This is a high school history topic, and you don't need much extra-curricular history knowledge to answer this question. Lesson 19: The Russian socialist revolution involves two revolutions, the February Revolution and the October Revolution. The February Revolution overthrew the autocratic rule of the Tsar and established a bourgeois provisional government in connection with the history at that time. It is worth noting that this has formed two regimes, but it needs to be emphasized that the bourgeoisie is dominant. You can check the information. At that time, I was a member of the bourgeois provisional government. I remember that there was only one socialist in the cabinet. In fact, the above knowledge can help you answer this question. The way to solve the problem is to return to the textbook and get familiar with the knowledge of the textbook. It is suggested that the landlord strengthen his familiarity with textbooks. From an extra-curricular point of view, when the author Stavri Anoos wrote this passage, he wrote about the psychology of the bourgeoisie at that time. At that time, the armed forces of the February Revolution were mainly workers and soldiers. It can be said that the proletariat led by the Bolsheviks was stronger at that time, and the landlord may wonder why the Bolsheviks did not directly establish a new government at that time. There is a reason for this. At that time, most Bolsheviks believed in Marxism. As Marxists, most Soviet representatives regard the March Revolution as a bourgeois uprising, and believe that it is impossible to carry out a second revolution, that is, a socialist revolution, before Russia experiences long-term economic development. Therefore, their strategy is to keep the interim government in power. You will say that at that time, the bourgeoisie thought that "the radicals in the street would take their place" was redundant, but who knows what others are thinking, for example. Two men, one handsome and the other plain, are going after a girl. He will definitely worry about handsome fighting him, but will handsome really fight him? That's what I'm saying. It is these two factors: the understanding of 1 Bolshevik has not been combined with the reality of Russia at that time (Lenin later made a breakthrough in this understanding and developed Marxism). The same is true of later historical facts.

These are some personal understandings! Hope to help the landlord!