The reason why I dare to say this is mainly because I was offended by the interviewer when I was applying for a job, and I have seen the interviewer scolded by the job seeker for deceiving the job seeker. Of course, not all interviewers will be so malicious and incompetent, but it is undeniable that some interviewers do lack their due professionalism.
The interviewer's lack of professional quality leads to positioning errors. Originally, the interviewer and the job seeker have equal status, but many times the interviewer will be full of superiority. This so-called sense of superiority often stimulates job seekers. What's more, some interviewers will put themselves in the position of judges. For this, a netizen made an incisive summary. You might as well have a look:
The interviewer is only a position, but most interviewees think they are case handlers, and they cross-examine job seekers as criminals. Their words hurt their self-esteem and privacy. They always ask job seekers to provide their former colleagues' phone numbers and leak them to their new units. Former colleagues are very angry! Most interviewers don't reflect on this abnormal behavior, but they try every time! ?
2.0 The Shenzhen interviewer was killed or had nothing to do with the job seeker's job search. It is more likely that the Shenzhen interviewer was killed in an office building in Longhua District, Shenzhen. At that time, both the interviewer and the job seeker were in the company model room, and no third party was on the scene. At that time, the employees of the company saw the job seekers running out of the model room, and then the interviewer also ran out. The interviewer was covered in blood, lying on the ground without running a few steps, and blood splashed everywhere.
Seeing this, the interviewer's colleagues quickly dialed 120 and 1 10. Unfortunately, when 120 arrived, the interviewer had already bled to death. This matter is very doubtful. Why do job seekers bring knives when interviewing? Job seekers deliberately bring knives during the interview, and it is even more deliberate. In reality, no one will deliberately bring a knife to apply for a job, right?
The information disclosed by the insider confirms the suspicion of intentional homicide to some extent. According to an insider, the interviewer's company is an operating company, and its main business is to charge high fees by helping people open online stores. The interviewer of this murder case is actually a client. He found that the online shop failed to meet expectations and could not get a refund, so he came to the company disguised as a candidate, which eventually led to this tragedy.
The above situation, although the insider said vividly, is only the insider's one-sided statement and has not been officially confirmed. At present, the perpetrators have surrendered themselves, and the truth of the incident should come out soon. Once things are as the insider said, then this event, the interviewer's career (post), is quite innocent and lost for no reason.
3.0 Interviewer incident I experienced: As a job seeker, I was deeply offended; As a bystander, the interviewer will achieve his goal by hurting job seekers. The position of the interviewer mentioned above may be quite innocent, but in reality some interviewers really deserve to be killed. At least, I think I should refuse to interview my interviewer. Mind you, I'm talking about being killed, not being killed. In any case, killing people should not be done. I am firmly opposed to job seekers taking excessive actions to kill the interviewer because they are offended by the interviewer.
After graduating from college, I chose to start a business. Two years later, I lost everything and had to go out to work. The first company interviewed was a medium-sized manufacturing enterprise. The interviewer is a middle-aged woman. At first, everyone got along well and talked well. But slowly, she came to work, saying that I didn't go to work two years after graduation, was it because I couldn't find a job at home, that my three degrees were nothing, that it was normal for me to find a job and that I was short?
Later, I never came back. At that time, I was not angry with her, so I took my resume and turned away. Later, I joined the current company and worked as an assistant in the production department. At that time, there were so many orders and there were not enough people. The boss gave the HR manager a dead order and had to recruit people. The personnel manager found a booth in the talent market to recruit people, so I went to help.
At that time, the daily wage of workers was about 150, and we also provided this wage, but the company was in a remote suburb and no one was in charge. The HR manager is in a hurry and directly drives the salary to 200 or even 250. Shortly thereafter, more than 20 interested candidates gathered together. The personnel manager found a minibus and took them all to the company. However, at this time, the personnel manager went back on his word and only talked to them about the salary of 150. These people don't want to, one of them flew into a rage, directly hit the table and then lift the table, pointing to the human resources manager for a while before leaving.
These are the only interviewers I have ever experienced. So-called? A glimpse of the whole leopard? In reality, some interviewers are really bad and often do things that offend job seekers. Maybe the company has KPI assessment, but it is really unnecessary to do so. We can find a better way to achieve our goal. Hurting job seekers is actually not good for the interviewer.