CCTV's Lecture Room 200 1 was launched, and it has been almost 20 years now, which once set off an upsurge of ancient culture among the audience. The audience not only likes watching the program itself, but also likes famous teachers who tell history, such as Yi Zhongtian, Ji Lianhai and Wang Liqun. Most of the programs are male teachers, and Yu Dan and Meng Man are at least two intellectual women among men.

After Yu Dan, another master of Chinese studies was ousted.

Lecture Room is a cultural program that was once very popular with the audience. Since 200 1 went online, it has attracted wide attention. Because "Lecture Room" invited famous professors and people with status and fame. Yu Dan, a professor at Beijing Normal University, was invited to tell the Confucian classic The Analects in Lecture Room.

The Analects of Confucius is a book that records the lectures and dialogues between Confucius and his disciples. Since ancient times, it has had the reputation of "Half-part Analects of Confucius governs the world", which has an important influence on China culture. Yu Dan's views on The Analects of Confucius are distinct and loved by many audiences. However, after Yu Dan became popular, he became more and more arrogant. When telling the Analects of Confucius in other columns, it even involves a lot of subjective assumptions and even misinterprets the contents of the Analects. As a public figure, his influence is not great.

In addition, Yu Dan's lifestyle has also been criticized by people. Once, Yu Dan gave a speech in Peking University, but he was coaxed off the stage by his own students. Since then, he has completely fallen into the "altar." After Dan, another "master of Chinese studies" is controversial. The master of Chinese studies is Meng Man, an associate professor in the history department of Minzu University of China.

What did Meng Nan do wrong?

Meng Man's biggest mistake is to bring these modern civilizations to places where they shouldn't have appeared. We also know that on some large-scale occasions, we should talk about these civilizations with the most serious and initial attitude, and should not be entertained, nor should we apply modern civilizations.

Anyone who really understands this knowledge has some knowledge, which makes him know the dissemination channels and ideas of this knowledge. Therefore, if we apply modern civilization and entertain ourselves, it is just like watching children fight, which is particularly boring and naive.

One consequence of such a pipeline is to make these professionals look unprofessional, or to say that what they express is not good and looks attractive. From a professional point of view, this is not a professional attitude, nor should a professional teacher do it.

No one is perfect.

What's more, Meng Man's explanation didn't go wrong, but he suffered from long-term online abuse. Even if the person who was later controlled by emotions recovered and realized the truth, how many people would sincerely apologize for the misunderstanding and insult her? Therefore, when you see exciting remarks on the Internet, don't believe them lightly and get involved in the wave of emotions at will. What we should do is to let the bullets fly for a while and let the truth surface slowly.

Although Professor Meng Man has many views on history, he can also bring people a refreshing view. However, when she is explaining ancient poems, especially when doing TV cultural festivals, she still needs to accumulate some experience and explain them more rigorously. In this regard, netizens have said that she is also called a master? After all, there are too many masters now, and not many really have ink in their bellies.