As shown in the above picture, because there were two equal votes, 75 superstars were actually selected as 76 people, many of whom were familiar with them, such as Jordan, Jabbar, Olajuwon and so on. Most of them are uncontroversial, but many of them are controversial. For example, Lillard, Davies and Miller really don't have hard honors.
Lillard participated in the draft in 20 12, and this year is the ninth season. There is only one best moment and one best rookie in his whole career, and there is nothing else. He is neither the scoring champion nor the top MVP. If you want to lead the team well, that's fine, but the problem is that of the nine seasons of his career, he didn't even make it to the playoffs in three seasons, and he was swept in the first round in two seasons, and he never made it to the career finals. Can this also be selected as 75 superstars?
Lillard was selected at least for a while, so this guy's next selection really depends on his feelings. Miller's career in 18 has no honor, no scoring champion, no MVP and no best team. He is too thin to write anything. It is worth mentioning that he was selected as an All-Star only five times in his career at 18, and four of them were selected as substitutes. I really don't understand what the criteria for judging the top 75 superstars are. No data, no honor, no results. Is it because of feelings?
In fact, what moved me most was that Howard was not selected. Howard won five rebounds, two blocked shots, three best defensive players, five best defensive teams at one time and four best defensive teams at another time in 16 season. He was an all-star for eight times in his career, with a total rebounding ranking of 14 and a total blocked shot of 13, leading the team to the finals. I really don't understand where Lila is better than Howard. I don't understand that Howard is no match for honor or leadership.