Our Chinese textbook says that "modern society is a society full of competition, but it is also a society that needs cooperation more. As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success." Competition and cooperation are two forces that constitute the survival and development of life and society. There is competition and cooperation in social life.
"Three heads are better than Zhuge Liang". Many people are wise. As long as you are good at cooperation and give full play to the strength of cooperation and the whole, you can find a way to succeed. Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird. There is a popular Japanese saying: One China can beat one Japanese, but three China people can't beat three Japanese. Although this is to say that China people have the ability of individual competition and success, they are not good at collective cooperation. Take the national men's volleyball team, men's basketball team and men's soccer team for example: in terms of height, we are much higher than Japanese and Korean players; In terms of training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key competitions? One of the important reasons is that they have played a cooperative spirit, at least better than us. It can be seen that no matter what you do, people who are good at cooperation can succeed with the concerted efforts of both sides.
However, there are many problems in competition, which easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and make people more selfish and narrow-minded. It also makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss, and even have serious psychological disorders. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. thank you
Second, the stage of attack and debate:
The second debate in the positive side says to everyone: Judges, opponents and friends: Hello everyone!
Dr. Sun Yat-sen said: "Species take competition as the principle, and human beings take cooperation as the principle. If human beings follow this principle, they will prosper, but if they don't, they will die.". It can be seen how important cooperation is.
There is a popular saying in the north and south of the Yangtze River: People paddle and sail big boats. You won't forget the catastrophic flood in 1998! Facts have proved that the victory of this special campaign requires the concerted efforts of all the officers and men fighting floods and the people of all ethnic groups throughout the country, so as to finally build a great wall against floods on the backbone of our nation.
let's not forget when SARS was raging in 23. It was with the concerted efforts of leaders at all levels from the central and local levels and people from all walks of life that we won the final victory. Therefore, all this proves that "cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition".
Due to competition and indifference, you guard against me and I guard against you. On the surface, they are kind, but in the bottom of their hearts, there are many phenomena. The other debater, isn't this all caused by "competition"?
Pro 3 says to everyone: Hello, Chairman, judges and other debaters!
The first argument of the opposing side mentioned that today's debate is a kind of competition, and the second argument of the opposing side also mentioned that competition causes unhealthy psychology. It is completely wrong for the other debater to regard competition as the apple of his eye and a panacea. Can it be said that only competition can promote the development of social civilization? Excuse me, "it's none of your business, so hang it high" and "only take it, not give it"; Only emphasize individual competition, and do not care about the development and future of the country. " Where did the civilization develop? Therefore, your view that competition is beneficial to the development of civilization is nonsense.
During the Three Kingdoms period, Sun Quan and Liu Bei joined forces to fight against Cao Cao, which laid a solid foundation for the Three Kingdoms. Isn't the birth of Das Kapital the crystallization of the cooperation between Marx and Engels?
Everyone knows Michael Jordan of Chicago Bulls. Many people may be crazy about him. Jordan's success is inseparable from the cooperation and assistance of his teammates. Looking back on the past and looking to the future, we firmly believe that "cooperation can make civilization progress"!
Zheng Fang 4 argues to everyone: Judges and friends!
Just now, the opponent's first debate repeatedly emphasized the importance of competition, but we should ask the other debater to realize clearly that there is a lot of cooperation in the process of competition itself, and competition is to promote better cooperation, and there are still many problems in competition, such as competition makes people narrow and selfish, which easily leads to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and so on.
The fierce competition in reality makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss, and even have serious psychological disorders. How can these show that competition promotes civilization and progress? Only cooperation can promote the progress of civilization.
First of all, cooperation can promote people's better survival. The society is becoming more and more complicated. Only by joining hands and cooperating with each other can we tide over the difficulties.
Secondly, cooperation trains talents who are more suitable for the development of modern society than competition. Cultivate good psychological morality such as caring for others, unity and friendship.
Third, cooperation is more conducive to promoting the development of science than competition. Isn't the successful development of China's "Shenzhou 5" spacecraft the result of the cooperation of many researchers?
fourth, cooperation can promote social stability more than competition. The success in fighting "floods", "SARS" and "bird flu" is the best example.
let's join hands and work together to create a more civilized future!
Grasping cooperation is the basis of competition, and the ultimate goal of competition is to achieve better cooperation.
