First, AI just makes the face in the painting more vivid.
AI's face restoration is not through scientific research or inputting other data into computer-generated faces, but based on ancient paintings, the faces on ancient paintings are reprocessed to get a similar historical figure. This technology does restore the appearance of a historical figure to a certain extent, and it can also give people a more vivid impression of the figure. On the other hand, due to the lack of scientific research and data, the accuracy of this technology is not high. Strictly speaking, it just makes the face on the painting more vivid.
Second, AI restoration technology is subject to ancient paintings.
As I just said, this technology is based on ancient paintings. However, ancient paintings are the product of artists' artistic processing, and there is still a big gap between them and the real features of the characters. In addition, most of them are ink paintings, and the nature of ink paintings will further enlarge this gap. Therefore, although AI restoration technology can make the faces of historical figures more realistic, there is a certain error with reality. It is precisely because of this error that it cannot be said that the accuracy of AI reduction technology is high.
Generally speaking, the accuracy of this AI reduction technology is not high, but it has great development potential.