On June 15, Didi announced that it had formally sued the performer of the "sexual assault video" and Xing Ai Live, a live broadcast platform involving pornography, in response to the fact that the online transmission was suspected that Didi driver sexually assaulted the live broadcast and was later confirmed by the police as a live broadcast of husband and wife pornography.

Didi said that it has submitted prosecution materials to the Beijing Internet Court, investigated the legal responsibilities of the live broadcast platform, live broadcast producers and performance participants, and resolutely used legal means to safeguard the reputation of Didi and Didi drivers.

Didi said that Che Motao and Gao Mouqi are not Didi drivers, but their behavior of attracting others to watch and make profits by seducing female passengers as a gimmick has had an extremely bad impact on the reputation of Didi and Didi drivers, so they chose to resort to legal means.

Extended data

Cause of the incident:

On June 1 1, Weibo user "Chocolate Cui Cui Killing" broke the news that in the early morning of June1,a suspected online car driver claimed to rape a female passenger with drugs and broadcast it live on a live broadcast platform.

On the afternoon of June 1 1, it was revealed that the netizen @ "Chocolate Trisha" issued a statement on "Dripping Driver's Live Sexual Assault", saying that it was not a party. At first, I thought the suspect was a Didi driver. I'm sorry for inadvertently guiding the public opinion against Didi.

On the evening of June 12, @ Pingan Zhengzhou announced the results of the survey: a young couple (male 22 years old, female 2 1 year old) publicly performed pornographic performances to attract others to watch through an illegal live broadcast platform APP, taking the online car driver as a gimmick.

After the results of the survey were announced, Didi Travel Official Micro forwarded it for the first time and said: "After our comparison and verification, Che Motao and Gao Mouqi are not Didi drivers."

On June 13, Weibo denied the rumor and issued a document saying that according to the relevant provisions of the complaint operation rules of Weibo, killing the account @ Chocolate Cui Cui has constituted "publishing false information", and now he is punished for closing his account.

Beijing Daily Client-Didi sued the performers of "Sexual Assault Video" and the live broadcast platform related to pornography