Any competition is based on cooperation. Without cooperation, where does the competitiveness come from? You can directly ask your opponent's debater if they are the best in their department's internal competition for this debate. If the answer is yes, you can compliment them first, and then ask him if they are so strong today because of the cooperation of colleagues in their department and several debaters. I don't believe he dares to say no. You can thank him for supporting your point of view. Cooperation is the basis of competition. The foundation of everything is the most important thing. Tall buildings rise from the ground without foundation. So cooperation is higher than competition. If you are asking whether they are competing in the department, and he says that they are not competing, but they signed up by themselves, then you ask whether they studied together before the competition, and whether they are cooperating and debating with us now. You said that in this process, you didn't compete, but you cooperated, which fully proved that cooperation is higher than competition! ! !
first, cooperation is an inevitable requirement for the progress of human society. Man is an animal of society, and social cooperation is the "humanity" to promote social progress, while the competition with mutual containment and consumption as the goal of winning is the expression of man's "animal nature". We have repeatedly stressed that the basic principle of "survival of the fittest by natural selection" is the concept of biology. People are not only people in nature! The sociality of human beings fundamentally determines that if people want to survive and develop on this planet, they must follow the principle of mutual cooperation and development, and only in this way can cooperation in the sense of human development be the most fundamental force to promote social progress. Unity is strength! From a historical perspective, from a historical perspective, it is cooperation that makes human beings bid farewell to the primitive society. On the contrary, it is the competition for land, population and living space that makes the tragedies of bloodshed and slaughter staged again and again; It is the sharing of social resources and the division of labor and cooperation that make the capitalist society create countless wealth of value, and it is the yearning for world hegemony and the mutual containment and boring competition that make the human beings who pursue peace bear the social retrogression of two world wars and the Cold War! The other students study history and study history. I think they don't know these truths. Competition, and it must be benign and reasonable competition based on social welfare, plays only a role in promoting the improvement of efficiency and accelerating the speed of social progress to a certain extent. It is difficult for a clever woman to cook without rice. In the fundamental sense, cooperation is still "skin does not exist", and the superficial competition is "how can the hair be attached?"
second, cooperation is also an inevitable trend of social progress. We believe that from the perspective of the definition of cooperation, an important symbol of social progress is the increasingly detailed division of labor, the increasing enjoyment of social resources and the increasing improvement of social welfare. The existence of cooperation is the requirement and result of the refinement of social division of labor, and it is also an important basis for promoting the further rationalization of social division of labor. Competition, especially vicious and extreme competition without cooperation as the premise, is most likely to lead to the winner being king, the law of the jungle, annexation, monopoly, centralized and dominant. This is undoubtedly contrary to the requirements of economic, political and spiritual civilization advocated by our society today, the globalization of international economic and trade and the multi-level development trend of the international community. The wheel of history is rolling forward, and the other debater must know better than we do what will be the result of moving against the historical development trend.
thirdly, competition will inevitably bring about a certain degree of mutual containment and consumption within the scope, resulting in the crowding and waste of limited resources. And cooperation can avoid similar problems to the greatest extent. A few years ago, the high-volume and low-quality redundant construction in various parts of the country was not caused by the fact that there was no coordinated cooperation mechanism between regions, but only the pursuit of formalistic face-saving projects at the expense of local competition. Competition is a double-edged sword. Without the powerful hand of cooperation, it is very likely that you will be injured in the end! Haven't we suffered enough from low-level internal competition, consumption, disunity and non-cooperation? In the debate just now, we repeatedly asked the other debater how to solve and improve the problems of mutual containment and consumption brought by competition and the crowding and waste of social resources, but the other debater just did not give a positive answer.
