The annual history exam is over again. In this exam, the results of the six courses I taught were not satisfactory for many reasons. In order to make greater achievements in future teaching, it is necessary to sum up experiences and lessons. Therefore, a brief analysis of the final exam:

First, the students.

1. Unclear historical facts is a fatal weakness.

2. Some students have incorrect attitudes. Either they don't pay attention to it, or they think history is easy to learn, and they just recite it, so they can catch up quickly even if they fall behind.

3. Lack of ability to solve problems. How to find the best item from the four options and improve the correct rate; How to examine the questions well and answer them closely; How to arrange papers reasonably, score as many as possible and so on.

4. Reading is not detailed. I didn't listen to the teacher's advice, thinking that I wouldn't take exams everywhere, so I was lucky and suffered a heavy blow.

5. Can't read. Students are used to reading a textbook from beginning to end, but pay less attention to grasping the pulse of historical development, appreciating the connection between historical events and appreciating the profoundness of history.

6. Students' autonomous learning ability is poor and they are servile. They refused to work hard and took the initiative to reverse polarity. This is the main reason for their unsatisfactory grades. The eighth grade is the most polarized period for middle school students. Good students can get about X, poor students can only get about X, which is too big.

Second, teaching.

1. Due to the limitation of class hours and content, students can't form a systematic understanding of the content of the whole class, which affects their mastery of the teaching materials.

2. Insufficient supervision and inspection.

3. Although historical stories can arouse students' interest, they sometimes take up too long and should be adjusted appropriately in class.

4. The teacher didn't dig the teaching materials in place, which led to some students not being exposed to individual questions during the exam, and as a result, students couldn't answer them.

Third, other aspects.

1. The questions in this exam are difficult, with a large number and a wide range.

2. Tight time before the final exam, more content and less review time in the mid-term are also a reason for poor exam results.

In view of the above reasons, I should strive to do in the future teaching work:

1. In class, teachers should explain social knowledge thoroughly, have clear views and make proper comments. There can be no right and wrong, ambiguous situation.

2. Unit tests and classroom exercises should be centered on teaching materials, with appropriate difficulty, and should not be divorced from students' reality.

3. In class discussion or cooperative learning, students should conduct in-depth research before class and fully grasp this "degree".

4. According to the teaching progress and the actual situation of the school, as many social practice activities as possible are arranged in combination with the teaching materials.

5. The evaluation of students' classroom lectures, discussions and answers should be objective and fair, and we should not praise and say yes blindly.