I have read this book in primary school for five thousand years, and I can still remember it. I also looked at the historical records (it's not difficult, I can't understand a word in middle school textbooks, so I can play with them). I specially read Biography of the First Emperor (or Qin Benji), which seems to be separated for many years. It is not as fantastic as Lv Buwei's Biography, but simply tells that Evonne married a stranger and then gave birth to a child. (However, it was blinded by the story of Shen Jun and Chu Gaoliang in the spring. Why hasn't this been interpreted? )

At that time, it seemed to me that this was a very big "discovery", although I couldn't count the years at that time and couldn't tell the specific reasons. Pupils who know history will be praised by teachers. It's good to raise your hand and talk about some background knowledge when you are talking about the text.

Junior high school (in fact, strictly speaking, Yi Zhongtian's taste of the Three Kingdoms when he was a child is a bit of a symptom) began to contact the history in magazines and subverted the original cognition. At that time, I felt really fucking dark. You were still borrowing arrows from a straw boat. Liu Bei Renyi was a scum and didn't know the real history.

I don't talk about high school, I study hard in boarding school, and the reading of Chinese teachers is limited to texts. The usual example is the TV series Kangxi Dynasty and Hanwu Emperor. Lu You can't tell the Southern Song Dynasty from the Northern Song Dynasty. I forgot what I said at that time. At that time, I knew that history was neither bad nor bad, and I was not afraid of writing without material.

When I was in college, I was screened by WeChat articles at first, and I also paid attention to several xx histories. Later, I gradually felt that these articles were grandstanding, and there was no dry goods, just like the marketing number that was pushed to me from time to time. I began to read some formal books, especially the Harvard China History Series, and understood that history is history. China has a long history, and there are people with lofty ideals who serve the country and the people. The invaders slaughtered people, lashed the desert, beheaded countless people, and brought about great ethnic integration.

It's all over.

History is a discipline, an academic and a knowledge. It doesn't matter if the knowledge points are not clear. It's not a bad thing to learn some history by using ancient metaphors (although it's not clear whether it's right or not). Can be used as a reference. It would be better if it can help our daily life and work. At least, we can visit the museum without feeling nothing about the cultural relics of Yin Ruins.

But history is history. It is good to know history. It is not so good to bring some habits of rice circles into history.