Vipassana means "seeing oneself from the outside" (the viewpoint in intellectualism). In contrast, mindfulness is to keep self-reflective awareness, and there is no distinction between internal and external, human and me. Of course, mindfulness cannot enter the interior of others. This is the self-limitation of mindfulness. The rest of this space-the psychological state of others-is left to empathy.

Mindfulness is equivalent to experiencing the true nature of life. On the other hand, Vipassana is equivalent to being aware of the internal (psychological) process without judgment.

Mindfulness and Vipassana are actually describing an ideal psychological state, which is not completely in line with reality.

The ideal of mindfulness lies in being right and being "so". How could you do that? We are not cameras, video cameras, tape recorders or burners!

Our subjective world will more or less have an indelible impact on the external world (cognitive object).

In order to fundamentally eliminate this influence and achieve the ideal, mindfulness requires us to be unfocused and tireless. This can only be regarded as a portrayal of the cultivation process, but not as a "positive result" of some cultivation.

Vipassana is essentially a portrayal of the process of spiritual practice. Its ideal part lies in "no judgment".

It is our nature to judge all the time. This is determined by the need of survival and the evolutionary history of millions of years.

The goal of training is to maintain an impartial and neutral position to look at one's emotional experience.

Don't be serious, don't be involved (or embedded), no matter how painful and unfortunate your feelings are, treat them as passing clouds and clouds, as "skeleton Zen"

The highest achievement of Vipassana cultivation becomes a calm and quiet inner "if you don't move"; The highest achievement of mindfulness cultivation is the omnipresent "harmony between man and nature".