There are Alibaba in Asia and Google in the United States. Why are there no Internet giants in Europe?

cultural background. Some people say that the lack of unified writing in Europe is the main reason why they don't have Internet bosses. I beg to differ here. After all, Google and Alibaba are no longer confined to their own countries, but are constantly going abroad to the world. At this time, don't they also face this inconsistent writing? However, Alibaba and Google can become internet giants and blossom everywhere in the world, which is also inseparable from their emphasis on cultural background. Many people compare Ali with Amazon and think that Alibaba is the main reason.

the attitude and policy of the government. Some people say that the European Union's monopoly sanctions on Internet technology are the main reason to stifle the Internet economy in Europe, because as early as 21 years ago. Microsoft, a technology giant, was subjected to the "anti-monopoly" by the European Union because it bundled a video player into its operating system, and it was fined hundreds of millions of yuan. This anti-monopoly policy also triggered a series of butterfly effects, which cast a veil over the development of Internet technology. At this time, Europe naturally dared not venture into it, which also led to the lag of the development of Internet technology in Europe. I think this is also a factor that cannot be ignored. But at this time, China is also facing the same problem, but at this time, the China government still holds a wait-and-see attitude towards the Internet, but it also has a certain threshold for the development of the Internet and the entry of foreign Internet technology. This is the huge contradiction between China's growing material and cultural needs and backward productivity since the implementation of the reform and opening up policy. The huge potential demand and the reference of foreign advanced network technology are the main thrust for the development of e-commerce websites such as Alibaba.

economic development. Many people think that the Internet is the fourth revolution of the world economy, which can be said to be very reasonable. In the first industrial revolution, Britain stood out, in the second industrial revolution, the United States and Germany were the main thrust, and in the third, the United States and Japan led the way, which was called the fourth China. It has made three super internet companies in BAT. Every industrial revolution will bring huge economic benefits to the initiating countries. After many industrial revolutions, European countries such as Britain have also tasted a lot of sweetness. With the rapid economic development, the industry is based on services such as tourism finance, and people's lives are rich and welfare is good. This is also a big obstacle to promoting innovation. China is in the middle and high-speed stage of economic development. From the perspective of economic principles, China can use the demographic dividend to make the rate of return on capital investment higher than other countries. This is also the reason to promote the rapid development and innovation of the emerging Internet industry in China.

Of course, China, as a developing country, has made proud achievements in its scientific and technological development, but compared with other developed countries, there is still a way to go, and there is still much room for improvement in the development of Internet technology in China.

dogmatic antitrust will not only hurt a giant enterprise, but also bring serious consequences to the whole industry and even the global economy. Because, as a new economy and new format, Internet enterprises are not the same as traditional enterprises. With the birth of the super Internet platform, they will bring tangible benefits to consumers.

There have been anti-monopoly lawsuits against Internet companies in China, but the results are not the same. Qihoo 361 sued Tencent for abusing its dominant market position, but the Supreme People's Court did not support the lawsuit. This makes it clear that market share is not an absolute criterion in the process of determining market dominance. At the same time, it also shows that the law should emphasize development, anti-monopoly should not be absolutely uniform, and the particularity of the industry itself should be considered.

Just like we can't only see that Tmall, a subsidiary of Alibaba, has a market share of 57.7%, which is twice as high as that of JD.COM, the second place, but also see the benefits that Alibaba brings to consumers and society. Pay an average daily tax of 1 billion, create 31 million jobs, and empower 21 million small and medium-sized enterprises around the world! It has brought real benefits to consumers!

after all, it is not a sin to make an enterprise bigger and stronger. We need to correctly understand the essential purpose of the anti-monopoly law, avoid abusing it, and protect the healthy development of the new economic model!