We also hold this debate`~~~

Haha

The word "Internet" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of Chinese people in recent years, even raising glasses at the wine table* **Drink,

People call it "networking". In just a few years, the number of people using email and online chat in China has increased exponentially. However, does the Internet bring people closer or alienate them?

At the beginning of the debate, the University of Malaya team held high the banner of "the Internet brings people closer", and He Xiaowei opened the debate

Listing several reasons: the emergence of the Internet has reduced barriers around the world, Increase communication. For example, I have not

been to Macau, but I can get information about Macau through the Internet; people share information online and

promote mutual love and help among human beings. For example, last year people Assistance for floods in East China. However, the University of Macau team

also held a firm stance. Zhang Ying analyzed the debate from the theory of interpersonal relations: communication between people

is divided into emotions and information. Although the Internet makes people feel It is convenient and fast, but how can emotions and information be weighed heavily?

One shoulder carries the heavy burden - saying goodbye online, how can it be compared to "The water in the Peach Blossom Pond is a thousand feet deep, and it is not as affectionate as Wang Lun sent me

" Kindness; How can online greetings from lovers be more picturesque than the poem "On the willow branches above the moon, people meet after dusk"

Isn't there a famous saying - No one on the Internet knows whether you are a dog.

According to the previous fighting methods, the point of view is shown, and the following should be a mutual fight. This year's debate has a new setting:

"Free Man": It does not require rigorous thinking, but must be witty and humorous. It can be used twice in one and a half minutes.

You can challenge the other three debaters. Shi Lengjian. This time, both sides raised a question. On the other side, Wang Wei

Cheng asked: Will the shortening of time and space necessarily bring people closer together? Chen Ruihua, the advocate, asked: Some people are addicted to reading

Some people are addicted to fishing. Will reading and fishing alienate people? Although there was no confrontation, it set the stage for the next two-minute encounter.

Sure enough, after cross-examination and summary by both sides, the direct confrontation between the free men brought the climax of the game

. Chen Ruihua, the advocate, insists that Qingshan will not relax: The Internet provides people with opportunities and space for communication, so why do we have to say that the Internet makes people more alienated? Wang Weicheng, a free man on the opposite side, used the sword of "emotion" and "accused" the shortcomings of the Internet with great emotion: a professor at Columbia University

Addicted to the Internet, he has to - ——Wang stretched out his ten fingers as if hitting the keyboard——It seemed exaggerated and funny, but Wang said seriously that he had lost the ability to interact with others. Besides,

urban people need to communicate, even if their loved ones have to "go home often, even if they help mom wash the dishes and dad

rub his shoulders." Since you don't know whether the other person is a boy or a girl, good or bad, how can you "Don't ask who you are, please fall in love with me". Therefore, for those who are addicted to the Internet, it is better to say that,

"Get off the Internet when it's time to get off the Internet and have a good time." In the emotional part, Wang Weicheng sang while speaking.

The audience also responded with warm applause.

The free debate that followed was even more intense. The opposite question is, you and your lover know each other and are in love.

If you rely on the Internet to hug, be careful of getting an electric shock! The positive side responded, today I am playing in Beijing and I can't go home. Sending an email to my mother through the Internet can bring us closer to each other. If we have to meet each other,

it won't last a lifetime. All staying at home? Both sides come and go, each with their own offense and defense. The team members are nervous, and the audience is busy - the debaters are full of witty words, and it is a little late to applaud. At the beginning of the argumentation stage, Zhengfang used the Internet to enhance people's understanding and overcome communication barriers. Time and space are reduced, and people of different skin colors can communicate and express their views like "confidants in the sea".

The opposing side insists that proximity in time and space cannot represent closer psychological and ideological closeness, and discusses the opposing side's point of view by arguing that the virtuality, ambiguity, and uncertainty of the Internet lead to dishonesty between people.

During the attack and defense process, the affirmative stated that the Internet is just a tool and has no initiative to prove that it is people, not the Internet, who are "alienated". The other side pointed out that if you don’t even know your name or gender when making friends online, how can you be considered close? During the free debate and summary, the two sides even engaged in verbal exchanges and performed brilliantly. On the other hand, the Internet brings fast-food-style emotions, which makes it easy for people to mistake virtuality for reality, making people more indifferent to each other. The positive side used "knife" as an example to reduct fallacy, and ended his speech with sentences and examples full of humanistic care.

The positive side of "the Internet brings people closer" won the victory. After watching the game, Zhang Chaoyang commented

"This proposition is a comparative proposition, but both sides failed to solve the problem and establish the argument.

'Whether the Internet makes people closer or not? The analysis is carried out using the word "more" ("more alienated"), but emphasizes the proposition itself of "whether the Internet brings people closer or alienates them", but the debates on both sides are very

Wonderful. ”

As a netizen and the president of a well-known Internet company, Zhang Chaoyang believes:

The Internet has brought people closer. "It gives people the right to choose. You can choose the people and things you want to be close to

and the people and things you want to distance yourself from."

Zhang Chaoyang feels that this choice makes People have broken the boundaries in time and space, allowing your communication group to expand to the whole world, and time is not limited. But in the presence of this completely new means of communication, people are often confused when faced with so many choices. Various

choices fragment people’s time, leaving them no time to drink and chat with friends.

This is indeed a drawback of the Internet. But if you can arrange your time reasonably, the Internet can enhance people's understanding and bring them closer to each other. During the SARS period, obtaining the latest information as quickly as possible and communicating with family and friends immediately became one of the ways for people to eliminate panic. Many people use the Internet to learn about the epidemic, relieve their emotions, pass relevant and useful information to family and friends via email, and report to each other that they are safe. During the SARS period, the Internet brought people closer together, allowing people to maintain the same communication as before and even get closer

Let me read the information slowly~~~

Reference:/f?kz=65224455