Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - Mankind has not learned any lessons from history.
Mankind has not learned any lessons from history.
1. "The only lesson that history has taught people is that people have never learned any lessons from history." Why did the German philosopher Hegel once say that the only lesson that mankind can learn from history is never to learn from it? Throughout the history of human development in the world, it is found that activities such as regime change and economic development are constantly repeating the past.

"History is always repeating itself", which is often regarded as the standard by us. In fact, history has become a fait accompli, and it is meaningless to simply dwell on it. The practical significance of reading history lies in gaining useful experiences and lessons for the present and the future.

"History will always be strikingly similar, but it will not be simply repeated", which is the natural law of the development of things and also a philosophical dialectics. This similarity is similar in form, but not exactly the same. It is not advisable to ignore this similarity and regularity, and the mechanical copying of metaphysics is also unscientific.

Extended data:

Hegel's words and Du Mu's Epang Palace Fu show that Qin people were too busy to mourn for themselves, and later people mourned for them. This sentence has the same effect, but it also makes future generations lament that future generations do not learn lessons.

Qin people haven't had time to mourn themselves, but later generations mourn him; If future generations mourn him but don't learn from him, it will only make future generations mourn this future generation again.

Take history as a mirror. We should not only remember history, but also learn from it. The history of the Qing dynasty tells us that if we want to develop, we must open to the outside world; Eight-Nation Alliance's war of aggression against China tells us that the only way to avoid being invaded is to develop military power;

The rapid development of China's economy tells us that only cooperation and sharing can promote common economic development, and no country's development only depends on its own strength. Only by taking history as a mirror, finding the correct development direction from history and strengthening the road can we write a new history and create a brilliant chapter.

Baidu Encyclopedia-Hegel

2. The lesson we have learned from history is that we have learned nothing from history and no philosophical significance. Just like people used to know the three worlds of the world, seeing mountains is mountains and water is water: seeing mountains is not mountains, seeing water is not water: seeing mountains or mountains, seeing water or water.

Studying history is the past tense of research. Even if we find out the reasons, processes, results, people, relationships and other factors, we can find out the past, but we can't change it, because it is a foregone conclusion. Reality is constantly developing and changing, and the study of history seems to have little effect on reality. It seems that history can only be used as an academic research, not in real life. Our history is written by ourselves. We are also constantly making history. If real life is not handled well, historical knowledge will be empty.

However, I still think it is very important to study history, but what matters is how many people and things you know, not some truth and some relationship that exists in them. History should not be strict logic, it is alive, it is the life of our ancestors, and it is also a philosophical thought that can inspire us. There is also an understanding of this land story, and then I like it here without slandering it casually. Also let us know how to consider cause and effect, think carefully, and become safe and not rash. Should we improve our knowledge step by step, or should we treat it positively and correctly?

Well, it's just my own feeling. Please forgive me if you know a little.

The only lesson we can learn from history is that we can't learn anything from it. It's different from upstairs.

I think this sentence should be about humanity.

In history, more than N people know about Xia Jie and Shang Tang, including their stories, but there are still so many dynasties perished because of repeating the same mistakes.

People are always greedy. After the society is peaceful, stable and rich, they will become lazy and selfish. Although there is history to learn from, there is a kind of luck, thinking that national subjugation will not happen to me, and eventually people's grievances will explode and the country will be ruined!

So the history we see now is because every dynasty has no history of learning lessons.

Personally, I think that society is not developing and needs to look forward.

Since ancient times, this has been the case in governing the country. There is no difference before and after.

Humans will not learn from history, but will only repeat it. Who said this sentence? This sentence was said by the German philosopher Hegel, and it is one of Hegel's famous maxims.

The full text of German is as follows:

Da? They took off their hats and put them on the table so that they could move freely.

History has the characteristic of repeating itself and will last until the lessons are understood.

There are many other translations: human beings will not learn from history, but will only repeat it.

The lesson that mankind has learned from history is that mankind never remembers the lessons of history.

Extended data:

Georg wilhelm friedrich hegel, a German philosopher, was one of the representatives of German idealist philosophy in19th century. Hegel was born in Stuttgart, the capital of Baden-Wü rttemberg in southwest Germany today. He is the president of Berlin University (Humboldt University in Berlin today).

Hegel's thought marked the peak of German idealistic philosophy movement in the19th century, which had a far-reaching influence on later philosophical schools. What's more, because Hegel's political thought has the essence of liberalism and conservatism, his philosophy undoubtedly provides a new way out for liberalism.

The argument that mankind has not learned from history is 1. I don't think mankind has learned from history. Looking at the historical platform, it is not difficult to find that from ancient times to the present, there have been the most wars in various dynasties in history, and the people who suffered the most from each war were the people. If a country is in a state of war all the year round, its leaders will lose the trust and support of the people. I won't support such a * * *, so this country will be shattered sooner or later. This was the case five thousand years ago, and it is still the case now. Today's Middle East is a good example. They just didn't learn from history. I don't think mankind has learned from history. Since five thousand years ago, there have been criminals, bandits, bandits and bandits in modern times. Nobody thought about why. If you take a closer look at the history of past dynasties, you will find that it is all because the officials of * * * are unfair, or that * * * makes people unable to get basic living security. Therefore, it is because there are too many corrupt officials in * * *, so there is a saying that "* * *, the people are in poverty". Willing to live a wandering life, in today's society, this phenomenon is still everywhere, still * * *, so I say that human beings have not learned from the long river of history, and I hope it will help the landlord.