since "bi" is a comparison, you must propose a comparison method and a standard. Personally, I think it is better to compare in quantity. After all, most people have more friends of the same sex than friends of the opposite sex. It is impossible to demonstrate the whole case, so you don't need to find a case material, just take you, me and him around you as the most convincing example.
How can a "friend" be considered a friend? The basis of making friends is nothing more than getting to know each other, appreciate each other. At this point, the generation gap between men and women is your weapon. It is hard for people who don't know each other to imagine becoming good friends. There is a nature between men and women. They are attracted to each other and are willing to contact, but is that a friend? At this point, you should take the line of friends in a narrow sense. Either two people have spoken or they are friends. You must help each other and have a heart-to-heart relationship to be friends.
above, I'm just digressing the topic, the meaning is to let you know where you want to grasp, and don't grasp everything, as long as what the other party says will be denied and you will lose. Make sure that what they say is no longer on the point, and if it is not, you will admit that he is right, and then say that it is beside the point, so don't get entangled in small issues. You are in the affirmative, and the affirmative view is the view that most people think is right. Therefore, you should play a good defensive game, because the opposing side must exploit loopholes, change concepts, and pull the East and West. Therefore, it is your task to deduct the topic and then deduct the topic.
I'm talking about some debating skills, because arguing is different from reasoning. You can't convince the other side, but you can only overwhelm the other side in the scene. And you can't win with reason, so skill is very important.
1, digression, as I said before, if the opponents want to win you, they must take you far away, so there is no doubt that most of the words of the opponents will have nothing to do with the debate, because they will not really compete with you. So most of the time, you just say, "You're beside the point". It should be repeatedly stressed that the other party will not change after he has prepared an opinion, so even if you say that he is off topic, they will still go around this off topic. No matter how you go around, you can't go with them and lose if you go. Don't think that you are careless when you are in the affirmative, because it will be miserable if there is a loophole for the opposition to catch. Therefore, the non-professional debate team will have a greater chance of winning.
2, for example, I don't want you to demonstrate this example, because you have examples and others have them. Look for examples that few people know, such as the theme of what sports, the core idea of what meetings, and then ask the other party if they know this "theme", "thought" and so on. They will definitely not know, and if they don't know, they will just listen to you. Moreover, their "ignorance" will affect their psychology, and they will feel humiliated. Momentum, understand?
3. Speed of speech. You may see people in other debates. Like machine guns, they all speak very fast. You have this ability. It's imposing. No, don't speak too fast. If you get stuck or break the article, you might as well speak slowly.
Finally, I wish you success.