Because it can be seen from the materials that "if you want public security in the world, you must go to the mining field, but you must limit the field", his point of view is actually to restore the ancient mining field system, which is an unscientific way to reverse the calendar, so A is excluded.
As long as land sales exist, land merger will inevitably follow. The ancients denounced the sale of land because they saw the terrible consequences of land merger. Qiu Jun, a member of Amin Dynasty, once said calmly: "After the abolition of the mining field, the field was not in the government but in the people, which was based on the inequality between the rich and the poor." "Although the meaning of limiting farmland is different, the system of Hirata is not suitable for local customs, but it can be temporary, not permanent. In the end, we must listen to the people. " Qiu Jun's argument reflects the interests and demands of the landlord class. In the pure landlord economy, the landlord's pursuit of consumption is infinite, which determines that they must try their best to annex land and expand their economic capacity, and B should choose.
They all saw the phenomenon of uneven land in feudal society, and C had to choose.
Qiu Jun doesn't think that limiting land and even land is the basic good policy to stabilize the ruling order and eliminate the inequality between the rich and the poor. There is evidence that "the meaning of limiting land, even land system has its advantages, but it is inevitably out of line with local customs, but it can be temporary and not frequent, and in the end it must be the virtue of listening to people's own needs", which excludes D.
So the correct answers are b and C.
Question 2: D.
I have seen this topic elsewhere, and I chose D. The topic is too long, so I won't analyze it one by one.
Come on!