Review of Tokyo trial 1
Generally speaking, this is a work that disappoints me. When I watched the movie, I was very much looking forward to it because of the indignation and passionate speeches of several protagonists. However, when you sit in the cinema and feel with your heart, there is only a frivolous feeling in the whole process. Knowing that these histories are enough to make people feel depressed and stinging, but the weight of these histories is stuck in their throats, lacking destructive impact, which makes these weights instantly overweight and even slowly precipitate-however, no! ! ! In the whole process, I didn't feel the sadness and hatred brought by Japanese militarism and aggression, and the ensuing killing and bloodshed. I don't feel the collision and outbreak of historical events in various countries, I don't feel punished for crimes, and I show the pleasure and excitement of peace.
In a word, lack-shock.
The film is from China judge Meru? Taking H as the breakthrough point, it focuses on some nodes in the whole trial process, and also interspersed with the love affair between China journalists and Japanese journalists, some Japanese consciousness, some Japanese youth's misinterpretation of the war, hatred and revenge against China, the shadow and regret left by Japanese veterans after the war, and the fear of Japanese women being insulted in response to the call of the country in the war.
The key plot that impressed me deeply: 1. Meiru at the beginning of the trial? Strive for a trial seat; First, two drunken Japanese were shot and killed by American drivers; First, Puyi's testimony; First, the American judge questioned tojo hideki, and finally tojo hideki stubbornly admitted that he would continue the war of aggression if possible; One is the scene where the Japanese proprietress was killed by a bullet; Finally, vote on the circumstances of the death penalty.
However, it is these key plots that make me less satisfied. These plots are not deep and delicate enough to make people unable to devote themselves to feelings. Even an audience full of anger and ready to devote themselves to emotion can't settle their feelings. In fact, there is always a bright spot in the whole movie. There are two recognized masters, DAMIAN LAU and Ceng Jiang. Don't worry that they can't express these emotions. However, I don't know whether it is the screenwriter or the director. These emotional actors are all expounding some empty rhetoric and have no strength at all. It's like a big fist hitting you, making you tremble and scared, but it doesn't hurt as much as you think.
Reflection on Tokyo Trial II
We don't know who the 1 1 judge in a democratic country voted for, nor does Judge Mei Ruxuan, who represented China at the Far East International Military Tribunal. The planners and organizers of the war of aggression should be hanged, but we can't say that the five judges have no benevolence and morality, because they are representatives of a country, and they represent their country's position and interests in this war.
I thought of the recently popular "killing" game. A is a policeman, and he experienced it at night. B is a gangster. When voting, A "jumped the police", pointing out that B was a gangster and persuading civilians to vote for B, but B stubbornly refused to admit it, while civilians held their own views. In the Tokyo trial, Mr. Mei Ruao obviously played the role of a policeman, tojo hideki and other Japanese war criminals were gangsters, and other 10 judges played the role of civilians. Hideyoshi Tojo's crime is obvious, just like in the "murder" game, the police experienced their gangster status, but when the judge questioned them, tojo hideki, Shintaro Banhara and other war criminals all said "I am not guilty", which is a manifestation of militarism that ignores international law and humanitarianism. During the trial, tojo hideki, Masajiro Banyuan and others said, "We are out of sympathy and friendship", "We are peace-loving Japanese", "We are fighting in self-defense and do not violate international law" and "Japan has not invaded Manchuria in any way".
The most exciting thing is that tojo hideki actually said, "We were right in the past, now and in the future, and we will continue to wage war." Everyone in China will only arouse hatred towards the Japanese and tojo hideki after listening to this sentence, so we can understand why there is still such a high anti-Japanese sentiment among our people today. There is nothing wrong with China people. All our anti-Japanese feelings are brought by the Japanese. Of course, I personally oppose radical patriotism!
There was also a funny scene in the Tokyo trial. At the end of the trial, when sentencing, whether Class A war criminals are sentenced to death is originally a legal issue. Actually, the issues of civilization and religion were discussed, and the issues of Buddhism were also discussed, which further illustrated the inner conflict of interests of 1 1 judges.
Fortunately, they finally agreed to execute tojo hideki and other Class A war criminals. Although, this result is too long and shocking.
Reflections on the Tokyo trial 3
As a native of China, I have to say that The Tokyo Trial is a movie worth seeing. The mood after watching the Tokyo trial is heavy. ...
A scene that just came up touched me deeply. On the issue of seating, Judge Mei disagreed with other judges, but Judge Mei looked around and insisted on her opinion, because China people were not backward, and she defended the dignity of the country with her own strength. This is Judge May, and this is a real China person!
After many attempts, the final decision depends on a ballot box, a small but decisive ballot box, which firmly grasped my heart. Although I have guessed the final result, I am still nervous. No, no, yes, no, yes, no, my heart began to become heavy and disappointed. No, if 1 1 the referee's decision appears on this frequency, China will have no chance. In the cinema, all the students read the votes after them, and the last vote is coming. All our classmates breathed a sigh of relief, which also contained a patriotic feeling.
"Genji Matsui Shigen, Hiroshi tianhao, tojo hideki, Wu Tengzhang, Banyuanzheng Shiro, Heitaro Kimura, remember their sins and that sad history. I hate them, because they have made our motherland experience such grief. For memories, it is a kind of sadness and hatred that can never be erased. Our judgment is not only to punish them, even if no amount of punishment seems to be enough. What we want is dignity, the dignity of a country and an ancient nation.
"We look forward to being like the Buddha, without war and sin!"
Reflections on the Tokyo trial 4
This is a film that begins with the history of war. This paper describes the international trial process of Japan's major war criminals in World War II in Tokyo from1June 1946 to1948+065438+1October. In order to better conduct this trial, the International Military Tribunal established the Far East International Military Tribunal, which is composed of Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, France and 1 1 countries including Zhong Yi. Judge China, representing Dr. Mei Ruao, successfully completed this difficult trial which lasted for more than two years with sincere patriotism and strong national consciousness, and with wisdom and ability to withstand external pressure.
