In Mencius and Zhang Wan, he also admitted that Yu was a saint rather than a son. However, "the sage of heaven is a sage, and the son of heaven is a son", which cannot violate the "destiny". You see, "Yu Jian is beneficial to the sky" is intended to spread the sage. But "in seven years, Yu collapsed, and after three years of mourning, Yu's son was sheltered in the shadow of Jishan Mountain, and it was useless to go to prison, saying,' My son is also.' Eulogize, eulogize enlightenment without eulogizing interests, and say,' My son also. "In this way, Kay was naturally acclaimed as king, and the benefits of always standing aside naturally collapsed. This is fate. What can we do? Under the guise of "fate", everything is so smooth and solved, and all contradictions and struggles are gone and cancelled. Is there such a strange thing in the world?

It's just that Confucian people lie with their eyes closed in order to beautify history when they tamper with it.

For example, the historian Sima Qian wrote ancient historical materials based on folklore and individual relics, which was at best inferred but not confirmed.

The banquet at Hongmen is wonderful, but the content and plot of the dialogue may not be restored. Even if it is recorded in the official history, most historians who encounter reality are credible. If you meet emperors who tamper with history and unprincipled historians. The recorded content may be biased.

For example, Xu lived to the age of 81 in the Tang Dynasty, and was posthumously awarded by the emperor as the first-class Yitong Third Division. Indeed, this man is not as presumptuous and arrogant as Li Yifu, but he is equally bad. When he presided over the work of the National History Museum, he used power for personal gain: he did not hesitate to take bribes, and his hatred increased.

Li Shimin tampered with and changed history. However, most of the twenty-four histories are historical facts of later generations, and we can only refer to the information recorded by historians of the previous dynasties. As long as the records of historians of past dynasties are wrong, the information of the twenty-four histories they compiled becomes less true.