234 is controversial. Bayern dominated the Bundesliga, but there was water in the back garden of the Bundesliga. Milan has been in decline for more than ten years. If Milan was undoubtedly second before 2008, then Liverpool had dominated League One and the Champions League. Although the European War continued to be exported, the league results after the reorganization of the Premier League were not very convincing until recently, only 02,08, 13. If you wait in line here, it depends on your personal preference. I think it's two. Liverpool 3. Milan 4. Bayern.
Fifth, sixth and seventh are also controversial. This grade is Manchester United, Juventus and Barcelona. It's really interesting that some people rank Manchester United ahead of Liverpool. Manchester United has one more league title than Liverpool, but its European performance lags far behind Liverpool. Only in the new century did Manchester United rank first? I'm a new fan, too, but this is a comprehensive ranking. It is not worthwhile for Manchester United to give Liverpool shoes 90 or 00 years ago. Only after 2008 did Manchester United dare to really wrestle with Liverpool's historical record. Did the old lady in Europe pull her hips? Although the number of champions is small, look at the number of runners-up. Who can reach the Champions League final is the weak team? Who dares to look down on the old woman in the Champions League? Moreover, together with Inter Milan, Juventus dominated Serie A (10 years ago), which is not the same level as Bayern.
Barcelona and Manchester United have problems. Are all those who think so highly of her watching football in the new century? I don't comment on La Liga, but before the Champions League in the 1990s, Barcelona was nothing but a little dream in the early 1990s. It was not until Ronaldinho came that Barcelona became the cosmic team that people now know. Barcelona could not compete with Porto before Ronaldinho came to Barcelona. It is Dream II and Dream III that prop up Barcelona's historical position. This is why Barcelona would like to thank Messi. Without Cristiano Ronaldo, Real Madrid is still the real Madrid. Without Messi, do you think Barcelona is still the same Barcelona? What is discussed here is the influence of players on the team's historical position, which has nothing to do with the player's ability.
How to arrange the last five, six and seven depends on personal preferences. Personally, I think it's five Juve, six Barcelona and seven Manchester United.
Eighth must be our best interest. We can't beat Milan in the Champions League in Serie A and Juventus in the League, which is really hard. If Calciopoli hadn't let Inter Milan rule for a while, the league result might have been even worse. It can only be said that Mourinho's triple crown is the only record that can make our Inter Milan hard to hold on to.
The ninth is our Ajax, and the European Youth Army should not be underestimated. Although money made the Dutch team decline, her strong historical record and the first youth training ability in Europe made her rise from time to time or brought Ajax here.
The tenth is Porto. Like Ajax, what makes her rank high here is the historical record and the prestige of European black spots. But the state is a little unstable.
The rest of Chelsea, Arsenal, Manchester City, Atletico Madrid, Bali and Dortmund are far from the top ten. The only ones close are Chelsea and Dortmund, and the other Champions League results are too unconvincing. Apart from Arsenal, Dortmund and Atletico Madrid have a little historical background, and the other three are nouveau riche with no history at all, all bought by oil bosses in the new century with money. These six teams are either poor in the Champions League or poor in history. The only hope is to replace the last two teams. Without decades of high-level European civil war (plus the first eight teams did nothing), it is impossible to replace the other eight teams.