First, the video clip class. The reporter signed up for a video editing training class by scanning the code and entered a WeChat group of about 150 people. In this group, there are contents released by the course manager that advocate various "cash play methods". The live course belongs to a bishop who claims to have 20 million fans. In addition to briefly introducing the recommendation rules of some video platforms, he spent most of his time "showing" his performance in realizing goods through the platform, claiming: "The recent daily income is at least 19000 yuan."
At the end of the course, the "lecturer" said that he could teach 15 students "one-on-one", not only teaching them various cash-out skills, giving fans and matching goods sources, but also promising that if students work full-time, their monthly income will not be less than 10000 yuan from the second month, but they will have to pay the course fee of 2990 yuan. Some students paid the money.
Second, the short video platform content processing class. There are such advertisements on many social platform accounts, claiming that "you don't need to know English, you don't need to know how to shoot clips. As long as you master the rules of" processing "and" carry "the videos released by domestic short video platforms to overseas versions, you can wait for" traffic realization "to make a lot of money.
Third, "learning' psychological listener' can not only get a professional certificate, but also make money part-time." In order to persuade reporters to pay for classes, the staff of a training institution has repeatedly stressed that certificates will be issued after training, and the institution will also "send orders" to students to earn money part-time. However, when the reporter asked about the frequency and method of issuing "what certificates" and part-time "dispatching orders", the staff member was vague. Other trainings such as "dubbing implementation" and "data analyst" also have the problem of being misnamed.
Many job seekers have participated in this training course, and more than 1000 members have participated in many live online courses attended by journalists, many of whom are eager to find jobs or are currently trying to find jobs.
Trapped everywhere, students' rights and interests cannot be guaranteed.
The network "sideline training trap" has some distinct "routines".
First, most of them are "1 yuan tuition", "0 yuan tuition" and "can make a lot of money", and then they frequently send messages and make phone calls to induce students to buy courses at high prices. The cost of related courses ranges from several thousand yuan to several hundred thousand yuan.
Second, training institutions often "promise" that students can recommend or "send orders" to provide part-time money-making opportunities after paying high tuition fees to buy courses. However, the reporter found that most of these promises could not be fulfilled at all. "I promised to earn my tuition back in 20 days, and now I have not fulfilled it in 40 days." A student in a short video editing class said. Many experts from the Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences said that they had never heard of the profession of psychological listener.
Third, the training effect is not worthy of the name and the quality is poor. According to many students, some training lecturers give very shallow lectures, or even paste them from the internet, which has almost no practical value; Some training lecturers let students spend hundreds of dollars to buy dubbing software to make video explanations, but they can't release them; There is also a training course on lecturer identity fraud. The reporter contacted a well-known film and television blogger, who is said to teach editing courses. He said: "Someone on the Internet impersonated me to sell classes."
Faced with such a trap, once the students are recruited, their legitimate rights and interests are often not guaranteed. The reporter searched a number of online complaint platforms and found that there were hundreds of complaints against the above-mentioned institutions, most of which were "non-refundable".