Telegony is actually a virgin complex. Telegony thinks that if a woman has an ex-boyfriend, they have had sex, and then she marries another man and gives birth to a child, but the child looks like her ex-boyfriend.
From the perspective of genetics, this statement is of course wrong, and there is no corresponding exact evidence in nature. Some people take Pavlov's pig experiment to illustrate this point. However, this is just a normal genetic variation. Just like Mendel's early genetic experiment on peas, when peas are heterozygotes, self-pollination or mutual reproduction will lead to the separation of traits of offspring, such as pod traits. The defect of Pavlov's experiment is that he used all hybrid pigs, that is, the genotype of pigs is heterozygote, so it is normal for offspring to have character segregation. Domestic pigs in modern China are mainly stable pigs obtained through hybridization and inbreeding, and domestic pigs basically only produce white pigs when mating.
Many traits of complex organisms are controlled by multiple genes, which will lead to different genotypes of offspring, so their mating will naturally lead to the separation of traits. For example, in the experiment of pigs, white pigs and black pigs gave birth to white pigs, flowers and black pigs, and white pigs and white pigs can still give birth to these three kinds. As far as people are concerned, albinism is an autosomal recessive genetic disease. Albinism only occurs when the genotype is labeled aa, but some people can carry this gene without albinism. Their genotype can be Aa. When two people with aa get married, the genotypes of their offspring may be Aa, Aa, AA, and only 1/4 will suffer from albinism. This theoretical figure is close to the statistical law of population, and the probability of albinism produced by aa mating with Aa is 1/2, which is also in line with statistics.
This albinism is controlled by a single gene, so the character separation is not obvious, but it is also obvious to have albinism. If an albino has been in love with an Aa, according to telegony's point of view, if he marries an Aa and gives birth to children, then all the children born are inherited from his ex-boyfriend, and the genotype is AA, so no children will get albino. According to telegony, that doesn't mean looking for someone with a history of love, otherwise it would be embarrassing to have a child who looks like others but doesn't look like himself. This view is nothing more than sticking to some outdated complex and fabricating a seemingly everything evidence in a decent way, which is simply.
To say the least, everyone's genes are unique. Rapid changes in genes are common in carcinogenesis of tissues and cells. Because cancer cells quickly become anti-intelligent, they will produce more mutations soon. And can human communication activities change individual genes? Of course not, even if there is sexual activity, the role of male germ cells after entering the female reproductive tract is to combine with female germ cells. Male germ cells, that is, sperm can't invade female somatic cells like viruses, and their genes can't be integrated into female genome. If this happens, then the result of women is death. Sperm contains haploid genome. If it can be integrated into female genes, it will be a huge change, and cells will die in this change.
Having said that, I mean not to make excuses for some complexity, but to find someone who has no love history. There is no need to fabricate such a seemingly abstruse evidence. No modern scientist supports this view, because genetic laws exclude it. The genes of the human body remain independent. You are you and he is him. The two can't be in contact all the time, resulting in genetic entanglement, that is, your body can't be integrated into other people's genes.
I am a doctor of medicine (non-biology). I studied epigenetics a little before. Telegony phenomenon has been reported in a large number of documents (I mean SCI), with experimental proof and theoretical system. Of course, only insects and mice. Related phenomena were also found in the crowd, but they were not tested and the evidence was insufficient. It is definitely not just DNA sequence that determines human phenotypic characteristics! More modified status of DNA! Those who say that heredity is only determined by DNA and DNA only exists in the nucleus are definitely high school biology! We all know that Newton's law only applies to high school macro physics, not to micro. The knowledge learned in high school is by no means a comprehensive truth! My point is that people's inheritance is not just as simple as DNA sequence, and some of their father's living habits (such as drinking and smoking) will be passed on to their offspring by changing DNA modification (not changing sequence). So heredity is influenced by many aspects. Although it has not been confirmed by remote heredity in humans, it does not rule out the possibility!
At present, telegony's arguments are basically from animals.
Pigs or dogs.
