"Entrepreneurship" and "innovation" have never been possible for most people. Confusing these two concepts with "the whole people" is neither in tune nor possible.
From other countries in the world to China, the success rate of starting a business has always been very low, and most people are not suitable for starting a business, especially for managing large and medium-sized enterprises.
Let "most people" start their own businesses, and simply drive the ducks to the shelves, no matter whether they fall off or not. Perhaps from a macro point of view, this policy can transform some entrepreneurial losers into middle and low-level managers, but for individuals, most of the losses and pains caused by entrepreneurship are lost because of trivial matters.
Of course, in terms of entrepreneurship, our country has indeed made some efforts, such as lowering the threshold for the establishment of companies, simplifying the approval process, promoting loans for small and micro enterprises, and inclining policy planning industrial bases. These policies and measures undoubtedly have a certain effect on economic development, but I hope these policies can be targeted, instead of dragging in many "people" who lack entrepreneurial talent and experience.
Especially for college students, people at this stage not only lack entrepreneurial talents, but also have problems with basic work skills. Therefore, for this collective, we should pay attention to cultivating social experience, operate these startups as a regional simulation model, avoid facing the cruel social competition directly, do a good job of backup buffer measures, and don't expect children to make some earth-shattering achievements in a short time. Don't expect most children to be the boss as soon as they get started More students should start from employees, start from a certain work link, and then gradually be promoted to bosses in this mode to prepare for future social experiences.
Let's take a look at "innovation".
This cliche has worn away people's ears, but the phenomenon of innovation is still bleak, and the cottage industry has sprung up everywhere. ?
I think the main reason is this: Why do many startups lack entrepreneurial spirit and product awareness?
Innovation can not bring benefits, but also suffer losses, and even the process of accountability is cumbersome and expensive, and fools will innovate!
In the field of literature and art, literary, artistic and musical works automatically enjoy copyright as soon as they are published, including the words I wrote here. Without any formalities, you can go to the court to seek justice in a proper way as long as you have proof of writing time. But when it comes to inventions and innovations, you need to be protected and pay patent fees! Even if you lose, you have to sue for compensation! Even if you lose other lawsuits, the compensation is insolvent!