fourthly, with regard to the theory of "survival of the fittest" brought by competition, so as to optimize the rational allocation of social resources, we believe that this is indeed an advantage of competition, but this advantage only applies to nature. What we are discussing here today is social progress, which belongs to the category of sociology, anthropology and history. The laws of nature for species evolution, screening and even ruthless elimination are not fully applicable to human society. For some endangered and precious species, such as giant pandas, which have been difficult to reproduce and continue under the natural conditions of modern society, we still can't let them "survive and die", let alone people in the process of social development? According to the logic that the opposing side argues for friends as the law of "survival of the fittest" in the progress of human society, should we "abolish" the nationality of those who cannot occupy certain social resources or will be ruthlessly eliminated by society because of their limited personal ability? According to this theory of social progress competition, the contribution of 8 million farmers in China, who live at the bottom of the real society and lack competitiveness, to social progress has not been wiped out? Isn't it a long time to solve the problem of farmers in China? The respect of civil rights and the establishment and perfection of social democracy and legal system have not become a blank check that cannot be cashed? There are also social vulnerable groups that are now facing major survival challenges and even crises. Will they also become victims of the so-called "competition-driven theory" of the other side? Is it the so-called promotion of social progress that one group is eliminated at the expense of another group in exchange for the "superiority" of another group? Can society really make progress in this tragic competition that is similar to slaughter? What is the warmth of such a progressive and developed society? Where is the sensibility? Where is the right to live and the equality of life? If this "competition-driven theory" of survival of the fittest is unfortunately established, then I would rather the society not progress and not develop!
Finally, I want to say that competition not only promotes social development and progress, but also obliterates some of the most essential things of human survival and development. When we do whatever it takes to promote social progress in order to compete, have we ever thought about how lonely we will be when we won the competition completely and stopped competing and could not cooperate at the same time? Marx tells us that * * * capitalism is the highest level of human social progress, and * * * capitalism is a resurrection of ancient clans in a progressive society of freedom, equality and fraternity, and it is also a high-level resurrection. As "Li Yun Da Tong Pian" said: The world is for the public, and it is for the great harmony.
A debate:
The network is a virtual space. Its convenience, quickness, flexibility and other advantages have expanded our knowledge and given us a space to roam. Its appearance has changed our traditional way of thinking and given us great help in our lives, which is undeniable.
However, the Internet brings more
1. Internet addiction brings psychological and physical diseases
2. It reduces the academic performance of students
3. It causes social problems.
therefore, we think that the disadvantages of the internet outweigh the advantages.
Debate:
(Yes, the network is necessary, practical and realistic. However, the network also has all kinds of black shadows. Give you an example of online games! Addiction to online games is harmful to physical and mental health. A college student in a university in Chengdu has such a schedule: get up at 13: and have lunch; 14: , go to the Internet cafe to play online games; At 17: , order takeout at the Internet cafe for dinner; I practiced all night and went back to the dormitory at 9: the next morning to rest ... The college student spent almost all his spare time playing games and began to refuse to attend class reunion and activities. About two months later, he found that his thinking couldn't keep up with the rhythm of his classmates. All he thought about was what happened in the game. When he met something, he would first consider it with the rules in the game. He began to feel unaccustomed to real life and fell into deep anxiety. What's more, in order not to be searched by parents for a mere 5 thousand yuan to play online games, they poisoned their parents with tetramine. This is what Hu Ange, a young man from Shehong, Sichuan, did.
Three arguments:
(Yes, the network is necessary, practical and realistic. ) Show you another set of data. At present, many young people in China, like this college student, have been addicted to online games for a long time, and found that they have some physical and mental problems. According to statistics, at present, the number of online game players in China has reached 7 million to 1 million, and a considerable number of them are young people around the age of 2. Social problems caused by online game addiction have emerged. In February of this year, a 16-year-old boy in Hubei was addicted to online games, and he chopped his mother with a knife in the middle of the night and snatched 8, yuan. In March, a 14-year-old boy from Yuanjiang, Hunan Province, fell from the fourth floor and died because of hallucinations caused by online games. The harm of online games to teenagers' physical and mental health has attracted the attention of psychologists and sociologists. Finally, I remind my opponent not to turn a deaf ear to a large number of facts.
Four arguments:
Although the Internet has such and such benefits, the disadvantages caused by surfing the Internet are also chilling.
1. Causing mental decadence
2. Affecting physical and mental health
3. Affecting interpersonal communication
4. Causing economic burden
5. Even going to the road of breaking the law and committing crimes
6. Affecting family and social stability
Therefore, in our opinion, the network does more harm than good.
Free debate:
The network is a virtual space. Its convenience, quickness, flexibility and other advantages have expanded our knowledge and given us space to travel. Its appearance has changed our traditional way of thinking and given us great help in our life. We can browse many online books while sitting at home, and we can receive letters from Wan Li within a few minutes, and we can get all aspects in the shortest time. This we.