However, the physiological structure of human beings is different from that of other animals.
A woman is sure that implantation is based on her menstrual period.
The dog's period is about once every six months.
That is, human women can't determine the biological father of their children within one month, while dogs are half a year.
In addition, modern DNA detection technology has not verified this in remote genetics.
The old argument has fatal flaws, but the new argument does not, which is basically unreliable.
However, this statement is very poisonous. Why?
This sounds like a threat to the humiliation of female sluts or the encouragement of female chastity.
Well, this is what I understood when I first heard about it.
Until later, when I came to western history, or biographies, I always emphasized the argument of keeping chastity before marriage and raising a lover after marriage.
For example, Amblin and Henry VIII hung out for a long time, but they stayed together until they got married. For example, the mystery of Richard III's life has never been clear. For example, after Peter was circumcised in yekaterina, the female official who had watched her die began to encourage her to find a lover.
Until the Queen in the Wind, the female companion and the French king did everything, but they didn't really do it. One day, the French king demanded that her companion tell the French king that if she wanted to marry a noble, she must remain chaste, so that her future children's inheritance rights could be guaranteed.
Grab it! Telegony is a legal proof that the cuckolded husband honestly gave his property to his wife who didn't know whether he had children with himself or his lover.
A noble husband must be the late father of his wife and children. No matter whether his wife is the lover of a superior person or not, whether there is a little German shepherd or not, the child must have the characteristics of his late father.
All right, leave your money. You can go to hell.
Therefore, I don't know why it is worth asking today. Isn't it a little uncomfortable not to wear a cuckold?
Telegony believes that the offspring of a man and a woman will inherit the characteristics of his ex-girlfriend or her ex-boyfriend. Isn't this bullshit? A white woman fell in love with a black man and then married a white man. Will her children be black?
Modern genetics is based on genes, which are the most important things in human body. How to communicate with each other in sexual activities? Human genes can be mutated, and mutation can also be inherited, but this statement is really thoughtless. Two people who are in contact will not have their own genes because they have been together, even the most intimate contact.
Due to the function of human immune system, ordinary human cells will be killed after entering others' bodies. For example, if you lose the wrong blood, hemolysis will occur. Only in the process of reproduction can the cells of the two combine. But this combination is only the combination of germ cells. The haploid chromosomes of the two are paired into sister chromatids, which becomes a diploid fertilized egg with all the genes needed for development.
This process will not change the original genes of the human body. Retrovirus can cause genetic changes in human body. When the virus infects the human body, it can integrate the genome into human genes, so that the virus can reproduce through human cells, and at the same time, it can be passed on to the next generation of human beings with the help of human reproduction. 8% of the genes in the human body come from this virus. Because with the long-term evolution of human beings, these virus genes have been integrated with the human body and will not cause human diseases. Viruses are constantly multiplying, and human beings are endless, which means immortality.
However, human germ cells are not viruses. They don't have the ability. They don't infect people, but integrate genes into each other's bodies. Human cells themselves are diploid chromosome groups, and then they fuse a set of chromosomes. There is a strange situation in human beings, that is, the germ cells make mistakes in the process of combination. Some chromosomes fused. There was one case in China, and there is only one case at present. Chromosomes 15 and 14 fuse together, but this happens in a single cell, that is, in a fertilized egg, and it does not absorb other chromosomes.
The function of germ cells is only combined with germ cells of the opposite sex, so telegony's view was rejected by geneticists, and the subject's narrative was a problem, and not many scientists supported this view. In actual animal breeding, there are basically no cases. The horn rope in Australia was once thought to have a distant ancestor phenomenon, but it was found to be an insect development problem, not related to DNA, but related to heredity.
In the United States, there are many cases in which two black couples gave birth to white children or white children, but this has nothing to do with TV heredity. The reason is that the United States is a multi-ethnic country, and many people have been mixed-race for generations. Although it seems that some traits, such as skin color, are different from those of parents, it is also because parents are mixed-race. When sperm and eggs combine, they only form a genome that determines light skin color, and the other situation is the opposite.
