Hi, I personally think that the affirmative side of this argument is really at a disadvantage...

Just the word "extensive" is enough. Judging from the question you asked, according to the game terminology, you are completely in a "hard" state of "defenseless", haha

It seems that you have been pushed to the edge of the cliff and have no foothold at all.

I'll give it a try and see if I can get you a "last-ditch" position on the edge of the cliff

============ ==

First of all

What is the opposite of "extensive"? Is it "narrow"?

The other party is opposed to the "extensive" socialization of middle school students. Should middle school students socialize "narrowly"?

So, please tell us what kind of person can meet your standards of "allowing middle school students to associate with them"?

(The other party probably won’t answer directly here, because it is really difficult to determine this “standard”. Moreover, the audience and judges will not agree if the scope is too rigidly limited; if the scope is set slightly larger, we will You can say "Isn't such a large scope considered broad?")

(So, here, we first find an excuse for "the other party avoids the question and cannot answer directly", and first restores the momentum. A little decline)

===========

Secondly

What is "extensive"? (Here you must check books like "Cihai", "Chinese Dictionary", and Chinese Encyclopedia to find a definition suitable for us)

(In a general sense, "extensive" means Interpreted as meaning something like "wide range")

From the definition, everyone can understand that "extensive" refers to a range, not a degree.

What does this mean? That is to say, we agree that "middle school students can socialize extensively", which means "middle school students can communicate with all kinds of people", rather than "middle school students should socialize with all groups of people" - we can select a few from the "wide" range, and It is not necessary to socialize with "all" people, so many people

For example, government reports often mention: "We need to extensively solicit opinions from the masses." So, by soliciting opinions extensively, does it mean asking everyone in every field? Or should we solicit representative opinions selectively?

If it’s the former, I’m afraid the government won’t have to carry out any work. It will be too busy asking people everywhere every day.

It can be seen that the so-called "extensive" refers to making reasonable choices in a large range, rather than trying to deal with everyone in a large range

Therefore, there is no "time" at all. limited energy".

If the other party thinks that "middle school students have limited time and energy...it will inevitably affect their regular careers," then I would like to ask, whose time and energy are unlimited? Whose real job is to "socialize" everywhere? A social butterfly?

(Although the phrase "social butterfly" is a bit cruel, I think it must still be mentioned to create an effect in the audience and suppress the opponent's momentum)

So, we don't It should be artificially limited, and middle school students are only allowed to interact within a small area...

============

Third

What is "social"?

"Social interaction" refers to normal communication activities in society.

Is meeting and saying hello considered normal social interaction?

The other party thinks that when others say hello to us in our lives, should we also smile in return?

Or should we only respond to the greetings of a small number of people and ignore others? – Because we shouldn’t socialize “extensively”?

Don’t think that very solemn, time-consuming and labor-intensive formal activities are called “socializing”. Normal interactions between people are what we advocate as “socializing”

(put “ "Social interaction", try to rely on "normal interaction", in this way, our foothold will be more stable)

Prohibit students from extensive social interaction, and encourage middle school students to selectively interact with only certain types of people. Why do I feel that I am advocating the kind of arrogance that "disdains the company of inferior people"? !

============

Fourth

"Middle school student", the so-called middle school student, is not one or two people, but one It is a very broad group. We are middle school students. There are also middle school students who live in remote mountainous areas. There are also middle school students studying abroad. There are also middle school students who are blind, deaf-mute, and disabled. Please tell me how to limit it. These living environments are completely different and have different psychological and physiological conditions. Should middle school students of all kinds only associate with a certain type or types of people?

Perhaps, for the children with simple natures in the mountains, they want to be "extensive", which is more than they can ask for!

We actually have to use the concept of modern cities to restrict them? Teach them "Don't Talk to Strangers"? !

============

============

As for other "identifications" With limited abilities, it is easy to be led astray by others." "Making full use of the advantageous resources they possess...is the golden period for learning knowledge and cultivating one's own qualities."

These are relatively easy to deal with,

Is it because of limited discernment that we have to protect it like flowers in a greenhouse? When you get out of campus, will you, as Mr. Lu Xun said, "face the bleak world head-on"? !

Is it because it is the "golden period for cultivating one's own quality" that we should only cultivate the ability to read and take exams, and only need to learn to face unified and dead textbooks, but we should not learn to face all kinds of Like, a living person?

========================== To summarize================ =

In this debate, the affirmative is indeed at a disadvantage

Some aspects of the above discussion are indeed a bit "strong words", such as either "broad" or "narrow"

< p>However, under such very unfavorable conditions of inherent disadvantage, if we continue to fight head-on with a dignified formation, I think it is a bit too "Song Xianggong"...

So, there must be a "last-ditch fight" To be prepared, you must have the attack method of "rushing into the enemy's position and disrupting its position" - if you can make the opponent always be attacked in unexpected places, even if you may not be able to break through its position, but make them tired of defense and unable to attack, Then our disadvantages can be minimized

Even if the other party points out that it is either "extensive" or "narrow", we have to say that the other party finally admits that we should not socialize "extensively" but socialize "extensively" Socialize “relatively extensively, relatively extensively”? ! Force the opponent with momentum.

Although we are at a disadvantage, we will never give up easily

What is written above may not be enough for us to win the game, but it may be able to win the "Don't give up, don't give up" respect and recognition