Federer played a rare high-level grass in recent years, and also evolved offensive techniques and changeable routines. Many wonderful landings and incredible returns were mostly played by Federer. It is hard to imagine that Federer, who is about to turn 38, can have such a wonderful performance and an almost impeccable return.
But Federer still lost. Where did you lose? Lose in the belief of winning and the adjustment of mentality at critical times. This game is very similar to the epic showdown in which Federer defeated Roddick in 2009. In that game, Roddick also played a rare good state and competitive level, but in the end he fell short. Why? It is also psychological fluctuation that caused the final defeat, and it is a mentality of wanting to win and being afraid of losing. The subtle changes in the handling of the key ball are reflected in the inability to grasp the immediate opportunities.
Belief in winning, fear of losing and winning are two completely different psychological manifestations. If you want to win and are afraid of losing, you often feel that you have worked so hard. When the opportunity comes, you must seize it and make no mistakes. The more the result is like this, the more irreparable mistakes will be made. The belief of victory is to keep calm no matter how backward, how embarrassing and picky, and firmly believe that there will be a turn for the better and that you can win this point.
This subtle mentality difference is finally reflected in Federer's serve on the court to win the game. Obviously, two ACE balls brought the score to 40: 15, and one more serve could solve the battle, but I still couldn't find the feeling of winning and couldn't fight.
So in the final analysis, it was Federer's own initiative that ruined a good set of goals.
In contrast, Djokovic, in fact, today his level is not beyond the level of play, but the embodiment of the normal level. But he can firmly grasp his own advantages, drag Federer to death, bring Federer into his own rhythm and slowly grind until Federer makes more and more mistakes and dares not start on the key ball. When he dares to do so, he often makes mistakes because of too much output in the early stage. Think about how Ding Junhui was killed by Selby several times in the Snooker World Championships, and you will know what is going on.
Deyue's success lies in building strong self-confidence and having a big heart. Think of Germany and Vietnam, which grew up from a broken country and constantly tempered their ability to cope with complex situations in adversity. Eventually nirvana was reborn. You may not like him, but you can't ignore his achievements.
Of course, Federer can stand at the center and commanding heights of the world tennis stage at the age of 38. No matter today's game, it is the best embodiment of his ability and talent. It is also the most powerful proof of his tennis career in his life and the promotion of tennis career. There is no doubt that he is the best.
Djokovic is also a very successful model. Although many seniors and fans don't regard him as the spokesman of tennis, no one can ignore his existence as another goat. In the final, the audience almost overwhelmingly supported Federer, so you can imagine how much pressure Djokovic had. But from beginning to end, he is a very mature performance, no swearing when he was young, no nonsense antics, only a calm defense. His calm mind is beyond his actual age.
So they are equally great. In this game, we saw the strongest grass attack and the strongest defensive counterattack in history.
It is true that the epic duel is over. There will always be happy people and sad people. But what brings to the world is that those classic interpretations that will remain immortal in history will shine in the long river of history. When two great rivals retire in the near future, they will cherish each other's common achievements.
You know, what kind of game is this!
Federer is ahead of Deyo in almost all technical statistics-except for unforced mistakes (which are also directly related to their different game styles), and even more 14 points in the total score. Facing Deyo, the first receiver in history, Niu Lao didn't send his first break point on the tee until the end of the fourth set, which has reached the limit.
As a fan of Niu Lao, this game really went from resignation (losing in the first set, remembering the experience of facing Deyo several times in the past), to igniting a little hope (winning in the second set soon), to resignation (kneeling down in the third set), and then to feeling that it was earned (successfully winning the fourth set and entering the long-term finals). Then in the deciding set, from accepting fate (the first one was broken), to feeling earned (broken back), to being ecstatic, and then only one step away from victory, the embarrassing stories of the two champions happened.
I will never forget this game, but it may be the greatest game in tennis history. In my opinion, this game has surpassed Wimbledon in 2008 and the 0 12 Australian Open final.
========================================
Technically speaking, Deyo's greatness lies in his strongest ability to receive and defend the bottom line in history, including his right hand double reverse, which is also the first in history. Psychologically, in the most extreme environment, he can silently burst into amazing fighting capacity, which has happened many times-and this game reminds me of many bitter memories in the past.
The semifinal of the US Open 20 1 1 was also the fifth set, and it was also Federer's serve victory. Also, two match points were held at 40- 15. Deyue used the fighting style to hit the old cow's shot back and completed a stunning ace return, which also became the beginning of the amazing reversal of Deyue in that game. A year ago, in the US Open 20 10 semi-final, although Niu Lao also missed two match points in the deciding set, it was De Yue's serve after all. . .
20 12 French Open 1/4 finals to resolve multiple match point reversals and beat Tsonga; In the semi-final of 20 13 French Open, Nadal struggled to finish the break at the end of the fourth game, bringing the fourth game into a tiebreak and winning. Including last year's Wimbledon semi-final, there was a key game in the deciding set to constantly resolve Nadal's forced break point performance. . . I even think that compared with Nadal, Deyo's energy in the extreme environment and the extreme score is even more amazing-compared with Nadal's blood, Deyo showed shocking coldness in this life and death score.
