I don't look at constellations when I make friends, because I think astrology is actually pseudoscience. There are only two theories that the constellation is reasonable. One kind thinks that the current constellation is just a kind of entertainment, so it is good for everyone to be happy. The other one is very high-end I think that the constellations flying all over the sky on the Internet are not real constellations. Everyone thinks that constellations are pseudoscience, because the overwhelming false constellations leave a bad impression on people, so no one knows the real astrology.

First of all, the so-called horoscopes on the Internet are basically under the guise of ancient astrology, and people who write horoscopes also sign the names of "astrologers". Every month's psychological prediction will also give you a long list of seemingly reasonable "objective facts" to infer the fortune of different constellations. In this whole process, it is more or less implied that the constellation itself is obtained through strict reasoning of objective facts, thus gaining the trust of constellation supporters. But the fact is that most of these articles are made up at random.

Of course, I never think that people should be forced to interfere with other people's beliefs, but constellations are really misleading. For example, when it comes to Virgo, everyone laughs. No matter what kind of faith it is, when it tries to forcibly label others, I think it is unreasonable and unkind.

Making friends is not a constellation, not the influence of pseudoscience, but sincere communication.

This is my view of the constellation, promoting my own science, but lacking the rigor and inference of psychological data processing, I just try to make more people believe it under the guise of science.