Distant ancestors have always been regarded as pseudoscience, so there is no scientist to support them. It is mainly related to some complex, that is, thinking that your object has no love history before, some people will have some activities together, which will lead to subtle physiological changes, and some people can't accept this.
Grandfather, is it true? 20 14 it is reported that a newborn looks like her mother's old lover, but it can be confirmed that this woman did not cheat during her marriage, which may be the so-called distant ancestor. However, the authenticity of this information is difficult to verify. Moreover, telegony originally thought it was "BC", which meant that future generations would inherit some characteristics of the mother's ex-male partner, but this assumption has long been proved by modern gene theory and has no scientific basis.
At one time, telegony even became an online buzzword. What's more, it proves that scientists clearly agree with it [telegony], and the experimental results of animals such as pigs, dogs and mice are used as evidence. However, people and animals are different. Even Pavlov's pigs used heterozygotes. The offspring of hybrid pigs will be separated in traits whether they are self-bred or cross-bred, which is not necessarily related to who the hybrid pigs have mated with.
Besides, Darwin never put forward the so-called distant ancestors. When the farm mated with a wild zebra, a white mare failed to reproduce, and then the white mare mated with another white stallion gave birth to striped offspring, not because it inherited the wild zebra that had been mated before, but because the horse with stripes on its legs had a very common atavism in heredity.
So, some people may still find it hard to believe. Let me give you another common example. I don't know if you have ever had Garfield with short hair. You know Garfield's atavism is very common. Two short-haired Garfield cats are likely to have long-haired offspring. This is because Garfield was originally bred artificially by long-haired Persian cats and other short-haired cats. So no matter what Garfield's appearance and pedigree are, it is possible to produce long-haired atavistic offspring, and I ..
In essence, after so many years, some people still ask whether "telegony" is true or not. There are at least two possibilities, either a person who has a "virgin plot" and hopes that his other half will have no other partner before this; Either you really don't know anything, and when you hear someone say it, you will go online to verify it. Of course, in either case, this is personal freedom, one is emotional concept, and the other is asking if you don't know.
In fact, even where the telegony hypothesis spreads, it initially means that future generations inherit some characteristics of their parents' predecessors, not specifically female predecessors. Some people say that this statement can be traced back to Britain 14 century ago. Moreover, there are no academic research papers of famous scientists about this hypothesis at present.
As the saying goes, rumors stop with wise men. If a person doesn't even know the basic knowledge, or even transmits some incorrect information, it is likely to lead to tragedy. There are thousands of people in the world, and there are many people who look alike. But if your child looks almost exactly like his predecessor, don't check whether telegony is true at this time, just go to a professional institution for genetic testing, but before that, you should also think about how to face the possible results.
In a word, although my father's hypothesis can be traced back to Darwin's time, this statement without scientific basis has long been abandoned. Some people say that heredity itself is very complicated, and it is possible that the knowledge of modern science is still very limited, and the current cognition can not directly deny the possibility of the existence of distant ancestors. However, if all the proved pseudoscientific viewpoints must retain the possibility of existence, why are some people unwilling to believe the basic facts they already know?
People sometimes just want to believe what they want to believe, which has nothing to do with what kind of education he/she has received. As some people have questioned, if humans evolved from primates for at least several million years, why are there so many monkeys in zoos now? Have they stopped?
Of course not. All the animals on the earth are constantly evolving. Those species that haven't changed much actually show that they are even more adaptable to the environment than humans.
Although human beings are the only intelligent life known in the whole universe at present, this does not mean that we are the most successful in evolution, and reproduction is always one of the important signs of the success of species evolution. For example, the evolutionary history of snakes on the earth is over 1 100 million years. Does it mean that they didn't create social civilization?
After reading so many comments, I really think that the nine-year compulsory education in China is still too short!
I have seen telegony's views on many platforms, which are basically supported by some ignorant men who like to advocate virginity.
Not to mention whether they know genetics, I estimate that biology may not know much.