Such a generally inferior ball may not have been played by others (even in Nadal's semi-final). As a result, Deyo won a game in which Federer played almost perfectly by relying on three tiebreaks. Besides, as a fan of Niu Lao, I have to say that Niu Lao actually ruined a lot of good games in this situation where victory is only one step away. When he polished himself technically, he was really ruthless, but psychologically, when victory was in sight, he often seemed too conservative, especially in the semi-final match against Nadal, he missed four match points and wasted two championship points in the final. . . However, ordinary opponents may not be able to make the old cow force to this point, that's all.
The hesitation of 5-2 and 6-5 against Safin in the semi-finals of the Australian Open in 2005, the excessive hesitation after breaking the big pineapple for the first time in the fourth set of the US Open final in 2009, the semi-finals of the US Open 10 and1/four match points missed by Germany and Jordan, and so on. . . I can't let go of every scene, but compared with today's regrets, those are even trivial things. . .
===================================================
Perhaps this is the so-called fate of character. As someone once said, if Ronaldinho is more self-disciplined, his achievements will be even more limitless. However, perhaps it is such a bohemian soul that can project such unrestrained imagination on the football field. Federer's tennis appreciation is unparalleled. He used almost all the batting techniques he could think of so properly and his technique was so perfect. But when it comes to fighting, I'm afraid Djokovic really doesn't have that big heart compared with his fiery ambition forged in the Yugoslav war.
So Federer and Djokovic reached the deciding set four times in the Grand Slam (10 US Open semifinal,1US Open semifinal, 14 Wimbledon final, and this epic final). Federer lost, and he was extremely weak every time. Maybe it's true. . . And when the old cow hit the ball in almost the same way and lost the game, did anyone think of Roddick who hit the ball for the last time 10 years ago? . .
Sorry for talking nonsense for a long time. Whenever I think my heart is quiet, I find that it is just not sad. . .
Released at 03:52? The copyright belongs to the author.
makcumj
I feel powerless for the old cow as soon as I take more shots, and I am always worried that he will hang the net in the backhand and forehand! The whole game was bumpy and the old cow went smoothly. As a result, the old cow lost on the key ball! In the deciding set, Niu Lao held two championship points in his own service victory, and his mentality was a little anxious. He tried to finish it quickly, but he lost four points in a row and was broken! I was so angry that I almost smashed my mobile phone! My heart is blocked! I know I'm in trouble!
Apophis
Think about the four counts that Roddick lost 6-2 in the finals ten years ago.
This is a fairy fight.
With Federer's return ball out of bounds, Dede, who won the match point, didn't throw away the racket and lie on the court with tears like most champions and enjoy a moment's release. Instead, after shaking hands with the cow, he slowly walked back to the center of his field, bent down, picked up a handful of Wembley grass, chewed it with great interest and tasted the taste of victory.
Xiaode has the strongest service receiving ability in the world and super reading ability in the game, as he said after the game: "This is also the game with the highest psychological requirements I have encountered in my life!" Roger federer dominated the grass a few years ago, with gorgeous SLR and elegant posture. This duel is to watch the whole game with quick-acting pills. No losers. Congratulations to Dede and salute to Federer. I am very happy to witness their wonderful confrontation over the years. I hope big3 will not retire too early.
Agree with this view!
Before 1 and 133 Wimbledon men's singles finals, Federer won eight times and Djokovic won five times, and the data has shown their greatness;
2. Deyue and Niu entered the final of Wimbledon as the world's first and second respectively, which is the second time in the history of Wimbledon, adding legend to this game;
3, nearly 5 hours, draw five games, grab seven games when the new rules decide to draw 12 games, so that the audience all over the world have had enough eye addiction;
4. Three tiebreaks in the audience, big score and small score, the data are quite close. The two men jointly expounded the whole content of the competition with wonderful performances, interpreted the classics and left them behind;
5, nearly five hours of competition, fierce and superb confrontation, even more exciting than Hollywood blockbusters, let the audience see the final feeling of * * *: there is no loser in this competition, and both of them deserve the championship!
Summary: The final trophy is not enough to praise the two players and the greatness of this game!
There are watches in our shop that can't be seen from the real ones. .....
20 19 Wimbledon ended with a tiebreak of 12. Some people say that trophies can't set off your greatness. what do you think?
Federer's perfect skills and vigorous state set off Djokovic's comprehensive skills and tough nerves! Djokovic's difficult victory set off Federer's gorgeous offensive style and the difficulty of maintaining a high level of competition. There was no Federer since then.
Greatness can't compare with you, Didi.
Virtue is great, not superior in technology and scene. Did he win by luck? No, he has a strong heart against adversity, and from a strategic point of view, he can give up what he should give up and get what he must win, and bring the rhythm of the game to his good opponent. severe