History books? The Twenty-four Historic Righteousness is a national event and a cultural festival organized by later generations to save this world. There are three understandings of the so-called official history: one is? Are you going to class or riding a horse? ("Sui Shu? Jing Ji Zhi, which is a biographical dynastic history; And second? Everyone who has not been judged by Chen knows it. ("Sikuquanshu"), that is, compiled by the official or approved by the court; Third, fairness and impartiality. The pen has its merits, and the editor is definitely a contemporary scholar. They worked day and night to sort out treasures, public and private letters, inspect relics and make field visits, all carefully. Who dares to make fun of his own head, who dares to leave a stigma for future generations? The pulse of major events is clear, the important figures are accurate and well-founded, and its historical value is irreplaceable.
The history books that can be handed down have been tested by more than a hundred generations of scholars. If we don't believe, what should we believe? As for disbelief, it is actually for professional historians. There is a threshold for disbelief. The so-called disbelief is actually just a question and proof of some specific contents by historians.
Twenty-four histories, with 3229 volumes and more than 47 million words, are far from what people can do with ease. Many scholars have been immersed in the literature of a specific era for decades and are very familiar with the progress of related archaeological projects. Therefore, they will find their own contradictions in history books and between documents, thus questioning some contents and choosing good ones. This is not a doubt about the history recorded in the history books, but a rectification of the editor's improper handling of historical materials. History is a material science, and the historical materials of every ancient book, including notes, novels and literary works, have their own unique historical value, not to mention history books.
To judge whether some details of history books are true or not, we should not presuppose, but not only find out the true intentions of relevant historical materials and editors, but also constantly gain the thinking of the ancients and reject our own subjective assumptions; It is also necessary to find the truth in the comparison of similar materials. To some extent, reading history is the judge's trial. The plaintiff, defendant, testimony and evidence are all on the table, and the truth will come out after detailed examination. Due to the lack of historical materials, many histories may never have the truth.
The process of reading history is actually a process of changing yourself. In real life, many places regard history and culture as a gold mine, and let historical celebrities serve their wallets and satisfy their local vanity. This is not that the history books are not credible, but that greed and reputation are lost. For example, online always loves to make? Plow the land? Controversy. According to the Book of Later Han Dynasty, in the first month of 207 BC, Cao Cao and Zhang Xiu fought in Wancheng. The history of the Three Kingdoms can be published in this year. At that time, Zhuge Xuan's uncle went to Jingzhou to vote for Liu Biao's Western Expedition, and Zhuge Liang gave Liu Bei the dragon bell pile at home in 197. Li Daoyuan (now Biyang), as the satrap of Luyang in the Northern Wei Dynasty and the secretariat of East Jingzhou, was the secretariat of Nanyang at that time, and recorded all kinds of scenery of Ganshui in detail, citing all kinds of previous historical materials, and recorded Zhuge Liang's seclusion in Hanshui today in Longzhong, Xiangyang. Nanyang Wuhou Temple was built in Yuan Dynasty. Which "model" was it? Nanyang plough? Does it mean Wancheng of Nanyang County (now Wancheng District of Nanyang City)?
If there is no dispute, isn't it to make a name for yourself and gain popularity by slandering history books? As a result, the voice of attacking the historians of the Eastern Jin Dynasty and discrediting Xiangyang flooded the Internet, and the fact was denying the relevant works of Professor Zhu Shaohou of Henan University and Professor Gao Min of Zhengzhou University. But most of his articles have nothing to do with historical research, and the whole article is subjective and out of tune. Just one slogan: Zhuge Liang said that he devoted himself to Nanyang. Anyone with historical thinking knows that Nanyang Wuhou Temple has no historical records before the Yuan Dynasty, Zhuge Liang? Cultivated in Longzhong, Dengxian County, Nanyang County, 20 miles west of Xiangyang City? History has two words. It's not that history books are not credible, but that they don't read history books at all, and they are mercenary and engage in historical fraud.
Wei Zhi's "Sui Shu" is a straightforward book, with few melodies, which is not taboo for the venerable and not attached to Li in the Tang Dynasty. Zhang's professional information on Ming history is also extremely informative. He tries to find a way out of history and reality in unspeakable and taboo. The ancients compiled history without lack of political considerations, but they all realized their lives by writing history? Three immortals are important means.
"Augmented Xianwen" said:? Look, we should learn from the past now, and we can't do anything without the past. ? If you don't believe the history recorded in the history books, who will believe you? People who deny history often have ulterior motives.