We are not rigid. It does not mean that we do not care or pay attention, but that we will not be involved in trivial matters or involve too much energy. , of course we also strive for perfection, but if we want to achieve great things, we must grasp the main contradictions and the main directions of the contradictions, and use our energy to the fullest possible extent. We must know that when the main contradictions are resolved, the secondary contradictions will also be solved. . The opponent’s fellow debater is obviously quarreling with us and keeps confusing attention and rigidity. Doesn’t he already agree with our point of view? Indeed, subsections and details can be transformed to a certain extent, but they are different in the face of different major events. , can the opposing debater arbitrarily graft the influence of details onto subsections? Doesn’t that mean that details = sections? H and He can be converted into each other. When you are thirsty, drink helium dioxide and let me see. The opponent argued that the success stories of McDonald's and Wal-Mart were all because they did important things that mattered to the overall situation. These things are the key to success or failure. Are these so-called minutiae and trivial things that have nothing to do with the overall situation? From ancient times to the present, those who achieve great things must have something extraordinary, must have superhuman foresight and judgment, be able to sacrifice small things for big things, realize their own value to the greatest extent, and achieve great things. On the contrary, if one cannot distinguish priorities and is fettered by small details, it will definitely hinder the process of achieving great things, or even make a wrong move and lose the whole game. Therefore, those who can achieve great things must not stick to small details, and those who stick to small details will definitely not achieve great things.
Affirmative: The affirmative debater said something very puzzling before, "When the main contradiction is resolved, the secondary ones will also be solved." But is this really the case? We must know that while we concentrate our efforts to solve the main contradiction, we must also take all aspects into consideration to solve the secondary contradictions. The resolution of the secondary contradictions sometimes also has an important impact on the resolution of the main contradiction. However, the opposing debater confuses the resolution of primary and secondary contradictions and only focuses on one point but not the rest. It is really a metaphysical fallacy. By the way, let me ask my fellow debater, what is the difference between a small section and a major event? Perhaps to a high mountain, a basket of soil is nothing.
But who doesn’t know that “for the sake of nine people, only a small amount of success will be achieved”? History has repeatedly taught us with bloody facts: It is often the seemingly insignificant details that determine success or failure!
Opposition: It is indeed difficult to grasp the small sections, but this cannot deny the correctness of not sticking to the small sections. When the small sections are transformed into big sections, we must not only pay attention to it but also do our best as much as possible, but we must not be trivial. Bound by small things, the examples given by the opposing debater are all about paying attention to small things without affecting big things, but they are by no means bound by these small things and cannot extricate themselves. This is the true meaning of the word "bound". You have never been able to do so from beginning to end. Find evidence to support your argument. If those upright officials are constrained by their purity, and they dress in a clean and dignified manner, how can they have the heart to do things for the people? If we are strict with ourselves in small details, don't we serve big things? Then how can we stick to small details and hinder big things? Maybe the other party will look for people who are sticklers for details but still have some achievements, but it cannot be denied that this kind of stickiness in details has indeed had a serious impact on their success. If they don't suffer a complete failure and are covered with bruises, they have to be stubborn and high-spirited. Do those who sing about big things ignore small details? The other party's third debate has been emphasizing those "seemingly insignificant details." Does seeming insignificant mean that it has nothing to do with the overall situation? / If not, then the small details you are talking about are your assumptions about big ones. Well, then what's the point of your gushing?
Affirmative: I would like to ask the opponent’s fellow debater, is there any necessary connection between the person’s elegant demeanor and whether he is an upright official? Could it be that if a person pays attention to his appearance, he will not be successful because he is stuck in trivial matters? When a person goes out to negotiate on behalf of a company or even a country, if he does not pay attention to his dress etiquette, what kind of impression will he leave on the other party? A drop of water can reflect the brilliance of the sun. I don’t think anyone wants to negotiate with someone who can’t even dress themselves correctly! Ask the opposing debater to name a very successful person who has never been arrested once in his life. OK! I have read such a short story: There was a young man named Chen Fan in the Eastern Han Dynasty, who lived alone in a room and was very dirty. His father's friend Xue Qin criticized him and asked him why he didn't clean up to welcome the guests. He replied: "When a man lives his life, he should sweep the whole world and keep his whole house safe?" Xue Qin immediately retorted: "If you don't sweep one house, how can you sweep the whole world?"
If you think about it carefully, the reason why Chen Fan Not cleaning the house is nothing more than disdain. It is certainly valuable to have great ambitions and to "sweep the world", but it must be done by not sweeping the house as a manifestation of "abandoning the small ambitions of sparrows and admiring the swans to soar high". I dare not agree. Those who achieve great things must also stick to small details.
Everything always starts from the small to the big. As the saying goes, to make a big difference, you must follow certain steps and procedures. There is also a saying in the "Siqi" chapter of "The Book of Songs: Daya" that "the widow is punished, and the brothers are punished to control the family." This means that he should set an example for his wife first, and then spread it to his brothers, and then further manage the family well. One country. Just imagine, a person who is unwilling to clean the house, when he sets out to do a big thing, he will inevitably ignore its initial links and basic steps, because to him it is just cleaning the house. Therefore, this business is like a building without a good foundation. It is flashy and cannot withstand even a magnitude 3 or 4 earthquake. It is really "precarious", so sticking to small details is the basis for achieving great things.
This reminds me of the basic learning issues that many teachers once said. In the process of learning, we often focus on delving into some comprehensive and complex topics, but unknowingly give up on the in-depth understanding of basic knowledge. Now that things have happened, regret cannot restore the lost time, so we can only consolidate it from the beginning, but the impression is much lighter. I have been deeply affected by this kind of thinking, so my understanding of "sections" has become deeper and I feel more and more important.
"A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." "Opportunities only favor those who are prepared." These all show that without daily accumulation, even if the best fate befalls him, he will We can only watch helplessly as it passes by, what a pity that would be! So we must first learn to "stick to the details", so that when "big things happen", you will know what should be solved immediately , which things can be postponed or even given up.
Our beloved Premier Zhou can be called a representative who wants to sweep the world before sweeping a house. He has set the great goal of "study for the rise of China" since he was a child. In his teenage years, his academic performance was first-rate and his social activities were extensive. He ran a newspaper, wrote articles, and gave eloquent speeches. He had extraordinary eloquence and agility, which had a great influence on his future talents and strategies when he became prime minister. If he did not have the down-to-earth job of "sweeping floors", then when he faced a huge country with a population of 600 million, faced with complicated domestic and international situations, and faced with those sudden natural and man-made disasters, he would be able to be a country that manages everything day by day. Prime Minister? This shows that Premier Zhou's glorious revolutionary achievements of "sweeping the world" are inseparable from his early work of "sweeping houses".
"Standing on small details" and "making big things happen" are of the same origin. However, small details are also part of big things. How can "making big things happen" exclude "sticking to small details"?
I hope you will adopt it. !