Yue Ming's contribution is inaccurate, and the records in history books may not be accurate. Yue Ming first picked up the Ming history that we didn't care about or didn't understand, which made us re-understand the greatness of this dynasty, the greatness of the emperor protecting the country and the greatness of the Han people. It's no exaggeration to regard him as a contemporary Luo Guanzhong. More importantly, Yue Ming doesn't read dead books. He is teaching people to analyze problems and reasons from all aspects, and treat history books as grandfathers.
The book What Happened in the Ming Dynasty should be treated dialectically, saying that it is meritorious because it tells us the 274-year history of Daming in funny language. Reading history books is no longer boring, but it is said that it misled many illiterate people in history. Generally speaking, the merits are greater than the demerits. I have never read such an interesting book because I like history.
After reading Shi Ming, I always feel that the editor has some strange comments that he is not a good emperor but a good man! Is it so popular just to abolish martyrdom before death? When he ascended the throne, he heard that the queen of Zhu Rongji was going to be martyred, but they didn't stop him. Later, when Zhu Qiyu died, he urged the jailer to pull a group of brothers-in-law to be martyred. How hypocritical! Besides, even if he saved 1000 queens in the late Ming Dynasty, it was far less than the hundreds of subjects he killed in the civil fort. He really had the courage to come back and grab the throne. I recently learned that Zhu Jianshen is as diligent as Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhu Youtang!
1. In that year, Yue Ming never said that he knew Wang Yangming's mind, and he frankly only introduced Wang Yangming's enlightenment process. 2. In that year, Yue Ming introduced that Wang Yangming believed that human desires existed objectively, not that he respected human desires, but that he analyzed and solved problems based on human desires. 3. Finding a practical method is not the same as combining theory with practice. To sum up, you haven't read anything about the Ming Dynasty seriously at all, just an armchair bookworm.
Other natural sciences may be boring and serious, but history should never be like this. Good history books must be authentic and have literary value! Historical records, history as a mirror, which one is not wonderful? However, some serious historical documents in your mouth are completely outside the book! I should have known that only professional historical researchers would pay attention to such textual research books. Most people have seen the twenty-four histories, which is already very powerful!
The greatest contribution of the bright moon in that year was to arouse the public's enthusiasm for reading history and let ordinary readers know that history books can be so interesting. A history book is like a movie, no matter how gorgeous the picture is, it is also a failed work if it doesn't tell a story, which is why Historical Records and As a Mirror have such a high status. Imagine that if all history books are as serious and boring as you say, then there will only be fewer and fewer history lovers, and in the end, I am afraid they will really be "elite" literature!
Through a lot of reading and understanding, Wang Yangming discovered the true essence of Confucianism, rather than Zhu Xue's propaganda, and some knowledge of Confucianism was expanded to benefit the ruling class, especially Zhu Xue. I think Wang Yangming criticized it very well. The root of Confucianism was found, and the relevant contents were recorded in the manual. If you know, you will know, and you will know its goodness. What is told to students in the workbook is relatively easy for students to understand, and the integration of knowledge and practice is by no means that simple. Confucianism itself is a branch of Taoism. The ideas of predecessors are not easy to interpret. Maybe he has the same status, experience and era.
People with similar personalities can read roughly. Kings, courtiers, generals, civilians and beggars. There must be different views on psychology. If I want to understand, knowing means knowing that I have to work hard to survive, and the unity of knowing and doing means changing the status quo through action. Let yourself live harder. What is good and what is evil. But relatively speaking, profit is not conducive to others, profit has been for himself, and profit has been for him. After all, you are not a saint, and you can't benefit others at the expense of yourself. I can understand at this stage. Maybe when life becomes relaxed and elegant, you will have a higher experience.
I know that the definite things are not consistent with the official history, but I hope the real history is like this, because the characters written by Yue Ming are more like "people". I believe that no matter how great and humble people are in history, their premise is one person, and the development of history is human. I believe that history is not only the development of commodity economy and the bud of capitalism. They are not gods, but people with their own helplessness and emotions. I believe that everything they do is not only profit-driven, even the smallest people have great moments.
The history of the Ming Dynasty written by the Qing Dynasty is not enough to explain the problem. Yuan Chonghuan can't say for sure. Mercenaries respect themselves, take the Qing soldiers around Beijing and then clear the way. You want the emperor to see your performance, but I will kill you. What's the use of your excellent strategy? Taking the emperor as a pawn is the most intolerable. The crux of the problem lies in the fact that the limited productive forces and relations of production cannot meet the luxury of the nobility and the basic needs of the people at the same time, and the social distribution is seriously unbalanced.
Personally, knowledge refers to cognition and action refers to action, that is, theory should be put into practice. Interpreted as conscience, it is more or less appropriate. Conscience is biased towards the moral level, which is not the scope of cognition, but narrower than cognition, that is, morality and action. Therefore, the theory of mind is interpreted as serving people with virtue and governing the country with virtue. This is the traditional Confucianism of Zhu, which is the opposition between man and nature and rational. Xin Xue developed from Neo-Confucianism, but criticized Neo-Confucianism. It advocates the unity of heaven and man, that is, the principle of heart. Xu Jie and Zhang are both representatives of mind and nature. They are pragmatic, and their cognition and action are unified. To put it bluntly, it means not being single-minded, not out of line, and doing whatever you want, which is tested by practice.
You are all great gods, and you have all read the Ming history. Why didn't a great god express the history of the Ming Dynasty in such interesting words before the bright moon? What did all the great gods do? But mingyue's book is very hot, so you come to find fault, so you look knowledgeable? Those things in the Ming dynasty are not history books or textbooks, and they need not be responsible to anyone. Yue Ming also said that these are just some personal notes he saw in the history books of the Ming Dynasty. Because of him, I know that history is so interesting that every historical figure is no longer an abstract text, which is enough. As for who is a good person and who is a bad person, it has long been concluded.
First, after the restoration of Ming Yingzong, we must support our own people. Do you want to let body double team wait for him to recover? Second: Everyone who killed Yu Qian in the Ming Dynasty was a sinner, except Zhu Qizhen. Yu Qian is a courtier of Zhu Qizhen. He made a mistake and pulled him off the throne. He also supported the abolition of the prince on behalf of the ancestors. Zhu Qizhen is sorry for the country and people, but he is not sorry for Yu Qian. When he signed it himself, he was asked to represent the Ministry of War. It was Yu Qian who made the decision, and Yu Qian personally guaranteed it in front of Dai Zong. Queen Qian exchanged food for eunuchs by weaving cloth. It was Xu Youzhen who tipped off that he had participated in the abolition of the British Sect, and he was furious and wanted to kill him. Who is sorry? Thirdly, it is said that Yingzong reused those people in Shi Heng, and Yingzong has just been reset. Don't you want to die without them?
Who do you think will be late? Li Xian is a seller who pursues glory, but what about Yu Qian? From another perspective, isn't it the same as Li Xian? The argument of beating and arresting people is the most controversial. You only say bad things. Yingzong never gave up on the blind and lame money queen, and could not bear to be martyred. I think I abolished human martyrdom. You say it so that people can understand. You can only pick out the bad ones, saying that Li Shimin will definitely pick out more than Yingzong.