I am glad to have the opportunity to finish watching this shocking film. I was deeply moved by this film, and I was deeply impressed by its true history and some distinctive representatives. Among them, Meiru, the judge representative of China, gave me great inspiration and a good demonstration. I think Meiru is a person with good ideological and moral quality and legal concept. He can elevate his personal feelings to national feelings, be loyal to his country and people, dare to safeguard the dignity and interests of the country and the people, use his wisdom and legal weapons to conduct the fairest and most just trial of criminals, so that the dead and the injured by criminals can have the last line of defense to protect themselves, and only then can a just and harmonious society be established in the world.
Fascist aggression is a heinous act, and it is not an exaggeration to call it a demon. It seriously damages the territorial sovereignty of other countries, harms the interests of the people, brutally kills innocent people, but has no sense of shame about its actions. I can't imagine what kind of demon this is. The beautiful civilization of the world is seriously threatened by such a demon. Today, we can finally bring this terrible demon to justice, and his crime will be severely punished by international law. How much have Britain, France and China done to protect their country and people? They should be severely punished, and only death can comfort the dead. As a person who keeps his nationality, he should always know how to safeguard the interests and national dignity of the country and the people and be a useful person to the society and the people.
Reflections on the Tokyo trial 5
Extending from the law class, I happened to see a movie called Tokyo Trial. Apart from immersing students in the sea of law, the most important thing about this film is that it reflects China's victory in the trial of war criminals in World War II and reminds the people of China of their lofty dignity-the call for patriotism is loud and clear. -inscription
The Tokyo Trial, with the end of World War II as the background, tells the story of the Far East International Military Tribunal composed of eleven countries, which completed the trial of 28 Japanese Class A war criminals in two years, and at the same time showed the changes of special Japanese family relations at that time.
In this successful trial, a judge has made outstanding achievements, and he is worthy of the title of "great man". This man is Merrio.
In the film, Mei Ruao resolutely opposes the arrangement of judges' seats and insists on arranging judges' seats in the order in which Japan signed the surrender letter. After many failures, she resolutely took off his robe symbolizing power, refused to rehearse in court, argued, and threw out the threat of "if I don't support it, I will resign immediately", so that the judges finally compromised and rearranged their positions. A person who doesn't have the professional quality of a diplomat can't easily get the information contained in the seating arrangement, but Meruoao's critical eye has brought the mistakes that are detrimental to national dignity to the extreme. I'm not a soldier ... I'm a judge, a judge in China! "Hit the floor.
In addition, when deciding whether to treat war criminals with the death penalty, Mei Ruxuan, who supported the death penalty, completed the preaching of her own views, supported the views of fellow travelers, and pulled back the position of strangers. At the time of counting the votes, the last supporting vote made the development of history as many people in China hoped, and brought a happy song to China with a slight advantage of 6: 5.
In addition to Mei Ruao, those judges who silently accumulate evidence of war criminals' crimes, give the evidence the right to speak, and fight injustice with justice must also be great men in this trial. In the end, although the theater lights went out, the great spirit emerged in the film has miraculously remained in the ashes of the times: shouldering the great mission of the motherland, guarding the dignity of the country and cherishing world peace.
Reflections on the Tokyo trial 6
"A movie that everyone in China must watch" The Tokyo Trial is a 1 10-minute film, which accuses those real historical pictures, but because of its historical facts and wonderful performances by actors, the Tokyo Trial can be regarded as a historical blockbuster. The Tokyo Trial focuses on the trial of Japanese war criminals during World War II, and tells the trial process of 28 Class-A war criminals by judges from China, the United States, Britain, France and other countries after World War II. At the end of the film, judges in different countries have great differences in sentencing. Judge Mei Ruzhen of China denounced Japanese war criminals' wanton plunder of China's resources and heinous crimes against humanity from a legal perspective. When voting whether to execute the death penalty, he finally hanged seven Class-A war criminals, including tojo hideki and Kenji Toshihara, with a vote of 6 to 5.
I can't forget many scenes in this play. The most impressive thing should be the beginning, because of the judge's seat. Mei Ruao insisted on arranging judges' seats in the order of Japanese surrender, because it was related to the dignity of China and was the insistence of a China person. In the end, the court can only say to Mayo: You have succeeded. "China will be proud to have a soldier like you!" "I'm not a fighter, I'm a judge, a judge in China," replied Mario. This sentence shocked me. It expressed the pride and self-confidence of a China person, and moved me to have such a judge in China.
In court, what surprised me for the first time was that when I entered the judge's inquiry, tojo hideki, Banyuan Seijiro and other war criminals said "I'm not guilty" in unison. This is a manifestation of militarism that ignores international law and humanitarianism. During the trial, tojo hideki, Masajiro Banyuan and others said, "We are out of sympathy and friendship", "We are peace-loving Japanese", "We are fighting in self-defense and do not violate international law" and "Japan has not invaded Manchuria in any way". What is even more hateful is that in War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, the Japanese army slaughtered more than 20 1.5 million people in China!
What shocked me for the second time was that when I entered the trial stage, Mei Ruxuan's impassioned speech grabbed my heart. 1 1 The judges reported their opinions in an orderly manner. As the last "yes" cloud suddenly dissipates, I really feel that the future is bright. Happy! We should firmly remember these names: Uehara Kenji, Matsui Shigen, Hiroshi tianhao, tojo hideki, Wu Tengzhang, Masaji Banhara, Heitaro Kimura, remember them and nail them on the shame column of history forever to warn us and future generations.