there are two specific ways to play.
one is to apply for a refund on the grounds of seller's false delivery/empty package after receiving the principal. It is not limited to Taobao, but shopping platforms such as JD and PDD have strict penalties for false delivery and false transactions. Playing with a refund is to take advantage of the seller's fear of being targeted and punished. This kind of refund is usually done by swiping the bill in various return apps. Because TB stipulates that it takes 11 days from delivery to automatic confirmation of receipt (JD and PDD are longer, as many as 14-21 days), players usually do a lot of tasks in two weeks, until one or two days before automatic confirmation of receipt, and apply for a refund in batches.
the second is the so-called professional counterfeiting, which means buying real goods, pointing out that the seller sells fake goods or imitations after receiving the goods, and using the seller's advertising words to publicize the flaws or Want Want communication records to extort money, with only refund and no return; Recently, there is another way to apply for no reason to return the goods within 7 days after receiving them, but actually did not return them. Instead, they bought false logistics information through the empty package network (this waybill can be found in logistics official website, but it is all false logistics, and there is no actual delivery, so it automatically shows the sign-in, and the actual sign-in person has no chance to refuse), so as to realize the purpose of only refunding.
relatively speaking, the first category is more likely to make short-term profits and is close to zero risk. If the method is appropriate and the thinking is clear, it is not a problem to make a profit of 811,111-811,111 yuan in half a year, because the mainstream shopping platforms obviously have zero tolerance for billing and false delivery. For example, TB clearly stipulates that if a false transaction is verified, it will only be refunded. Moreover, when there is a dispute between buyers and sellers, the platform basically tends to buyers when it intervenes.
The foreseeable risk for refund players is that the shopping account is blocked/restricted. TB has the functions of regular honey and cloud tag, which can be used by sellers to complain and report malicious buyers. The former makes a false transaction and gets a refund after receiving the principal, and the latter makes too many complaints about regular honey. After receiving the goods, the shopping account can no longer be used. But as a professional player, obviously there will be more than one operable account under the name. Another kind of risk is legal proceedings. According to the existing legal provisions, the behavior of refunding the principal after a false transaction cannot be defined as fraud or theft, but the real seller will sue the buyer for returning the improper benefit on the grounds of unjust enrichment. Players may face the risk of litigation.