so how to deal with the relationship between "Wen" and "Tao"? The concept of "rooted in righteousness, developed as literary words" in ancient literature originated from "Taoism" (righteousness), but it was integrated with literature. The outstanding points of his view are as follows:
First, the exploration of the external realistic relationship between literature and Taoism has taken a big step forward to the exploration of the internal relationship between works such as reason, style and qi. In particular, it emphasizes the sensation of social events and the need to quickly enter the creative process under the impetus of this emotion, so that one's spirit can be completely liberated in "speaking with enthusiasm" and produce strong radiation, thus constantly strengthening the author's positive emotions in his creation.
Secondly, we should use this view of literature and Taoism to break the boundary between ancient Chinese and contemporary Chinese, and transform contemporary Chinese with ancient Chinese, taking contemporary Chinese as ancient Chinese. By the late Ming Dynasty, the imperial examination system of stereotyped writing for selecting scholars had violated the intention of "inventing the meaning of saints", and scholars were named for profit and attached importance to literature and law. In view of this shortcoming, he didn't take the current prose as inferiority, combined the strengths of ancient prose and current prose, and reformed the current prose, striving to achieve "the root is extremely reasonable, and it is a literary word", and both. "To be a friend is a hundred years old, and those who have ambitions in Korea and Europe are also in ancient Chinese, but they don't despise modern Chinese for lack of learning. It can be seen that the "Wen" of "Ming Dow" is not different from the "ancient prose" specifically referred to by ancient writers, but refers to the "Wen" in general.
Thirdly, using this view of literature and Taoism combined with literary practice to evaluate ancient literary writers, points out their gains and losses, and draws a more pertinent conclusion. Thus, on the one hand, concurrent composition should be invented based on classics, on the other hand, it should be free to speak without overstepping the law.