Recently, netizens set off a wave of "re-creation" in Du Fuxiang, and this article was published in Weibo or other websites.
Among them, Du Fu sometimes carried a machine gun, sometimes rode a white horse, sometimes rode a motorcycle, sometimes set up a stall to sell watermelons, and sometimes turned into a plumber ... A good netizen named this series: "Du Fu is very busy: riding a white horse after riding a motorcycle, selling watermelons after delivering water".
? The portrait of "poet sage" was spoofed, which caused a controversy.
Some people worry that Du Fu is humble but worried about the country and the people. For such a poet, spoofing his portrait is a manifestation of poor thinking and lack of faith.
The president of a poetry association called for: "spoofing cannot be without the national bottom line and spiritual light!" Of course, in the face of the hat of "national bottom line", netizens will be a little surprised.
Nowadays, the spoofing and deconstruction of serious culture is no longer a new trend, and Du is by no means the first person to be spoofed.
For example, in 2008, there was a "Confucius Program for All". In the creation of netizens, Confucius was forced to get married, sold fried chicken, worked as an unsuccessful broadcaster ... and: Li Bai, "the bright line at the foot of my bed" became "toothless"; Qu Yuan, registered as a trademark of pig feed; The Monkey King fell in love with Princess Iron Fan ... This is simply "nothing is impossible, only unexpected".
Hugh, who once spoofed the movie The Promise into a video of a bloody case caused by a steamed bun, said, "Spoofing is a new kind of joke.
Evil does not mean bad, nor does it mean malice. "Perhaps, in the eyes of young people who are crazy about doodling all saints, spoof is just a game. It has no special malice or profound purpose-it doesn't care about anything, doesn't pursue anything, doesn't satirize anything, and only focuses on the present * * *, playing and laughing.
No wonder some people argue illogically that graffiti on Du Fu's portrait is "completely out of deep love for Du Fu".
You see, it's so rambling and irrelevant.
Although "Du Fuxiang" itself is the work of Jiang, a master figure painter, at the peak of his life, I believe that the young man who added a white horse or motorcycle to Du Fu is by no means pursuing the art of Duchamp adding a moustache to Mona Lisa, nor does he deviate from the traditional aesthetic values.
Therefore, criticizing "Du Fu is very busy" as a spoof lacks "bottom line" or "belief", which is probably like telling some young people to cotton.
In the final analysis, the essence of this kind of spoof is a kind of boredom, or as the spoofer himself said, "an outlet", I am afraid there is no purpose to oppose mainstream values.
The author believes that this kind of spoof certainly needs appropriate criticism and targeted guidance, but as long as there is no bad or vulgar content and ideas, you may wish to relax and not worry too much.
Du Fu will not lose the honor of "Poet Saint" because of graffiti, and the traditional culture of China will not be shamed.
What is worrying is, is the popularity of the "spoof" culture to vent emotions the cause or result of the fading of classics? Apart from the meaningless self-creation of young people, do our textbooks, educators and cultural creators provide a variety of approachable ways for them to understand and fall in love with traditional culture? Or create a touching contemporary classic, sing the first voice, change the style of writing, and resist the popular de-historization and de-contextualization in contemporary culture.
Du Fu said: "Two Cao's name is destroyed, and the rivers are abandoned forever."
He probably doesn't care how to be "spoofed", because he has long concluded that those noises and fragments, no matter how noisy and beautiful they were, will eventually turn into the wind blowing in the wind, and the true spiritual light of national culture has never been so fragile.
?