The material basis of heredity is dna. If the fetus wants to live, it must be 23 pairs, 46, and not more than one. Tell me, how did my father's dna get into the fertilized egg?
Welcome to argue. I won't talk about other cytoplasmic inheritance if you don't talk about it.
This hypothesis has not been confirmed, and the so-called geneticist support is a bit unreliable.
I remember that telegony's propagandists used epigenetics as their theoretical basis. Epigenetics is a normal academic branch, which mainly studies the mechanism that gene expression is influenced by environmental factors. But epigenetics can't support telegony's statement.
If geneticists support epigenetics, that is normal. But I've never seen anyone support telegony. If others advocate it, you need to prove it.
One more thing. When promoting "distant ancestor", take Princess Diana as an example, but in my opinion, this example is just the opposite of "distant ancestor", which proves that distant ancestor is not established. The following quotation does not mean that I agree with their views ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————.
No one in the British royal family has ever had red hair, but the little prince Harry is an exception. This puzzled Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth II: "My son Charles is not red-haired, and neither is my daughter-in-law Dai Fei, isn't it ..." Needless to say, such a thing is hard to let go of anyone's head, let alone the British royal family, which has always defended the pure blood of the family. The next story is expected.
Although Diana had good reasons and was extremely reluctant, at the insistence of Prince Philip, her arm could not be twisted on her thigh after all, and she had to take two little princes, William and Harry, to have a blood test to be DNA paternity. Just when the members of the royal family were full of various moods and speculations, the appraisal result came out: William and Harry were indeed Charles' sons. Although Diana was acquitted in the end, Prince Philip also put down the big stone in his heart. But I still don't understand why Prince Harry has red hair.
It is said that in order to protect the children's young hearts from harm, until their death in 1997, Princess Diana did not tell her two sons why they took their blood at that time. However, things are far from as simple as paternity testing. When people suspected that Diana had misbehaved, the British royal family had learned that Diana's secret admirer was Royal Army officer james hewitt.
————————————————————————
This example was once regarded as evidence of a "distant ancestor", but unfortunately, Princess Diana's first man was Prince Charles. Obviously, telegony's display here didn't work.
Telegony's view was first put forward by Europeans. They observed that some animals have the characteristics of distant inheritance.
At that time, due to the lack of scientific verification means, this theory has always been considered as a hypothesis. Up to now, scientists in related fields will not do such research.
Because confirmation and falsification are not good. It's easier said than done, and it's fake. Just laugh it off. And if it is true, it will have a great impact on human morality. Especially in relatively open countries such as Europe and America.
Therefore, it is a thankless thing to study remote inheritance.
However, last year, scientists in Europe found that during pregnancy, fetal blood cells will flow into the mother's body. They detected fetal blood cells from multiple organs and tissues of pregnant women, and half of the fetal genes came from the father. In other words, the genes of the fetal father are passed on to the fetus, and the genes of the fetus enter the mother. At that time, research said that these genes would have an impact on mothers.
It can be seen from the report that the experimental results are very vague, perhaps the experiment has not been finalized, or it is not convenient to elaborate because of some social problems.
Although it seems to us that modern science has been developed, the research on human body is still in the primary stage. For example, in modern medicine, the treatment of quite a few diseases still stays at the stage of "treating the headache, treating the pain in the foot" and "cutting off the disease". In fact, the relationship between human organs and tissues is complicated, and the genetic relationship is more complicated. Human medical genetics still has a long way to go.
To sum up, telegony's theory has not been proved or falsified, and the truth is unknown.
I won't talk about people ... take cats for example. My family has a siamese cat. The first time I didn't have the experience of matching cats, I hastily found a male Siamese cat with a broken tail. I gave birth to four kittens, two of which had broken tails, which was a lesson from the past. The second time, I specially found a healthy male Siam who is experienced in matching cats. I was born with a folded tail ... I checked carefully, and the children born to male cats and other female cats didn't have a folded tail. Then the third nest, the cat, didn't have a broken tail ... The fourth nest had a slight broken tail. Is it really atavism?