Current location - Music Encyclopedia - Chinese History - Is the "end of history" over?
Is the "end of history" over?
The final conclusion of history is that it is over.

origin

After the end of the cold war, how to evaluate the capitalist system and socialist system and their fate has become a realistic issue of general concern in the theoretical circles of the East and the West. In this context, Fukuyama threw out the so-called "final conclusion of history".

failure theory

"The theory of capitalist failure" was put forward by Japanese beauty Fukuyama. In his view, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the end of the Cold War marked the end of capitalism. There is only one way to develop history, that is, the western market economy and democratic politics. In his view, the development history of human society is a "universal history of human progress towards freedom and democracy".

Liberal democracy is "the end of the development of human ideology" and "the last form of human rule". The most important point of neoliberalism is that the status quo is irreplaceable. In addition, the technology to improve human living conditions is so amazing that the statement that "there is no choice but to maintain the status quo" seems far-fetched today than ever before.

In fact, we still don't know how to establish a feasible, free and noble post-capitalist order, which is a utopia in itself. But every progress in history must overcome the so-called concept that was impossible before. As Chomsky pointed out, organized political radicalism has contributed to our democracy today.

It brings adult universal suffrage, women's rights, trade unions, civil rights and the freedoms we enjoy. Human political activities can make the world we live in more noble. Even if it seems impossible to establish a post-capitalist society, we should take the political and economic system based on the principles of cooperation, equality, autonomy and individual freedom as the starting point of thinking.

Fighting for social change is not a hypothetical problem. The modern neoliberal order has caused a huge political and economic crisis, which is being experienced from East Asia to Eastern Europe to Latin America. The quality of life of people in developed countries in Europe, Japan and North America is fragile, and these societies are also very chaotic.

Dramatic changes are likely to take place in the next few years. The result of this drastic change is not clear, but there is no reason to believe that turmoil will automatically develop towards democratic and humane solutions. Everything depends on how we and people organize, respond and act.

As Chomsky said, if you think there is no possibility of changing towards a better prospect and act according to this idea, then you will definitely not change. The future choice is in the hands of all of us.

Extended data:

The conclusion of the end of history originated from a lecture entitled "The End of History" given by Francis Fukuyama in 1988. Later, he wrote a paper on the basis of the lecture-"The End of History? From 65438 to 0989, the American neo-conservative journal National Interest published this article, which marked the official appearance of the "end of history conclusion" as a complete theoretical system.

After the end of the cold war, how to evaluate the capitalist system and socialist system and their fate has become a realistic issue of general concern in the theoretical circles of the East and the West. In this context, Fukuyama threw out the so-called "final conclusion of history".

Baidu Encyclopedia —— The Final Conclusion of History